The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Weekly versus daily bathing for people with eczema: results of the Eczema Bathing online randomised controlled trial

Weekly versus daily bathing for people with eczema: results of the Eczema Bathing online randomised controlled trial
Weekly versus daily bathing for people with eczema: results of the Eczema Bathing online randomised controlled trial
Background: questions about washing are a high priority for people with eczema (syn. atopic dermatitis, atopic eczema) but are rarely the focus of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Objectives: to assess the impact of weekly bathing compared to daily bathing in people with eczema in the first of a series of eczema citizen science online trials in the United Kingdom.

Methods: pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group superiority RCT. People with self-reported eczema aged ≥1 were eligible, excluding those with very mild eczema (Patient Orientated Eczema Measure (POEM) score ≤ 2). Participants were allocated (1:1) using minimisation, balancing on eczema severity (POEM), age and usual method of bathing, to either the weekly bathing group (bath or shower once or twice a week) or the daily bathing group (≥6 times a week) for 4 weeks. Participants were not blinded to their allocation. Primary outcome was participant reported eczema symptoms collected weekly over four weeks using POEM (range 0 to 28, higher scores more severe).

Results: 438 people with eczema (108 aged <16 years) were randomised between 29th January and 8th July 2024: 218 to daily bathing and 220 to weekly bathing. The primary analysis included 195 participants (89%) allocated to daily bathing and 193 (88%) to weekly bathing who completed at least one follow-up questionnaire. Mean POEM scores at baseline, 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks, were 14.5 [standard deviation 5.7], 11.7 [5.9], 12.2 [5.9], 11.7 [6.7] and 11.6 [6.5], respectively, in the daily bathing group, and 14.9 [6.3], 12.1 [6.8], 11.3 [6.7], 10.5 [7.0] and 10.6 [7.2] in the weekly bathing group. The adjusted difference in mean POEM score over 4 weeks for weekly versus daily bathing was -0.4 (95% confidence interval -1.3 to 0.4, p = 0.30). Process evaluation data highlighted participants’ experiences of making changes to bathing routines, including barriers to following the allocated routine. No serious unintended effects or harms were reported.

