The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Access to non-pecuniary benefits: does gender matter? Evidence from six low- and middle-income countries

Access to non-pecuniary benefits: does gender matter? Evidence from six low- and middle-income countries
Access to non-pecuniary benefits: does gender matter? Evidence from six low- and middle-income countries
Background
Gender issues remain a neglected area in most approaches to health workforce policy, planning and research. There is an accumulating body of evidence on gender differences in health workers' employment patterns and pay, but inequalities in access to non-pecuniary benefits between men and women have received little attention. This study investigates empirically whether gender differences can be observed in health workers' access to non-pecuniary benefits across six low- and middle-income countries.

Methods
The analysis draws on cross-nationally comparable data from health facility surveys conducted in Chad, Côte d'Ivoire, Jamaica, Mozambique, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe. Probit regression models are used to investigate whether female and male physicians, nurses and midwives enjoy the same access to housing allowance, paid vacations, in-service training and other benefits, controlling for other individual and facility-level characteristics.

Results
While the analysis did not uncover any consistent pattern of gender imbalance in access to non-monetary benefits, some important differences were revealed. Notably, female nursing and midwifery personnel (the majority of the sample) are found significantly less likely than their male counterparts to have accessed in-service training, identified not only as an incentive to attract and retain workers but also essential for strengthening workforce quality.

Conclusion
This study sought to mainstream gender considerations by exploring and documenting sex differences in selected employment indicators across health labour markets. Strengthening the global evidence base about the extent to which gender is independently associated with health workforce performance requires improved generation and dissemination of sex-disaggregated data and research with particular attention to gender dimensions.
1478-4491
Alfano, Marco
0df2fd10-8c2e-444f-9ec2-5c5e74c1a99e
Gupta, Neeru
0e6e51d0-47ec-4ad8-b7a4-a8e32dffa27c
Alfano, Marco
0df2fd10-8c2e-444f-9ec2-5c5e74c1a99e
Gupta, Neeru
0e6e51d0-47ec-4ad8-b7a4-a8e32dffa27c

Alfano, Marco and Gupta, Neeru (2011) Access to non-pecuniary benefits: does gender matter? Evidence from six low- and middle-income countries. Human Resources for Health. (doi:10.1186/1478-4491-9-25).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Gender issues remain a neglected area in most approaches to health workforce policy, planning and research. There is an accumulating body of evidence on gender differences in health workers' employment patterns and pay, but inequalities in access to non-pecuniary benefits between men and women have received little attention. This study investigates empirically whether gender differences can be observed in health workers' access to non-pecuniary benefits across six low- and middle-income countries.

Methods
The analysis draws on cross-nationally comparable data from health facility surveys conducted in Chad, Côte d'Ivoire, Jamaica, Mozambique, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe. Probit regression models are used to investigate whether female and male physicians, nurses and midwives enjoy the same access to housing allowance, paid vacations, in-service training and other benefits, controlling for other individual and facility-level characteristics.

Results
While the analysis did not uncover any consistent pattern of gender imbalance in access to non-monetary benefits, some important differences were revealed. Notably, female nursing and midwifery personnel (the majority of the sample) are found significantly less likely than their male counterparts to have accessed in-service training, identified not only as an incentive to attract and retain workers but also essential for strengthening workforce quality.

Conclusion
This study sought to mainstream gender considerations by exploring and documenting sex differences in selected employment indicators across health labour markets. Strengthening the global evidence base about the extent to which gender is independently associated with health workforce performance requires improved generation and dissemination of sex-disaggregated data and research with particular attention to gender dimensions.

Text
1478-4491-9-25 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (450kB)

More information

Published date: 19 October 2011

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 506981
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506981
ISSN: 1478-4491
PURE UUID: 8d7949e6-de2a-4c34-9040-89c858ff0249
ORCID for Marco Alfano: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5491-2054

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Nov 2025 17:33
Last modified: 26 Nov 2025 03:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Marco Alfano ORCID iD
Author: Neeru Gupta

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×