A normalised framework for the Zero Emissions Commitment
A normalised framework for the Zero Emissions Commitment
The Zero Emissions Commitment (ZEC) measures the transient climate response after carbon emissions cease, defined by whether there is a continued rise or decrease in global surface temperature. This delayed climate response affects the maximum cumulative carbon emission to avoid exceeding a warming target. In a set of 9 Earth system models following an idealised atmospheric CO2 scenario with a cumulative emission of 1000 Pg C, the ZEC after 50 years ranges from −0.3 to 0.28 °C with a model mean of −0.11 °C and standard deviation of 0.19 °C. In order to understand these different climate responses, a normalised framework is introduced that quantifies the relative importance of carbon, radiative and thermal drivers of the ZEC. Inter-model differences in the ZEC are primarily due to differences in the radiative response, planetary heat uptake and the land carbon sink, with more minor contributions from differences in the ocean carbon sink and climate feedback. The ZEC response is controlled by opposing-signed contributions: (i) cooling from a decrease in radiative forcing from a carbon contribution due to increasing land and ocean carbon uptake, versus (ii) surface warming from a thermal contribution involving a decline in the fraction of radiative forcing used for planetary heat uptake plus possible amplification by climate feedback. The carbon contribution to the ZEC depends on the increase in the ocean carbon sink and whether the land carbon sink either increases or saturates in time. The thermal contribution to the ZEC depends upon how radiative forcing is partitioned between planetary heat uptake and radiative response with the radiative response either declining in time or remaining constant. These inferences as to the controls of the ZEC broadly carry over for diagnostics for a large ensemble, observationally-constrained, efficient Earth system model using two different emission scenarios to reach net zero. The large set of ensembles reveal a partial compensation between the changes in landborne and oceanborne fractions, as well as including ensembles with a greater range in amplification of warming by climate feedbacks.
Williams, Richard
4fa8f460-9b71-4058-9b54-89bd916b5f43
Goodwin, Philip
87dbb154-5c39-473a-8121-c794487ee1fd
Ceppi, Paulo
793c245e-40db-4524-ac97-dd4da0f16e98
Jones, Chris D.
2e73fcd8-1125-496b-81cc-46bf393c326e
MacDougall, Andrew
9454e4a3-5419-463b-98a4-6866b7fd26bb
Williams, Richard
4fa8f460-9b71-4058-9b54-89bd916b5f43
Goodwin, Philip
87dbb154-5c39-473a-8121-c794487ee1fd
Ceppi, Paulo
793c245e-40db-4524-ac97-dd4da0f16e98
Jones, Chris D.
2e73fcd8-1125-496b-81cc-46bf393c326e
MacDougall, Andrew
9454e4a3-5419-463b-98a4-6866b7fd26bb
Williams, Richard, Goodwin, Philip, Ceppi, Paulo, Jones, Chris D. and MacDougall, Andrew
(2025)
A normalised framework for the Zero Emissions Commitment.
Biogeosciences, 22 (22).
(doi:10.5194/bg-22-7167-2025).
Abstract
The Zero Emissions Commitment (ZEC) measures the transient climate response after carbon emissions cease, defined by whether there is a continued rise or decrease in global surface temperature. This delayed climate response affects the maximum cumulative carbon emission to avoid exceeding a warming target. In a set of 9 Earth system models following an idealised atmospheric CO2 scenario with a cumulative emission of 1000 Pg C, the ZEC after 50 years ranges from −0.3 to 0.28 °C with a model mean of −0.11 °C and standard deviation of 0.19 °C. In order to understand these different climate responses, a normalised framework is introduced that quantifies the relative importance of carbon, radiative and thermal drivers of the ZEC. Inter-model differences in the ZEC are primarily due to differences in the radiative response, planetary heat uptake and the land carbon sink, with more minor contributions from differences in the ocean carbon sink and climate feedback. The ZEC response is controlled by opposing-signed contributions: (i) cooling from a decrease in radiative forcing from a carbon contribution due to increasing land and ocean carbon uptake, versus (ii) surface warming from a thermal contribution involving a decline in the fraction of radiative forcing used for planetary heat uptake plus possible amplification by climate feedback. The carbon contribution to the ZEC depends on the increase in the ocean carbon sink and whether the land carbon sink either increases or saturates in time. The thermal contribution to the ZEC depends upon how radiative forcing is partitioned between planetary heat uptake and radiative response with the radiative response either declining in time or remaining constant. These inferences as to the controls of the ZEC broadly carry over for diagnostics for a large ensemble, observationally-constrained, efficient Earth system model using two different emission scenarios to reach net zero. The large set of ensembles reveal a partial compensation between the changes in landborne and oceanborne fractions, as well as including ensembles with a greater range in amplification of warming by climate feedbacks.
Text
bg-22-7167-2025
- Version of Record
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 November 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 507045
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507045
ISSN: 1726-4170
PURE UUID: b3a5b97a-913f-4ded-b2f7-16d6989f8ac5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Nov 2025 18:02
Last modified: 29 Nov 2025 02:44
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Richard Williams
Author:
Paulo Ceppi
Author:
Chris D. Jones
Author:
Andrew MacDougall
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics