Assessing evapotranspiration models for regional implementation in the Mediterranean: a comparative analysis of STEPS, TSEB, and SCOPE with global datasets
Assessing evapotranspiration models for regional implementation in the Mediterranean: a comparative analysis of STEPS, TSEB, and SCOPE with global datasets
Accurate evapotranspiration (ET) estimation is crucial for sustainable water management in the diverse and water-scarce Mediterranean region. This study compares three prominent models (Simulator of Terrestrial Ecohydrological Processes and Systems (STEPS), Soil-Canopy-Observation of Photosynthesis and Energy fluxes (SCOPE), and Two-Source Energy Balance (TSEB)) with established global datasets (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer 8-day global terrestrial product (MOD16A2), Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM), and TerraClimate) at multiple spatial and temporal scales and validates model outcomes with eddy covariance based ground measurements. Insufficient ground-based observations limit comprehensive model validation in the eastern Mediterranean part (Turkey and Balkans). The results reveal significant discrepancies among models and datasets, highlighting the challenges of capturing ET variability in this complex region. Differences are attributed to variations in ecosystem type, energy balance calculations, and water availability constraints. Ground validation shows that STEPS performs well in some French and Italian forests and crops sites but struggles with seasonal ET patterns in some locations. SCOPE mostly overestimates ET due to detailed radiation flux calculations and lacks accurate water limitation representation. TSEB faces challenges in capturing ET variations across different ecosystems at a coarser 10 km resolution. No single model and global dataset accurately represent ET across the entire region. Model performance varies by region and ecosystem. As GLEAM and TSEB excel in semi-arid Savannahs, STEPS and SCOPE are better in grasslands, croplands, and forests in few locations (5 out of 18 sites) which indicates these models need calibration for other locations and ecosystem types. Thus, a region-specific model calibration and validation, sensitive to extremely humid and arid conditions can improve ET estimation across the diverse Mediterranean region.
eddy covariance, eco-hydrology, evapotranspiration modeling, water balance, energy balance, Mediterranean ecosystems
Unnisa, Zaib
8add3b0c-d74b-461d-8fcd-691805df17c6
Burchard-Levine, Vicente
324fb26e-ff56-4db1-9040-2c9c14be23ac
30 August 2024
Unnisa, Zaib
8add3b0c-d74b-461d-8fcd-691805df17c6
Burchard-Levine, Vicente
324fb26e-ff56-4db1-9040-2c9c14be23ac
Unnisa, Zaib, Govind, Ajit, Prikaziuk, Egor, Van der Tol, Christiaan, Lasserre, Bruno, Burchard-Levine, Vicente and Marchetti, Marco
(2024)
Assessing evapotranspiration models for regional implementation in the Mediterranean: a comparative analysis of STEPS, TSEB, and SCOPE with global datasets.
Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14 (17), [7685].
(doi:10.3390/app14177685).
Abstract
Accurate evapotranspiration (ET) estimation is crucial for sustainable water management in the diverse and water-scarce Mediterranean region. This study compares three prominent models (Simulator of Terrestrial Ecohydrological Processes and Systems (STEPS), Soil-Canopy-Observation of Photosynthesis and Energy fluxes (SCOPE), and Two-Source Energy Balance (TSEB)) with established global datasets (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer 8-day global terrestrial product (MOD16A2), Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM), and TerraClimate) at multiple spatial and temporal scales and validates model outcomes with eddy covariance based ground measurements. Insufficient ground-based observations limit comprehensive model validation in the eastern Mediterranean part (Turkey and Balkans). The results reveal significant discrepancies among models and datasets, highlighting the challenges of capturing ET variability in this complex region. Differences are attributed to variations in ecosystem type, energy balance calculations, and water availability constraints. Ground validation shows that STEPS performs well in some French and Italian forests and crops sites but struggles with seasonal ET patterns in some locations. SCOPE mostly overestimates ET due to detailed radiation flux calculations and lacks accurate water limitation representation. TSEB faces challenges in capturing ET variations across different ecosystems at a coarser 10 km resolution. No single model and global dataset accurately represent ET across the entire region. Model performance varies by region and ecosystem. As GLEAM and TSEB excel in semi-arid Savannahs, STEPS and SCOPE are better in grasslands, croplands, and forests in few locations (5 out of 18 sites) which indicates these models need calibration for other locations and ecosystem types. Thus, a region-specific model calibration and validation, sensitive to extremely humid and arid conditions can improve ET estimation across the diverse Mediterranean region.
Text
applsci-14-07685
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 20 August 2024
Published date: 30 August 2024
Keywords:
eddy covariance, eco-hydrology, evapotranspiration modeling, water balance, energy balance, Mediterranean ecosystems
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 506496
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506496
ISSN: 2076-3417
PURE UUID: 3c6f6527-a5f0-475b-b3a5-2c15ddfb09fd
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Nov 2025 17:51
Last modified: 11 Nov 2025 03:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Zaib Unnisa
Author:
Ajit Govind
Author:
Egor Prikaziuk
Author:
Christiaan Van der Tol
Author:
Bruno Lasserre
Author:
Vicente Burchard-Levine
Author:
Marco Marchetti
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics