The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparative adssessment and deployment of Zeolites, MOFs, and activated carbons for CO2 capture and geological sequestration applications

Comparative adssessment and deployment of Zeolites, MOFs, and activated carbons for CO2 capture and geological sequestration applications
Comparative adssessment and deployment of Zeolites, MOFs, and activated carbons for CO2 capture and geological sequestration applications
The rising level of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is a major driver of climate change, highlighting the need to develop carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies quickly. This paper offers a comparative review of three main groups of porous adsorbent materials—zeolites, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), and activated carbons—for their roles in CO2 capture and long-term storage. By examining their structural features, adsorption capacities, moisture stability, and economic viability, the strengths and weaknesses of each material are assessed. Additionally, five different methods for delivering these materials into depleted oil and gas reservoirs are discussed: direct suspension injection, polymer-assisted transport, foam-assisted delivery, encapsulation with controlled release, and preformed particle gels. The potential of hybrid systems, such as MOF–carbon composites and polymer-functionalized materials, is also examined for improved selectivity and durability in underground environments. This research aims to connect materials science with subsurface engineering, helping guide the selection and use of adsorbent materials in real-world CCS applications. The findings support the optimization of CCS deployment and contribute to broader climate change efforts and the goal of achieving net-zero emissions. Key findings include CO2 adsorption capacities of 3.5–8.0 mmol/g and surface areas up to 7000 m2/g, with MOFs demonstrating the highest uptake and activated carbons offering cost-effective performance.
activated carbons, carbon capture, delivery mechanisms, geological sequestration, hybrid materials, metal–organic frameworks, zeolites
2411-5134
Hamadama Mouctar, Mohamadou Zoubeirou
9aa593e3-5cc8-4f91-aca8-6b17e09e5ff5
Hassan, Mohamed G
ce323212-f178-4d72-85cf-23cd30605cd8
Bimbo, Nuno
53d9fc24-e2c1-4e2d-8d75-8dc640d8adda
Abbas, Syed Zaheer
3b02900e-fef6-40e1-acf7-96f26bfde4a8
Shigidi, Ihab
c6909a31-6709-45db-8247-3fe1b573753b
Hamadama Mouctar, Mohamadou Zoubeirou
9aa593e3-5cc8-4f91-aca8-6b17e09e5ff5
Hassan, Mohamed G
ce323212-f178-4d72-85cf-23cd30605cd8
Bimbo, Nuno
53d9fc24-e2c1-4e2d-8d75-8dc640d8adda
Abbas, Syed Zaheer
3b02900e-fef6-40e1-acf7-96f26bfde4a8
Shigidi, Ihab
c6909a31-6709-45db-8247-3fe1b573753b

Hamadama Mouctar, Mohamadou Zoubeirou, Hassan, Mohamed G, Bimbo, Nuno, Abbas, Syed Zaheer and Shigidi, Ihab (2025) Comparative adssessment and deployment of Zeolites, MOFs, and activated carbons for CO2 capture and geological sequestration applications. Inventions, 10 (5), [78]. (doi:10.3390/inventions10050078).

Record type: Review

Abstract

The rising level of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is a major driver of climate change, highlighting the need to develop carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies quickly. This paper offers a comparative review of three main groups of porous adsorbent materials—zeolites, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), and activated carbons—for their roles in CO2 capture and long-term storage. By examining their structural features, adsorption capacities, moisture stability, and economic viability, the strengths and weaknesses of each material are assessed. Additionally, five different methods for delivering these materials into depleted oil and gas reservoirs are discussed: direct suspension injection, polymer-assisted transport, foam-assisted delivery, encapsulation with controlled release, and preformed particle gels. The potential of hybrid systems, such as MOF–carbon composites and polymer-functionalized materials, is also examined for improved selectivity and durability in underground environments. This research aims to connect materials science with subsurface engineering, helping guide the selection and use of adsorbent materials in real-world CCS applications. The findings support the optimization of CCS deployment and contribute to broader climate change efforts and the goal of achieving net-zero emissions. Key findings include CO2 adsorption capacities of 3.5–8.0 mmol/g and surface areas up to 7000 m2/g, with MOFs demonstrating the highest uptake and activated carbons offering cost-effective performance.

Text
inventions-10-00078 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 August 2025
Published date: 28 August 2025
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2025 by the authors.
Keywords: activated carbons, carbon capture, delivery mechanisms, geological sequestration, hybrid materials, metal–organic frameworks, zeolites

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507107
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507107
ISSN: 2411-5134
PURE UUID: e7b77600-08f1-422f-be25-195d01983f08
ORCID for Mohamed G Hassan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3729-4543
ORCID for Nuno Bimbo: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8740-8284
ORCID for Syed Zaheer Abbas: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8783-8572

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Nov 2025 17:33
Last modified: 28 Nov 2025 03:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mohamadou Zoubeirou Hamadama Mouctar
Author: Nuno Bimbo ORCID iD
Author: Syed Zaheer Abbas ORCID iD
Author: Ihab Shigidi

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×