The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The death positivity bias: robustness and explanations

The death positivity bias: robustness and explanations
The death positivity bias: robustness and explanations
The death positivity bias (DPB) refers to the tendency to evaluate deceased individuals more favourably than otherwise identical living ones. Although the DPB is established in the case of public figures (e.g., celebrities, politicians), it is not clear it emerges in the case of lay persons. In addition, its robustness, domain specificity, and underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. In this thesis, I tested the DPB across seven experiments in reference to lay, unfamiliar targets described in neutral or ambiguous terms. I assessed the DPB in terms of trait impressions. Further, I analysed these trait impressions within a domain-based framework of person perception: Sociability (warmth, liking), Morality (morality, respect), and Competence (competence). In Experiment 1, I found no evidence for the DPB when the target vignette was descriptively neutral. In Experiment 2, I introduced evaluative ambiguity and obtained evidence for the DPB: deceased targets were rated higher on liking and respect. In Experiments 3 and 4, I examined whether the DPB is moderated by group membership. The DPB emerged on morality and respect, but was unmoderated by ingroup–outgroup status, that is, it emerged even when the target was a member of a politically disfavoured and socially distant outgroup. In Experiments 5 to 7, I addressed mechanisms underlying the DPB. It was unmoderated by measured norm endorsement (i.e., individual agreement with the idea that the dead should be treated respectfully; Experiment 5) and by manipulated norm framing (i.e., whether respectful treatment was socially enforced or criticised; Experiment 6), although I obtained a main effect on competence in Experiment 6, suggesting possible evaluative spillover when normative cues are made salient. In Experiment 7, the DPB was strongest when participants conveyed their evaluations of the target for a favourable (than unfavourable) audience. Finally, in a mini meta-analysis, the DPB was most reliable in the Morality domain, followed by Sociability, and then Competence. Taken together, the DPB is observed among lay persons. However, it is selective and context-sensitive, shaped by ambiguity, social motives, and communicative relevance.

Keywords: death positivity bias, person perception, sociability, morality, competence, communication goals
University of Southampton
Chandaman, Luke Edward Spencer
cab7facd-b685-4ae9-b5f8-363436a13dc9
Chandaman, Luke Edward Spencer
cab7facd-b685-4ae9-b5f8-363436a13dc9
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Wildschut, Tim
4452a61d-1649-4c4a-bb1d-154ec446ff81

Chandaman, Luke Edward Spencer (2025) The death positivity bias: robustness and explanations. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 171pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The death positivity bias (DPB) refers to the tendency to evaluate deceased individuals more favourably than otherwise identical living ones. Although the DPB is established in the case of public figures (e.g., celebrities, politicians), it is not clear it emerges in the case of lay persons. In addition, its robustness, domain specificity, and underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. In this thesis, I tested the DPB across seven experiments in reference to lay, unfamiliar targets described in neutral or ambiguous terms. I assessed the DPB in terms of trait impressions. Further, I analysed these trait impressions within a domain-based framework of person perception: Sociability (warmth, liking), Morality (morality, respect), and Competence (competence). In Experiment 1, I found no evidence for the DPB when the target vignette was descriptively neutral. In Experiment 2, I introduced evaluative ambiguity and obtained evidence for the DPB: deceased targets were rated higher on liking and respect. In Experiments 3 and 4, I examined whether the DPB is moderated by group membership. The DPB emerged on morality and respect, but was unmoderated by ingroup–outgroup status, that is, it emerged even when the target was a member of a politically disfavoured and socially distant outgroup. In Experiments 5 to 7, I addressed mechanisms underlying the DPB. It was unmoderated by measured norm endorsement (i.e., individual agreement with the idea that the dead should be treated respectfully; Experiment 5) and by manipulated norm framing (i.e., whether respectful treatment was socially enforced or criticised; Experiment 6), although I obtained a main effect on competence in Experiment 6, suggesting possible evaluative spillover when normative cues are made salient. In Experiment 7, the DPB was strongest when participants conveyed their evaluations of the target for a favourable (than unfavourable) audience. Finally, in a mini meta-analysis, the DPB was most reliable in the Morality domain, followed by Sociability, and then Competence. Taken together, the DPB is observed among lay persons. However, it is selective and context-sensitive, shaped by ambiguity, social motives, and communicative relevance.

Keywords: death positivity bias, person perception, sociability, morality, competence, communication goals

Text
LESC_Thesis_Final_Sig_Removed - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (1MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mr-Luke-Chandaman
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 506895
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506895
PURE UUID: 1d902be1-f6c0-4e86-aff7-5c1a7a6784d6
ORCID for Luke Edward Spencer Chandaman: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0007-4024-1502
ORCID for Constantine Sedikides: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X
ORCID for Tim Wildschut: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6499-5487

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Nov 2025 17:47
Last modified: 20 Nov 2025 03:00

Export record

Contributors

Author: Luke Edward Spencer Chandaman ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Constantine Sedikides ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Tim Wildschut ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×