Robustness analysis and experimental validation of a deep neural network for acoustic source imaging
Robustness analysis and experimental validation of a deep neural network for acoustic source imaging
Deep Neural Network (DNN) models offer an attractive alternative to existing acoustic source imaging techniques, such as acoustic beamforming, due to their ever-growing potential with increasing computational power. Source resolution of acoustic beamforming methods is limited at lower frequencies and their source maps may possess sidelobes at higher frequencies. However, acoustic beamforming methods are typically robust over a wide range of simulation and experimental conditions, such as (i) the number of sources present, (ii) source frequency and (ii) extraneous noise sources. The performance of DNN models, when these conditions are varied from their specific design criteria, is yet to be investigated and much work is needed in this area before DNN models can be utilized in experiments, such as wind tunnel tests. Furthermore, few studies have been conducted on experimental validation of DNN models, predominately due to the difficulty of large sets of experimentally obtained data needed for DNN model training and the sensitivity of DNN model performance when any of the aforementioned experimental conditions are varied. In this paper, a series of studies on the robustness of DNN models based on numerical data and experimental data are presented. Numerical DNN (NDNN) models are trained using in-phase and random-phase pressure data generated from six sources over design frequencies from 500 Hz to 20,000 Hz. The robustness of the NDNN models is tested via (1) inclusion of extraneous Gaussian white noise, (2) inclusion of extraneous tonal noise near the design frequency, (3) using source frequencies that slightly differ from the design frequencies and (4) using a number of sources that differs from the design source number. DNN model performance metrics are introduced that present a promising framework for future DNN model studies and bridging the gap between NDNN and experimentally trained DNN models. A preliminary experimental validation was conducted using a single speaker that was systematically placed over a speaker grid to generate training data via acoustic superposition, from which an experimentally trained DNN (EDNN) model was produced. The EDNN model yields exceptional noise source localization capability of the DNN model, revealing a promising start for a more sophisticated EDNN model.
Li, Qing
62261141-b522-4535-a4d1-f5cb8b7b894d
Arcondoulis, Elias J.G.
4e0c8bdf-1810-4d4e-b8e8-9ba9ccd6b746
Wei, Sheng
d614c594-8d46-432e-a85d-2ef673b05ae8
Xu, Pengwei
635ad7f7-dc34-45be-b8b9-5ad046155e7d
Liu, Yu
2ffef4d6-9ac8-4836-affa-445bc3fe9fda
4 May 2024
Li, Qing
62261141-b522-4535-a4d1-f5cb8b7b894d
Arcondoulis, Elias J.G.
4e0c8bdf-1810-4d4e-b8e8-9ba9ccd6b746
Wei, Sheng
d614c594-8d46-432e-a85d-2ef673b05ae8
Xu, Pengwei
635ad7f7-dc34-45be-b8b9-5ad046155e7d
Liu, Yu
2ffef4d6-9ac8-4836-affa-445bc3fe9fda
Li, Qing, Arcondoulis, Elias J.G., Wei, Sheng, Xu, Pengwei and Liu, Yu
(2024)
Robustness analysis and experimental validation of a deep neural network for acoustic source imaging.
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 216, [111477].
(doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111477).
Abstract
Deep Neural Network (DNN) models offer an attractive alternative to existing acoustic source imaging techniques, such as acoustic beamforming, due to their ever-growing potential with increasing computational power. Source resolution of acoustic beamforming methods is limited at lower frequencies and their source maps may possess sidelobes at higher frequencies. However, acoustic beamforming methods are typically robust over a wide range of simulation and experimental conditions, such as (i) the number of sources present, (ii) source frequency and (ii) extraneous noise sources. The performance of DNN models, when these conditions are varied from their specific design criteria, is yet to be investigated and much work is needed in this area before DNN models can be utilized in experiments, such as wind tunnel tests. Furthermore, few studies have been conducted on experimental validation of DNN models, predominately due to the difficulty of large sets of experimentally obtained data needed for DNN model training and the sensitivity of DNN model performance when any of the aforementioned experimental conditions are varied. In this paper, a series of studies on the robustness of DNN models based on numerical data and experimental data are presented. Numerical DNN (NDNN) models are trained using in-phase and random-phase pressure data generated from six sources over design frequencies from 500 Hz to 20,000 Hz. The robustness of the NDNN models is tested via (1) inclusion of extraneous Gaussian white noise, (2) inclusion of extraneous tonal noise near the design frequency, (3) using source frequencies that slightly differ from the design frequencies and (4) using a number of sources that differs from the design source number. DNN model performance metrics are introduced that present a promising framework for future DNN model studies and bridging the gap between NDNN and experimentally trained DNN models. A preliminary experimental validation was conducted using a single speaker that was systematically placed over a speaker grid to generate training data via acoustic superposition, from which an experimentally trained DNN (EDNN) model was produced. The EDNN model yields exceptional noise source localization capability of the DNN model, revealing a promising start for a more sophisticated EDNN model.
Text
Li_MSSP-2024_ExpDNNSourceImaging_RGArchive
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 4 May 2026.
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 28 April 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 May 2024
Published date: 4 May 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 506970
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506970
ISSN: 0888-3270
PURE UUID: 14579abc-189c-4728-b36b-3d12d767e6fe
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Nov 2025 17:57
Last modified: 25 Nov 2025 03:20
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Qing Li
Author:
Elias J.G. Arcondoulis
Author:
Sheng Wei
Author:
Pengwei Xu
Author:
Yu Liu
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics