The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Do SEP injunctions alter market shares? Causal evidence from the Nokia–OPPO dispute in Europe

Do SEP injunctions alter market shares? Causal evidence from the Nokia–OPPO dispute in Europe
Do SEP injunctions alter market shares? Causal evidence from the Nokia–OPPO dispute in Europe
This study examines whether standard essential patent (SEP) injunctions reshape the European smartphone market structure. Using the 2022Q3 German injunction against OPPO as a natural experiment, we construct a brand × country × quarter panel across five major European markets (2021–2024). Employing a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) model with brand × country and quarter fixed effects, complemented by event study approach, we identify the injunction’s impact on market share. According to the results, the patent litigation leads to a significant decline in the market share of the treatment group, which confirms the negative impact of SEP litigation on the market performance of the vendors. The conclusions remain robust to the replacement of the explanatory variable, different event windows, placebo periods, and wild-cluster bootstrap inference.
Europe, SEP, difference-in-differences, injunctions, smartphones
1350-4851
1-6
Deng, Liang
c837ff68-feea-4f08-a52e-fb6dabc9eded
Deng, Liang
c837ff68-feea-4f08-a52e-fb6dabc9eded

Deng, Liang (2025) Do SEP injunctions alter market shares? Causal evidence from the Nokia–OPPO dispute in Europe. Applied Economics Letters, 1-6. (doi:10.1080/13504851.2025.2604636).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This study examines whether standard essential patent (SEP) injunctions reshape the European smartphone market structure. Using the 2022Q3 German injunction against OPPO as a natural experiment, we construct a brand × country × quarter panel across five major European markets (2021–2024). Employing a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) model with brand × country and quarter fixed effects, complemented by event study approach, we identify the injunction’s impact on market share. According to the results, the patent litigation leads to a significant decline in the market share of the treatment group, which confirms the negative impact of SEP litigation on the market performance of the vendors. The conclusions remain robust to the replacement of the explanatory variable, different event windows, placebo periods, and wild-cluster bootstrap inference.

Text
Do SEP injunctions alter market shares Causal evidence from the Nokia OPPO dispute in Europe TF - Proof
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (909kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 December 2025
Published date: 17 December 2025
Keywords: Europe, SEP, difference-in-differences, injunctions, smartphones

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507703
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507703
ISSN: 1350-4851
PURE UUID: fb5fcfcb-2715-46ba-8bd9-972a00c10600

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Dec 2025 17:50
Last modified: 07 Jan 2026 15:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Liang Deng

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×