The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Still the gold standard in survey research? Comparing face-to-face and self-completion data collection in a repeat cross-sectional general social survey in Great Britain

Still the gold standard in survey research? Comparing face-to-face and self-completion data collection in a repeat cross-sectional general social survey in Great Britain
Still the gold standard in survey research? Comparing face-to-face and self-completion data collection in a repeat cross-sectional general social survey in Great Britain
Surveys aim to provide estimates of the behaviour, social conditions, or attitudes for the population they seek to represent. Since modern surveys of the general population were first established, the best way to collect high quality data was felt to be via face-to-face interviews amongst probability samples of households or individuals. However, more recently, face-to-face data collection in Great Britain has been impacted by declining response rates, increasing evidence of interviewer effects, rising costs and a reduction in the number of providers. At the same time, self-completion surveys in Great Britain offer an increasingly convincing alternative to face-to-face data collection, with higher levels of web penetration and digital literacy, zero interviewer effects, relative cost efficiency, as well as promising response rates and representativeness. Together these changes call into question whether the face-to-face method truly remains the ‘gold standard’ for surveys of the British population.This paper compares face-to-face data collection on the 10th round of the European Social Survey in Great Britain with an experimental self-completion survey (sequential web to paper) conducted at the same time, using the same questionnaire. The self-completion approach achieved a considerably higher response rate than the face-to-face survey, slightly better representativeness, a much shorter data collection period and substantially lower cost per interview. At the same time, it was found that the self-completion survey had slightly inferior data quality on some measures. The paper concludes that self-completion data collection offers a high-quality alternative to face-to-face data collection in Great Britain, potentially becoming the new ‘gold standard’ in the near future for surveys that can be conducted by web and paper modes in combination.
6
Survey Futures: Survey Data Collection Methods Collaboration
Fitzgerald, Rory
b2983148-e260-4f81-8aeb-3e34cc4936cb
Ndebele, Nhlanhla
4e386275-0e69-4463-a10e-977db26b5621
Maslovskaya, Olga
9c979052-e9d7-4400-a657-38f1f9cd74d0
Domarchi, Cristian
12770dd9-ec99-4d57-acfc-4ca745b63f07
Lynn, Peter
bd2d1d02-1a66-4454-bc04-175aec4886a0
Hanson, Tim
11b33321-2a69-443f-8430-7d4b5fbdbe41
Comanaru, Ruxandra
6b1f3414-fdb3-45f2-a692-0811d95ef880
Fitzgerald, Rory
b2983148-e260-4f81-8aeb-3e34cc4936cb
Ndebele, Nhlanhla
4e386275-0e69-4463-a10e-977db26b5621
Maslovskaya, Olga
9c979052-e9d7-4400-a657-38f1f9cd74d0
Domarchi, Cristian
12770dd9-ec99-4d57-acfc-4ca745b63f07
Lynn, Peter
bd2d1d02-1a66-4454-bc04-175aec4886a0
Hanson, Tim
11b33321-2a69-443f-8430-7d4b5fbdbe41
Comanaru, Ruxandra
6b1f3414-fdb3-45f2-a692-0811d95ef880

Fitzgerald, Rory, Ndebele, Nhlanhla, Maslovskaya, Olga, Domarchi, Cristian, Lynn, Peter, Hanson, Tim and Comanaru, Ruxandra (2025) Still the gold standard in survey research? Comparing face-to-face and self-completion data collection in a repeat cross-sectional general social survey in Great Britain (Working papers, 6) Survey Futures: Survey Data Collection Methods Collaboration 34pp.

Record type: Monograph (Working Paper)

Abstract

Surveys aim to provide estimates of the behaviour, social conditions, or attitudes for the population they seek to represent. Since modern surveys of the general population were first established, the best way to collect high quality data was felt to be via face-to-face interviews amongst probability samples of households or individuals. However, more recently, face-to-face data collection in Great Britain has been impacted by declining response rates, increasing evidence of interviewer effects, rising costs and a reduction in the number of providers. At the same time, self-completion surveys in Great Britain offer an increasingly convincing alternative to face-to-face data collection, with higher levels of web penetration and digital literacy, zero interviewer effects, relative cost efficiency, as well as promising response rates and representativeness. Together these changes call into question whether the face-to-face method truly remains the ‘gold standard’ for surveys of the British population.This paper compares face-to-face data collection on the 10th round of the European Social Survey in Great Britain with an experimental self-completion survey (sequential web to paper) conducted at the same time, using the same questionnaire. The self-completion approach achieved a considerably higher response rate than the face-to-face survey, slightly better representativeness, a much shorter data collection period and substantially lower cost per interview. At the same time, it was found that the self-completion survey had slightly inferior data quality on some measures. The paper concludes that self-completion data collection offers a high-quality alternative to face-to-face data collection in Great Britain, potentially becoming the new ‘gold standard’ in the near future for surveys that can be conducted by web and paper modes in combination.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: October 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507217
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507217
PURE UUID: 555e3585-2e9d-4421-986e-b127c05ac5de
ORCID for Olga Maslovskaya: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3814-810X
ORCID for Cristian Domarchi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9068-704X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Dec 2025 17:53
Last modified: 02 Dec 2025 03:10

Export record

Contributors

Author: Rory Fitzgerald
Author: Nhlanhla Ndebele
Author: Cristian Domarchi ORCID iD
Author: Peter Lynn
Author: Tim Hanson
Author: Ruxandra Comanaru

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×