Conclusions: the trial found no evidence of a difference in eczema symptoms between bathing or showering weekly compared to daily. These results are helpful for people with eczema, giving them the freedom to choose what suits them best.
0007-0963
Bradshaw, Lucy
bd0f658d-266a-4c6c-b89e-33cac37933e9
Howells, Laura M.
38dfc46e-282a-4bb6-8370-b0c35f9a397a
Muller, Ingrid
2569bf42-51bd-40da-bbfd-dd4dbbd62cad
Mitchell, Eleanor J.
975abf4b-e43a-4c80-bc29-1bbe93ad4c57
Baker, Arabella
ed797ac6-c163-4cb5-b181-def53e1fc0f3
Thuma, Leila
32cfcb67-5333-4f9f-a0c1-846c86b6c779
Harrison, Eleanor F.
7dd85038-2791-4f9c-b216-f3bee4a27c05
Hartshorne, Liz
2f4c962d-f308-4e8b-9360-021aca73c337
Jiang, Yimin
c6a51bde-040b-4e80-9e9c-a488a300266e
Cowdell, Fiona
42445fcb-cb89-4c68-a50b-1ab9fa350d90
Leighton, Paul
1523b89f-2524-4b3c-8eae-8482f0553900
Montgomery, Alan A.
fc510209-3c5f-405c-a9d5-3edf4087316e
Ravenscroft, Jane
7a08abec-a404-43db-8be5-16ca31659bf6
Ridd, Matthew J.
e1bb458b-7c42-4bc0-9462-ce9341c66925
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Tanaka, Reiko J.
c01f5e69-33a4-4308-993d-28ab96fab561
Hilken, Nicholas
b8c2b1a0-6222-48ad-a5ca-7c98e4da2c71
Swinden, Richard
a0df65c5-0ec3-4064-8b4b-323586fa50c2
Dooley, Richard
0612e9aa-52fd-4c95-baa3-d533af8f8af6
Layfield, Carron
86ca63a4-1bc2-43de-9a70-720fdd36efa6
Campbell, Emma L.
d4217ba0-9832-4620-ab3e-ac2865179cde
Tutt, Lydia
cacdc7f0-8c4d-417c-a5f1-0add9686baee
Collins, Sophia
cfa3293e-1105-46b4-9bec-de9ab4b547b4
Rogers, Natasha K.
abc8ecfd-6f10-46a1-85e6-c1bf306f835b
Clement, Kate
b1ba315c-8131-427c-b4b6-14f3030466aa
Davies, Firoza
1406eb48-fafd-4308-b955-77e6dc1de98a
Owen, Tracy
a5806879-dec1-4b93-ad2c-3acda7ea2257
Eddis-Finbow, Mars
61178c0a-f968-444c-8455-98439edf85aa
Patel, Devin
06d6d575-3383-4b81-909c-e3705cb54f75
Putrym, Goldie
346ecbde-d427-40e2-b34b-7d18266a494c
Foulds, Aaron
36a56b6e-8989-449f-a7dc-bc22cc65a5f7
Williams, Hywel C.
385a3b79-91ef-4648-b1d4-220e2cb99878
Roberts, Amanda
c66f6c07-799f-42ac-aee3-261f8c48e584
Thomas, Kim S.
41ea8d03-acf6-44d8-95d3-76905f1586e5
et al.
Bradshaw, Lucy
bd0f658d-266a-4c6c-b89e-33cac37933e9
Howells, Laura M.
38dfc46e-282a-4bb6-8370-b0c35f9a397a
Muller, Ingrid
2569bf42-51bd-40da-bbfd-dd4dbbd62cad
Mitchell, Eleanor J.
975abf4b-e43a-4c80-bc29-1bbe93ad4c57
Baker, Arabella
ed797ac6-c163-4cb5-b181-def53e1fc0f3
Thuma, Leila
32cfcb67-5333-4f9f-a0c1-846c86b6c779
Harrison, Eleanor F.
7dd85038-2791-4f9c-b216-f3bee4a27c05
Hartshorne, Liz
2f4c962d-f308-4e8b-9360-021aca73c337
Jiang, Yimin
c6a51bde-040b-4e80-9e9c-a488a300266e
Cowdell, Fiona
42445fcb-cb89-4c68-a50b-1ab9fa350d90
Leighton, Paul
1523b89f-2524-4b3c-8eae-8482f0553900
Montgomery, Alan A.
fc510209-3c5f-405c-a9d5-3edf4087316e
Ravenscroft, Jane
7a08abec-a404-43db-8be5-16ca31659bf6
Ridd, Matthew J.
e1bb458b-7c42-4bc0-9462-ce9341c66925
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Tanaka, Reiko J.
c01f5e69-33a4-4308-993d-28ab96fab561
Hilken, Nicholas
b8c2b1a0-6222-48ad-a5ca-7c98e4da2c71
Swinden, Richard
a0df65c5-0ec3-4064-8b4b-323586fa50c2
Dooley, Richard
0612e9aa-52fd-4c95-baa3-d533af8f8af6
Layfield, Carron
86ca63a4-1bc2-43de-9a70-720fdd36efa6
Campbell, Emma L.
d4217ba0-9832-4620-ab3e-ac2865179cde
Tutt, Lydia
cacdc7f0-8c4d-417c-a5f1-0add9686baee
Collins, Sophia
cfa3293e-1105-46b4-9bec-de9ab4b547b4
Rogers, Natasha K.
abc8ecfd-6f10-46a1-85e6-c1bf306f835b
Clement, Kate
b1ba315c-8131-427c-b4b6-14f3030466aa
Davies, Firoza
1406eb48-fafd-4308-b955-77e6dc1de98a
Owen, Tracy
a5806879-dec1-4b93-ad2c-3acda7ea2257
Eddis-Finbow, Mars
61178c0a-f968-444c-8455-98439edf85aa
Patel, Devin
06d6d575-3383-4b81-909c-e3705cb54f75
Putrym, Goldie
346ecbde-d427-40e2-b34b-7d18266a494c
Foulds, Aaron
36a56b6e-8989-449f-a7dc-bc22cc65a5f7
Williams, Hywel C.
385a3b79-91ef-4648-b1d4-220e2cb99878
Roberts, Amanda
c66f6c07-799f-42ac-aee3-261f8c48e584
Thomas, Kim S.
41ea8d03-acf6-44d8-95d3-76905f1586e5

