An analytical lower bound for a class of minimizing quadratic integer optimization problems
An analytical lower bound for a class of minimizing quadratic integer optimization problems
Lower bounds for minimization problems are essential for convergence of both branching-based and iterative solution methods for optimization problems. They also serve an important role in evaluating the quality of feasible solutions by providing conservative optimality gaps. We derive a closed-form analytical lower bound for a class of quadratic optimization problems with binary decision variables. Unlike traditional lower bounds obtained by solving relaxed models, our bound is purely analytical and does not require numerically solving any optimization problem. This is particularly valuable for problem instances that are too large to even formulate or load into a solver due to memory limitations. Further, we propose a greedy heuristic for obtaining feasible solutions. Together, the analytical bound and heuristic provide a provable optimality gap without solving any optimization model. Numerical experiments demonstrate that we can solve real-world large-scale instances, that were previously unsolvable due to memory limitations, in under a minute with provable optimality gaps of under 7%. For smaller instances where the optimal solution is computable, our greedy solutions are about 1% away from the optimal. These results highlight the practical value and scalability of our approach when direct solution methods are computationally prohibitive.
Analytical bounds, Facility location models, Lower bounds, Non-convex, Quadratic integer optimization
672-683
Schmitt, Christian
bfcc8f5c-f77d-428c-8890-22a530a59526
Singh, Bismark
9d3fc6cb-f55e-4562-9d5f-42f9a3ddd9a1
1 February 2026
Schmitt, Christian
bfcc8f5c-f77d-428c-8890-22a530a59526
Singh, Bismark
9d3fc6cb-f55e-4562-9d5f-42f9a3ddd9a1
Schmitt, Christian and Singh, Bismark
(2026)
An analytical lower bound for a class of minimizing quadratic integer optimization problems.
Discrete Applied Mathematics, 380, .
(doi:10.1016/j.dam.2025.10.040).
Abstract
Lower bounds for minimization problems are essential for convergence of both branching-based and iterative solution methods for optimization problems. They also serve an important role in evaluating the quality of feasible solutions by providing conservative optimality gaps. We derive a closed-form analytical lower bound for a class of quadratic optimization problems with binary decision variables. Unlike traditional lower bounds obtained by solving relaxed models, our bound is purely analytical and does not require numerically solving any optimization problem. This is particularly valuable for problem instances that are too large to even formulate or load into a solver due to memory limitations. Further, we propose a greedy heuristic for obtaining feasible solutions. Together, the analytical bound and heuristic provide a provable optimality gap without solving any optimization model. Numerical experiments demonstrate that we can solve real-world large-scale instances, that were previously unsolvable due to memory limitations, in under a minute with provable optimality gaps of under 7%. For smaller instances where the optimal solution is computable, our greedy solutions are about 1% away from the optimal. These results highlight the practical value and scalability of our approach when direct solution methods are computationally prohibitive.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 22 October 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 November 2025
Published date: 1 February 2026
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s).
Keywords:
Analytical bounds, Facility location models, Lower bounds, Non-convex, Quadratic integer optimization
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 507141
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507141
ISSN: 0166-218X
PURE UUID: e26181b4-3dd5-447c-a504-4677bb268a16
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Nov 2025 17:54
Last modified: 28 Nov 2025 03:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Christian Schmitt
Author:
Bismark Singh
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics