The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sound symbolism facilitates interspecies communication between humans and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris)

Sound symbolism facilitates interspecies communication between humans and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris)
Sound symbolism facilitates interspecies communication between humans and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris)

The evolution of human communication likely centred, in part, on shared intuitions about the mapping of sound to meaning. These sound-meaning intuitions, known as sound symbolism, can be seen for example in the bouba-kiki effect, where nonsense words carry inherent meaning about their likely referents (here, rounded vs. angular objects respectively). In our paper we suggest for the first time that sound symbolism can afford successful interspecies communication between humans and animals in certain circumstances. Over four investigations, including replications, we show that humans use sound symbolism significantly and pervasively to attempt to convey meaning to domestic dogs (Canis familiaris), specifically, by exploiting vocal prosody to signal elevation in space. In Study 1 we analysed recordings of amateur dog owners commanding their dogs to move upwards (e.g., “stand”) or downwards (e.g., “down”), finding higher mean pitch (fundamental frequency, f 0) in the former versus the latter. In Studies 2 and 3a, we replicated this in competitive dog owners, both in self-report, and in acoustic voice-analyses recorded in competition. In addition, professionals also used further sound symbolism beyond amateurs, in their commands for the dog to “sit” (using higher pitch to denote sit up vs. sit down). Finally, in Study 3b, we demonstrate that sound symbolism appears to be mutually understood by dogs in certain useful circumstances. Dogs were faster to enact “down” commands with prosodic sound symbolism, compared to without, demonstrating that sound symbolism may sometimes underlie successful inter-species communication.

Animal communication, Cross-modality, Dog, Pitch, Prosody, Sound symbolism
2045-2322
Korzeniowska, A.T.
6419ff9e-543f-4e41-8d14-1f4b05e231af
Root-Gutteridge, H.
7e88de2a-8a1d-44a7-9438-4a3a48f11052
Reby, D.
3bf4c3ea-9eb0-4b1a-9fe8-bc7a5406387c
Simner, J.
bb2156da-4da1-4485-8583-4b456b262541
Korzeniowska, A.T.
6419ff9e-543f-4e41-8d14-1f4b05e231af
Root-Gutteridge, H.
7e88de2a-8a1d-44a7-9438-4a3a48f11052
Reby, D.
3bf4c3ea-9eb0-4b1a-9fe8-bc7a5406387c
Simner, J.
bb2156da-4da1-4485-8583-4b456b262541

Korzeniowska, A.T., Root-Gutteridge, H., Reby, D. and Simner, J. (2025) Sound symbolism facilitates interspecies communication between humans and domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Scientific Reports, 15 (1), [39476]. (doi:10.1038/s41598-025-22923-1).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The evolution of human communication likely centred, in part, on shared intuitions about the mapping of sound to meaning. These sound-meaning intuitions, known as sound symbolism, can be seen for example in the bouba-kiki effect, where nonsense words carry inherent meaning about their likely referents (here, rounded vs. angular objects respectively). In our paper we suggest for the first time that sound symbolism can afford successful interspecies communication between humans and animals in certain circumstances. Over four investigations, including replications, we show that humans use sound symbolism significantly and pervasively to attempt to convey meaning to domestic dogs (Canis familiaris), specifically, by exploiting vocal prosody to signal elevation in space. In Study 1 we analysed recordings of amateur dog owners commanding their dogs to move upwards (e.g., “stand”) or downwards (e.g., “down”), finding higher mean pitch (fundamental frequency, f 0) in the former versus the latter. In Studies 2 and 3a, we replicated this in competitive dog owners, both in self-report, and in acoustic voice-analyses recorded in competition. In addition, professionals also used further sound symbolism beyond amateurs, in their commands for the dog to “sit” (using higher pitch to denote sit up vs. sit down). Finally, in Study 3b, we demonstrate that sound symbolism appears to be mutually understood by dogs in certain useful circumstances. Dogs were faster to enact “down” commands with prosodic sound symbolism, compared to without, demonstrating that sound symbolism may sometimes underlie successful inter-species communication.

Text
s41598-025-22923-1 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: 11 November 2025
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2025.
Keywords: Animal communication, Cross-modality, Dog, Pitch, Prosody, Sound symbolism

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507460
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507460
ISSN: 2045-2322
PURE UUID: 0aaec96e-6fe4-4adf-b214-f58befd2aece
ORCID for A.T. Korzeniowska: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5518-6349

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Dec 2025 17:54
Last modified: 12 Dec 2025 03:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A.T. Korzeniowska ORCID iD
Author: H. Root-Gutteridge
Author: D. Reby
Author: J. Simner

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×