The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The role of extended audit reports in enhancing goodwill impairment recognition: evidence from UK firms

The role of extended audit reports in enhancing goodwill impairment recognition: evidence from UK firms
The role of extended audit reports in enhancing goodwill impairment recognition: evidence from UK firms
Purpose: the purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the extended audit report (EAR) on the recognition and timeliness of goodwill impairment in the UK. Specifically, this study explores whether EAR adoption enhances financial reporting quality by improving the alignment between impairment recognition and firms’ underlying performance, especially when goodwill impairment is identified as a key audit matter (KAM).

Design/methodology/approach: drawing on agency and accountability theories, this study analyses 1,451 firm-year observations from 347 non-financial UK companies listed on the FTSE All Shares index over a three-year period around EAR adoption. Tobit, Logit, Balanced Matching and OLS regression techniques are used to test the hypotheses, with fixed effects and extensive robustness checks addressing concerns related to endogeneity, measurement validity and model specification.

Findings: the findings of this study show that EAR adoption significantly improves the timeliness of goodwill impairment recognition by strengthening the association between poor firm performance and reported impairments. This relationship is further amplified when goodwill impairment is flagged as a KAM, particularly in cases where auditors perceive it as a high-risk issue. In contrast, the volume of disclosure does not appear to enhance recognition, suggesting that disclosure quality and perceived risk matter more than disclosure length.

Practical implications: the results of this study underscore the role of EAR as an accountability mechanism that enhances auditor scrutiny and constrains managerial discretion in high-risk, judgment-intensive areas. Regulators and standard setters may consider encouraging more targeted, risk-based disclosures to strengthen audit effectiveness. Companies and auditors should also recognise the behavioural impact of KAM disclosures on managerial reporting incentives.

Originality/value: this study contributes new archival evidence on how EARs influence auditor and managerial behaviour in the context of goodwill impairment. By integrating agency and accountability theories and focusing on a complex reporting area, this study refines understanding of how expanded audit disclosures improve financial reporting outcomes and mitigate agency conflicts.
1834-7649
948-976
Elmahgoub, Mohamed
bf66be6b-835d-42c0-97cd-ec717922c916
Smith, Julia A.
5af43479-f4ba-4b3d-83b8-0c3ce940c3b9
Elamer, Ahmed A.
ea9479b7-b451-424a-accc-451304d92de6
Abdelfattah, Tarek
c40f4483-bbd8-4666-b842-1e4a0429f304
Elmahgoub, Mohamed
bf66be6b-835d-42c0-97cd-ec717922c916
Smith, Julia A.
5af43479-f4ba-4b3d-83b8-0c3ce940c3b9
Elamer, Ahmed A.
ea9479b7-b451-424a-accc-451304d92de6
Abdelfattah, Tarek
c40f4483-bbd8-4666-b842-1e4a0429f304

Elmahgoub, Mohamed, Smith, Julia A., Elamer, Ahmed A. and Abdelfattah, Tarek (2025) The role of extended audit reports in enhancing goodwill impairment recognition: evidence from UK firms. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 33 (5), 948-976. (doi:10.1108/IJAIM-11-2024-0441).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: the purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the extended audit report (EAR) on the recognition and timeliness of goodwill impairment in the UK. Specifically, this study explores whether EAR adoption enhances financial reporting quality by improving the alignment between impairment recognition and firms’ underlying performance, especially when goodwill impairment is identified as a key audit matter (KAM).

Design/methodology/approach: drawing on agency and accountability theories, this study analyses 1,451 firm-year observations from 347 non-financial UK companies listed on the FTSE All Shares index over a three-year period around EAR adoption. Tobit, Logit, Balanced Matching and OLS regression techniques are used to test the hypotheses, with fixed effects and extensive robustness checks addressing concerns related to endogeneity, measurement validity and model specification.

Findings: the findings of this study show that EAR adoption significantly improves the timeliness of goodwill impairment recognition by strengthening the association between poor firm performance and reported impairments. This relationship is further amplified when goodwill impairment is flagged as a KAM, particularly in cases where auditors perceive it as a high-risk issue. In contrast, the volume of disclosure does not appear to enhance recognition, suggesting that disclosure quality and perceived risk matter more than disclosure length.

Practical implications: the results of this study underscore the role of EAR as an accountability mechanism that enhances auditor scrutiny and constrains managerial discretion in high-risk, judgment-intensive areas. Regulators and standard setters may consider encouraging more targeted, risk-based disclosures to strengthen audit effectiveness. Companies and auditors should also recognise the behavioural impact of KAM disclosures on managerial reporting incentives.

Originality/value: this study contributes new archival evidence on how EARs influence auditor and managerial behaviour in the context of goodwill impairment. By integrating agency and accountability theories and focusing on a complex reporting area, this study refines understanding of how expanded audit disclosures improve financial reporting outcomes and mitigate agency conflicts.

Text
Acceptedversion22.08.2025 - Accepted Manuscript
Download (770kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 August 2025
Published date: 7 October 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507063
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507063
ISSN: 1834-7649
PURE UUID: 9b416857-0a92-49ea-ab23-27c0ff4c95bc

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Nov 2025 17:40
Last modified: 26 Nov 2025 17:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Julia A. Smith
Author: Ahmed A. Elamer
Author: Tarek Abdelfattah

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×