Continuous glucose monitoring metrics and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a secondary analysis of the DiGest trial
Continuous glucose monitoring metrics and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a secondary analysis of the DiGest trial
OBJECTIVE: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly used in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but optimal metrics, ranges, and targets in this population are undefined. We assessed associations between CGM metrics and pregnancy outcomes in GDM.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: During the DiGest study, 425 women with GDM (diagnosed at median [IQR] 25.1 [18.3-27.7] weeks) and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 received a dietary intervention, with masked Dexcom G6 CGM at 29 (n = 361), 32 (n = 215), and 36 (n = 227) weeks' gestation. For this secondary analysis, we used logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves, and the Youden index to assess associations and predictive ability of CGM metrics, including pregnancy-specific time in range (TIRp) (63-140 mg/dL [3.5-7.8 mmol/L]) and pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS: CGM metrics at 29 weeks were significantly associated with large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA). Participants achieving mean glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L), TIRp ≥90%, or pregnancy-specific time above range (TARp) <10% at 29 weeks had a significantly lower risk of LGA (odds ratio [OR] 0.41 [95% CI 0.22, 0.77], 0.38 [0.20, 0.70], and 0.39 [0.20, 0.73], respectively) and SGA (0.26 [0.08, 0.79], 0.30 [0.10, 0.91], and 0.19 [0.06, 0.62], respectively). TARp <10% and mean nocturnal glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L) were associated with a reduced odds of preterm birth (OR 0.40 [0.17, 0.94] and 0.42 [0.19, 0.97], respectively). A stricter range (63-120 mg/dL [3.5-6.7 mmol/L]) had similar performance overall, but had no single statistically robust TIR/TAR target across all outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: In women with GDM, CGM mean glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L), ≥90% TIRp, or <10% TARp using a range of 63-140 mg/dL (3.5-7.8 mmol/L) at 29 weeks' gestation was associated with a low risk of suboptimal offspring outcomes.
Kusinski, Laura C
37ebebf1-b85b-4ed3-9730-5ad2fee840ea
Atta, Nooria
e870731b-bd2d-4842-95f7-27223e94548b
Jones, Danielle L
b5504131-6682-4182-99f2-3aa4171494e0
Oude Griep, Linda M
846b51b4-5a5e-4256-abbf-0a68e14b8219
Rennie, Kirsten L
68d6775c-d5d0-49bf-a981-46d80c8264eb
de Lucia Rolfe, Emanuella
658cc447-bdfc-429f-8cec-cb233a72f84d
Murphy, Helen R
48358e20-54dc-4e5b-aa0f-9645dcecadf3
Scott, Eleanor M
3fb3cba7-ecb4-4075-a1f5-0919bcfbe191
Sharp, Stephen J
65e1326f-97f8-4654-b75c-15d046f00532
Taylor, Roy
728418b3-9b0a-4756-8a52-9bb71745c6c4
Meek, Claire L
5fee5eba-aa22-4446-bffd-d3622c7b425d
19 August 2025
Kusinski, Laura C
37ebebf1-b85b-4ed3-9730-5ad2fee840ea
Atta, Nooria
e870731b-bd2d-4842-95f7-27223e94548b
Jones, Danielle L
b5504131-6682-4182-99f2-3aa4171494e0
Oude Griep, Linda M
846b51b4-5a5e-4256-abbf-0a68e14b8219
Rennie, Kirsten L
68d6775c-d5d0-49bf-a981-46d80c8264eb
de Lucia Rolfe, Emanuella
658cc447-bdfc-429f-8cec-cb233a72f84d
Murphy, Helen R
48358e20-54dc-4e5b-aa0f-9645dcecadf3
Scott, Eleanor M
3fb3cba7-ecb4-4075-a1f5-0919bcfbe191
Sharp, Stephen J
65e1326f-97f8-4654-b75c-15d046f00532
Taylor, Roy
728418b3-9b0a-4756-8a52-9bb71745c6c4
Meek, Claire L
5fee5eba-aa22-4446-bffd-d3622c7b425d
Kusinski, Laura C, Atta, Nooria, Jones, Danielle L, Oude Griep, Linda M, Rennie, Kirsten L, de Lucia Rolfe, Emanuella, Murphy, Helen R, Scott, Eleanor M, Sharp, Stephen J, Taylor, Roy and Meek, Claire L
(2025)
Continuous glucose monitoring metrics and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a secondary analysis of the DiGest trial.
Diabetes Care.
(doi:10.2337/dc25-0452).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly used in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but optimal metrics, ranges, and targets in this population are undefined. We assessed associations between CGM metrics and pregnancy outcomes in GDM.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: During the DiGest study, 425 women with GDM (diagnosed at median [IQR] 25.1 [18.3-27.7] weeks) and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 received a dietary intervention, with masked Dexcom G6 CGM at 29 (n = 361), 32 (n = 215), and 36 (n = 227) weeks' gestation. For this secondary analysis, we used logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves, and the Youden index to assess associations and predictive ability of CGM metrics, including pregnancy-specific time in range (TIRp) (63-140 mg/dL [3.5-7.8 mmol/L]) and pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS: CGM metrics at 29 weeks were significantly associated with large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA). Participants achieving mean glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L), TIRp ≥90%, or pregnancy-specific time above range (TARp) <10% at 29 weeks had a significantly lower risk of LGA (odds ratio [OR] 0.41 [95% CI 0.22, 0.77], 0.38 [0.20, 0.70], and 0.39 [0.20, 0.73], respectively) and SGA (0.26 [0.08, 0.79], 0.30 [0.10, 0.91], and 0.19 [0.06, 0.62], respectively). TARp <10% and mean nocturnal glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L) were associated with a reduced odds of preterm birth (OR 0.40 [0.17, 0.94] and 0.42 [0.19, 0.97], respectively). A stricter range (63-120 mg/dL [3.5-6.7 mmol/L]) had similar performance overall, but had no single statistically robust TIR/TAR target across all outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: In women with GDM, CGM mean glucose <110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L), ≥90% TIRp, or <10% TARp using a range of 63-140 mg/dL (3.5-7.8 mmol/L) at 29 weeks' gestation was associated with a low risk of suboptimal offspring outcomes.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 12 July 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 August 2025
Published date: 19 August 2025
Additional Information:
© 2025 by the American Diabetes Association.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 507252
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507252
ISSN: 1935-5548
PURE UUID: 3efff283-c754-4fa8-b70b-362eef95b41c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 02 Dec 2025 18:04
Last modified: 03 Dec 2025 03:12
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Laura C Kusinski
Author:
Nooria Atta
Author:
Danielle L Jones
Author:
Linda M Oude Griep
Author:
Kirsten L Rennie
Author:
Emanuella de Lucia Rolfe
Author:
Helen R Murphy
Author:
Eleanor M Scott
Author:
Stephen J Sharp
Author:
Roy Taylor
Author:
Claire L Meek
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics