The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Strength of evidence for paternal influence on offspring epigenome in observational human studies: a systematic review and risk-of-bias appraisals for non-randomized exposures

Strength of evidence for paternal influence on offspring epigenome in observational human studies: a systematic review and risk-of-bias appraisals for non-randomized exposures
Strength of evidence for paternal influence on offspring epigenome in observational human studies: a systematic review and risk-of-bias appraisals for non-randomized exposures
Paternal influence on the offspring epigenome is difficult to interpret in observational human studies due to heterogeneous designs, causing varying susceptibility to bias and non-causal explanations. We conducted a systematic review (CRD42022302695) of paternal exposures before or during pregnancy in relation to the offspring epigenome, focusing on characteristics affecting causal interpretation and reproducibility. We searched three electronic databases for human studies published between 2003 and 2023. Eligible studies assessed paternal factors before or during pregnancy as exposures, and epigenetic mechanisms as outcomes. Risk of bias (RoB) was evaluated using ROBINS-E. The most frequently studied paternal factors were BMI/obesity (7), age (7), smoking (5), and socioeconomic status (SES) (4). All 28 studies assessed DNA methylation; two additionally explored miRNA expression. Most studies were rated ‘high’ or ‘very high’ RoB, primarily due to unclear exposure measurement and confounding. Findings showed limited overlap in CpG sites and genomic regions across studies. However, exposures that were stable (e.g. SES) or had clearly defined timing produced more consistent results. Notably, studies with clearly defined timing of paternal smoking suggested preconception exposure may influence offspring epigenetic pathways related to innate immunity but not pregnancy exposure. In contrast, paternal factors with poorly defined experimental analogues, such as BMI, provided inconsistent results. Aligning study design more closely with clinical trials or animal models, by clearly defining populations and exposures, may result in more reliable and replicable findings. Frameworks like ‘target trial emulation,’ offer a promising approach to improve reproducibility and interpretability of future research on paternal effects on offspring epigenome.
Epigenetics, causal inference, molecular epidemiology, paternal effects
1559-2294
2594322
Sum, Ka Kei
e67ccf7e-5e53-46e0-a948-35d875f7d8e3
Burton, Mark A.
250319ad-90dc-4651-b118-d5dbe5eaafa6
Garcia-, Cristina
a74b61ef-9de1-49d0-87aa-a669d239699d
Teh, Ai Ling
af437ef4-60d8-4b1f-9c3c-54ab35a1ac23
Godfrey, Keith M.
0931701e-fe2c-44b5-8f0d-ec5c7477a6fd
Huang, Jonathan Yinhao
b781914f-c08e-4281-96cb-58109239bd34
Sum, Ka Kei
e67ccf7e-5e53-46e0-a948-35d875f7d8e3
Burton, Mark A.
250319ad-90dc-4651-b118-d5dbe5eaafa6
Garcia-, Cristina
a74b61ef-9de1-49d0-87aa-a669d239699d
Teh, Ai Ling
af437ef4-60d8-4b1f-9c3c-54ab35a1ac23
Godfrey, Keith M.
0931701e-fe2c-44b5-8f0d-ec5c7477a6fd
Huang, Jonathan Yinhao
b781914f-c08e-4281-96cb-58109239bd34

Sum, Ka Kei, Burton, Mark A., Garcia-, Cristina, Teh, Ai Ling, Godfrey, Keith M. and Huang, Jonathan Yinhao (2025) Strength of evidence for paternal influence on offspring epigenome in observational human studies: a systematic review and risk-of-bias appraisals for non-randomized exposures. Epigenetics, 20 (1), 2594322. (doi:10.1080/15592294.2025.2594322).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Paternal influence on the offspring epigenome is difficult to interpret in observational human studies due to heterogeneous designs, causing varying susceptibility to bias and non-causal explanations. We conducted a systematic review (CRD42022302695) of paternal exposures before or during pregnancy in relation to the offspring epigenome, focusing on characteristics affecting causal interpretation and reproducibility. We searched three electronic databases for human studies published between 2003 and 2023. Eligible studies assessed paternal factors before or during pregnancy as exposures, and epigenetic mechanisms as outcomes. Risk of bias (RoB) was evaluated using ROBINS-E. The most frequently studied paternal factors were BMI/obesity (7), age (7), smoking (5), and socioeconomic status (SES) (4). All 28 studies assessed DNA methylation; two additionally explored miRNA expression. Most studies were rated ‘high’ or ‘very high’ RoB, primarily due to unclear exposure measurement and confounding. Findings showed limited overlap in CpG sites and genomic regions across studies. However, exposures that were stable (e.g. SES) or had clearly defined timing produced more consistent results. Notably, studies with clearly defined timing of paternal smoking suggested preconception exposure may influence offspring epigenetic pathways related to innate immunity but not pregnancy exposure. In contrast, paternal factors with poorly defined experimental analogues, such as BMI, provided inconsistent results. Aligning study design more closely with clinical trials or animal models, by clearly defining populations and exposures, may result in more reliable and replicable findings. Frameworks like ‘target trial emulation,’ offer a promising approach to improve reproducibility and interpretability of future research on paternal effects on offspring epigenome.

Text
Paternal_contributions_to_offspring_epigenome_20251104_epigenetics_clean - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)
Text
Strength of evidence for paternal influence on offspring epigenome in observational human studies a systematic review and risk-of-bias appraisal for - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 19 November 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 December 2025
Keywords: Epigenetics, causal inference, molecular epidemiology, paternal effects

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507690
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507690
ISSN: 1559-2294
PURE UUID: 13edbc1b-2f0b-4713-b88a-bd2b0e902b0d
ORCID for Mark A. Burton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7117-8151
ORCID for Keith M. Godfrey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4643-0618

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Dec 2025 17:40
Last modified: 20 Dec 2025 03:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ka Kei Sum
Author: Mark A. Burton ORCID iD
Author: Cristina Garcia-
Author: Ai Ling Teh
Author: Jonathan Yinhao Huang

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×