The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Quality and user satisfaction scores for prosthetic limbs provided in a fitting camp, Cambodia

Quality and user satisfaction scores for prosthetic limbs provided in a fitting camp, Cambodia
Quality and user satisfaction scores for prosthetic limbs provided in a fitting camp, Cambodia
Objective: prosthetic limbs can enable mobility, independence and social participation. Fitting camps provide devices to many individuals in intensive sessions. This study addressed concerns regarding device design and fabrication at a fitting camp for 525 people in Cambodia.

Methods: we assessed device quality and satisfaction at prosthetic limb provision, and device usage and preference at 3-month follow-up.

Findings: many devices failed to meet International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics standards for usage, workmanship, and client satisfaction. Interviews revealed dissatisfaction with function (26%), workmanship (34%), and fit (56%). At follow-up, 36% of clients reported discomfort or pain. 80% with a previous prosthesis preferred it. 81% reported not very often, rarely, or never using their new device, whereas 87% of clients with a previous device reported often or always using it. 29% were using a previous device observed at the camp as unused, broken, painful, or poorly fitting, suggesting many rely on an inadequate or potentially dangerous prosthesis.

Conclusion: these findings indicate that shortcomings in quality and satisfaction of the studied prosthesis system persist, and raise new questions about inclusiveness of patient selection and effectiveness of funding use in the intensive delivery format. Inadequate training and aftercare may exacerbate these issues, burdening local rehabilitation services or leaving vulnerable clients without support. Camps may be more appropriate when need is clearly demonstrated, should integrate fully with existing services, and provide adequate materials and components for repairs. Screening patients for need is essential, as is engaging the practitioners who will continue with their care.
0042-9686
Heang, Thearith
ff11c9ef-722e-4427-bba1-0441a4390302
Kheng, Sisary
7cc2578a-530b-4cdf-b143-c19cf7d0bbf1
Donovan-Hall, Maggie
5f138055-2162-4982-846c-5c92411055e0
Channon, Andrew Amos
5a60607c-6861-4960-a81d-504169d5880c
Dickinson, Alex
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Harte, Carson
5758d515-8715-452f-949e-e0164de0dcbb
Heang, Thearith
ff11c9ef-722e-4427-bba1-0441a4390302
Kheng, Sisary
7cc2578a-530b-4cdf-b143-c19cf7d0bbf1
Donovan-Hall, Maggie
5f138055-2162-4982-846c-5c92411055e0
Channon, Andrew Amos
5a60607c-6861-4960-a81d-504169d5880c
Dickinson, Alex
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Harte, Carson
5758d515-8715-452f-949e-e0164de0dcbb

Heang, Thearith, Kheng, Sisary, Donovan-Hall, Maggie, Channon, Andrew Amos, Dickinson, Alex and Harte, Carson (2025) Quality and user satisfaction scores for prosthetic limbs provided in a fitting camp, Cambodia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, [BLT.25.294638]. (doi:10.2471/BLT.25.294638).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: prosthetic limbs can enable mobility, independence and social participation. Fitting camps provide devices to many individuals in intensive sessions. This study addressed concerns regarding device design and fabrication at a fitting camp for 525 people in Cambodia.

Methods: we assessed device quality and satisfaction at prosthetic limb provision, and device usage and preference at 3-month follow-up.

Findings: many devices failed to meet International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics standards for usage, workmanship, and client satisfaction. Interviews revealed dissatisfaction with function (26%), workmanship (34%), and fit (56%). At follow-up, 36% of clients reported discomfort or pain. 80% with a previous prosthesis preferred it. 81% reported not very often, rarely, or never using their new device, whereas 87% of clients with a previous device reported often or always using it. 29% were using a previous device observed at the camp as unused, broken, painful, or poorly fitting, suggesting many rely on an inadequate or potentially dangerous prosthesis.

Conclusion: these findings indicate that shortcomings in quality and satisfaction of the studied prosthesis system persist, and raise new questions about inclusiveness of patient selection and effectiveness of funding use in the intensive delivery format. Inadequate training and aftercare may exacerbate these issues, burdening local rehabilitation services or leaving vulnerable clients without support. Camps may be more appropriate when need is clearly demonstrated, should integrate fully with existing services, and provide adequate materials and components for repairs. Screening patients for need is essential, as is engaging the practitioners who will continue with their care.

Text
BLT-2025-294638v1 - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (506kB)
Text
blt.25.294638 - Proof
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 August 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 October 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507172
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507172
ISSN: 0042-9686
PURE UUID: 8afaa3b8-494e-4046-b613-84bf0e993e17
ORCID for Andrew Amos Channon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-0418
ORCID for Alex Dickinson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-1944

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Nov 2025 17:37
Last modified: 29 Nov 2025 02:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Thearith Heang
Author: Sisary Kheng
Author: Alex Dickinson ORCID iD
Author: Carson Harte

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×