Flooding the feed: the politics of social media sharing among defensive publics
Flooding the feed: the politics of social media sharing among defensive publics
What political significance do widely-shared sources on social media carry? Efforts at documenting media content have produced useful insights about political phenomena, including right-wing populist movements that have recently been theorized as comprising defensive publics which seek to preserve social, economic, and cultural hierarchies that privilege white “nationals.” In France, the concept of defensive publics is particularly useful for understanding how right-wing identitarian and nationalist actors use social media to mobilize publics to defend hierarchies framed as under siege by immigration, multiculturalism, and global liberal elites. Building on literature about illiberal communication and the illiberal public sphere, we argue that patterns of sources’ visibility – not just content – also serve defensive purposes. Using computational analysis of 1.16 million French language immigration-related posts on Twitter/X and ideological embeddings of 44,810 of these users, we show how far-right-leaning users flood feeds with hyper-partisan sources, particularly on immigration, although they also share ideologically varied sources. Then, interviews with 13 high-profile far-right-affiliated posters who include senior French politicians reveal how these practices support defensive political aims. Sharing hyper-partisan sources outside the “elitist” mainstream redresses perceived censorship by mainstream media, while sharing mainstream sources signals credibility and respectability, even as these actors maintain critiques of the very same media. Meanwhile, reposting sources with statistical and quantitative evidence serves to obscure overtly white supremacist ideologies while advancing anti-immigration agendas. We conclude that sharing practices themselves function as rhetorical resources that highly-visible members of defensive publics use to reassert symbolic and political dominance in a contested media environment.
Tittel, Katharina
6d5b1830-a93f-4ca7-97f0-b819d087ffcd
Allen, William
f0d4731a-81c1-4886-b11c-74dfa412bb97
Ramaciotti, Pedro
8135b749-2773-464e-a0fe-c9965498ddaa
Tittel, Katharina
6d5b1830-a93f-4ca7-97f0-b819d087ffcd
Allen, William
f0d4731a-81c1-4886-b11c-74dfa412bb97
Ramaciotti, Pedro
8135b749-2773-464e-a0fe-c9965498ddaa
Tittel, Katharina, Allen, William and Ramaciotti, Pedro
(2025)
Flooding the feed: the politics of social media sharing among defensive publics.
Political Communication.
(doi:10.1080/10584609.2025.2588248).
Abstract
What political significance do widely-shared sources on social media carry? Efforts at documenting media content have produced useful insights about political phenomena, including right-wing populist movements that have recently been theorized as comprising defensive publics which seek to preserve social, economic, and cultural hierarchies that privilege white “nationals.” In France, the concept of defensive publics is particularly useful for understanding how right-wing identitarian and nationalist actors use social media to mobilize publics to defend hierarchies framed as under siege by immigration, multiculturalism, and global liberal elites. Building on literature about illiberal communication and the illiberal public sphere, we argue that patterns of sources’ visibility – not just content – also serve defensive purposes. Using computational analysis of 1.16 million French language immigration-related posts on Twitter/X and ideological embeddings of 44,810 of these users, we show how far-right-leaning users flood feeds with hyper-partisan sources, particularly on immigration, although they also share ideologically varied sources. Then, interviews with 13 high-profile far-right-affiliated posters who include senior French politicians reveal how these practices support defensive political aims. Sharing hyper-partisan sources outside the “elitist” mainstream redresses perceived censorship by mainstream media, while sharing mainstream sources signals credibility and respectability, even as these actors maintain critiques of the very same media. Meanwhile, reposting sources with statistical and quantitative evidence serves to obscure overtly white supremacist ideologies while advancing anti-immigration agendas. We conclude that sharing practices themselves function as rhetorical resources that highly-visible members of defensive publics use to reassert symbolic and political dominance in a contested media environment.
Text
Flooding the Feed The Politics of Social Media Sharing Among Defensive Publics
- Version of Record
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 November 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 507164
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507164
ISSN: 1058-4609
PURE UUID: f8759b8f-c680-4527-a491-f6788b4bfbc5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Nov 2025 17:34
Last modified: 29 Nov 2025 03:08
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Katharina Tittel
Author:
William Allen
Author:
Pedro Ramaciotti
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics