The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The YouTube star: exploring the potential democratisation of stardom in the digital landscape through convergence

The YouTube star: exploring the potential democratisation of stardom in the digital landscape through convergence
The YouTube star: exploring the potential democratisation of stardom in the digital landscape through convergence
This thesis aims to explore the concept of the YouTube star, their development, and how their presence in the digital landscape potentially disrupts as well as restructures understandings about stardom. Looking at early YouTube before Google’s acquisition through the channel Smosh, YouTube after monetisation through Lilly Singh, the subsequent tension after this monetisation between corporate media and its grassroots creators through PewDiePie, later opulent wealth thanks to this monetisation through MrBeast, and liveness in the context of COVID-19 through Valkyrae and CORPSE HUSBAND, this thesis follows YouTube’s development largely chronologically. I argue that YouTube stars both mimic and go against traditional star ideals in several ways, converging the ideas of new media stardom and old media stardom. In the early years of the platform, YouTubers presented themselves as ordinary, grassroots, and authentic. Anyone had the potential to not only create content on YouTube but also gain a returning audience. No longer were stars manufactured by the media industry to be an ideal for certain dominant societal values (such as capitalism and patriarchy); instead, they were chosen by the audience and self-made. This led, potentially, to the democratisation of the star. However, after Google’s acquisition, these stars slowly were able to rise in wealth, leading to more professional equipment and teams around themselves such as writers, makeup artists, hairstylists, personal assistants and managers, granting them the potential to present themselves as more professional and glamourous, furthering the bridge between the audience and the star in question. Moreover, these same ordinary stars were beginning to be seen in traditional media spaces, such as films, red-carpets, late-night talk shows and magazine articles. I also question who amongst these YouTubers are being uplifted to such points of fame. Although anyone can upload to the platform, some creators are promoted on the site more than others, be that on the YouTube homepage, YouTube’s Twitter/X account, or in real life, such as in their 2018 billboard campaign. Furthermore, traditional stars, that is film and television stars, are themselves engaging on these same sites, bringing their persona back down to earth so to relate to their audience and appear more authentic.
University of Southampton
McDonald, Lucy Elizabeth
7779fd78-b430-40ae-a8f5-0d313ab4f534
McDonald, Lucy Elizabeth
7779fd78-b430-40ae-a8f5-0d313ab4f534
Bull, Sofia
67e74291-8c1f-409e-8c84-0416544992b7
Williams, Michael
fdd5b778-38f1-4529-b99c-9d41ab749576

McDonald, Lucy Elizabeth (2025) The YouTube star: exploring the potential democratisation of stardom in the digital landscape through convergence. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This thesis aims to explore the concept of the YouTube star, their development, and how their presence in the digital landscape potentially disrupts as well as restructures understandings about stardom. Looking at early YouTube before Google’s acquisition through the channel Smosh, YouTube after monetisation through Lilly Singh, the subsequent tension after this monetisation between corporate media and its grassroots creators through PewDiePie, later opulent wealth thanks to this monetisation through MrBeast, and liveness in the context of COVID-19 through Valkyrae and CORPSE HUSBAND, this thesis follows YouTube’s development largely chronologically. I argue that YouTube stars both mimic and go against traditional star ideals in several ways, converging the ideas of new media stardom and old media stardom. In the early years of the platform, YouTubers presented themselves as ordinary, grassroots, and authentic. Anyone had the potential to not only create content on YouTube but also gain a returning audience. No longer were stars manufactured by the media industry to be an ideal for certain dominant societal values (such as capitalism and patriarchy); instead, they were chosen by the audience and self-made. This led, potentially, to the democratisation of the star. However, after Google’s acquisition, these stars slowly were able to rise in wealth, leading to more professional equipment and teams around themselves such as writers, makeup artists, hairstylists, personal assistants and managers, granting them the potential to present themselves as more professional and glamourous, furthering the bridge between the audience and the star in question. Moreover, these same ordinary stars were beginning to be seen in traditional media spaces, such as films, red-carpets, late-night talk shows and magazine articles. I also question who amongst these YouTubers are being uplifted to such points of fame. Although anyone can upload to the platform, some creators are promoted on the site more than others, be that on the YouTube homepage, YouTube’s Twitter/X account, or in real life, such as in their 2018 billboard campaign. Furthermore, traditional stars, that is film and television stars, are themselves engaging on these same sites, bringing their persona back down to earth so to relate to their audience and appear more authentic.

Text
McDonald Lucy Elizabeth PhD Thesis 2025
Restricted to Repository staff only until 17 November 2026.
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Miss-Lucy-McDonald-resubmission-
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507053
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507053
PURE UUID: d13b8c9e-9b30-4e68-8779-7b9f287b103f
ORCID for Michael Williams: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5386-5567

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Nov 2025 18:05
Last modified: 26 Nov 2025 02:37

Export record

Contributors

Thesis advisor: Sofia Bull
Thesis advisor: Michael Williams ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×