Bradshaw, Lucy, Howells, Laura M. and Muller, Ingrid , et al. (2025) Weekly versus daily bathing for people with eczema: results of the Eczema Bathing online randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Dermatology, [ljaf417]. (doi:10.1093/bjd/ljaf417).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: questions about washing are a high priority for people with eczema (syn. atopic dermatitis, atopic eczema) but are rarely the focus of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Objectives: to assess the impact of weekly bathing compared to daily bathing in people with eczema in the first of a series of eczema citizen science online trials in the United Kingdom.

Methods: pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group superiority RCT. People with self-reported eczema aged ≥1 were eligible, excluding those with very mild eczema (Patient Orientated Eczema Measure (POEM) score ≤ 2). Participants were allocated (1:1) using minimisation, balancing on eczema severity (POEM), age and usual method of bathing, to either the weekly bathing group (bath or shower once or twice a week) or the daily bathing group (≥6 times a week) for 4 weeks. Participants were not blinded to their allocation. Primary outcome was participant reported eczema symptoms collected weekly over four weeks using POEM (range 0 to 28, higher scores more severe).

Results: 438 people with eczema (108 aged <16 years) were randomised between 29th January and 8th July 2024: 218 to daily bathing and 220 to weekly bathing. The primary analysis included 195 participants (89%) allocated to daily bathing and 193 (88%) to weekly bathing who completed at least one follow-up questionnaire. Mean POEM scores at baseline, 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks, were 14.5 [standard deviation 5.7], 11.7 [5.9], 12.2 [5.9], 11.7 [6.7] and 11.6 [6.5], respectively, in the daily bathing group, and 14.9 [6.3], 12.1 [6.8], 11.3 [6.7], 10.5 [7.0] and 10.6 [7.2] in the weekly bathing group. The adjusted difference in mean POEM score over 4 weeks for weekly versus daily bathing was -0.4 (95% confidence interval -1.3 to 0.4, p = 0.30). Process evaluation data highlighted participants’ experiences of making changes to bathing routines, including barriers to following the allocated routine. No serious unintended effects or harms were reported.

Conclusions: the trial found no evidence of a difference in eczema symptoms between bathing or showering weekly compared to daily. These results are helpful for people with eczema, giving them the freedom to choose what suits them best.

Text
ljaf417 - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (753kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 October 2025
Published date: 10 November 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507112
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507112
ISSN: 0007-0963
PURE UUID: 167af3d1-c71f-463a-b02f-b1b6cee0a602
ORCID for Ingrid Muller: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9341-6133
ORCID for Miriam Santer: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7264-5260

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Nov 2025 17:36
Last modified: 28 Nov 2025 02:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lucy Bradshaw
Author: Laura M. Howells
Author: Ingrid Muller ORCID iD
Author: Eleanor J. Mitchell
Author: Arabella Baker
Author: Leila Thuma
Author: Eleanor F. Harrison
Author: Liz Hartshorne
Author: Yimin Jiang
Author: Fiona Cowdell
Author: Paul Leighton
Author: Alan A. Montgomery
Author: Jane Ravenscroft
Author: Matthew J. Ridd
Author: Miriam Santer ORCID iD
Author: Reiko J. Tanaka
Author: Nicholas Hilken
Author: Richard Swinden
Author: Richard Dooley
Author: Carron Layfield
Author: Emma L. Campbell
Author: Lydia Tutt
Author: Sophia Collins
Author: Natasha K. Rogers
Author: Kate Clement
Author: Firoza Davies
Author: Tracy Owen
Author: Mars Eddis-Finbow
Author: Devin Patel
Author: Goldie Putrym
Author: Aaron Foulds
Author: Hywel C. Williams
Author: Amanda Roberts
Author: Kim S. Thomas
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×