The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Protecting financial consumers from authorized push payment fraud: is reimbursement an optimal solution?

Protecting financial consumers from authorized push payment fraud: is reimbursement an optimal solution?
Protecting financial consumers from authorized push payment fraud: is reimbursement an optimal solution?
Purpose: this paper aims to explore the potential implications of the UK’s new mandatory reimbursement scheme as a protective measure for financial consumers against the increasing threat of authorized push payment (APP) fraud.

Design/methodology/approach: this study adopts a literature-based methodology to evaluate the UK’s new reimbursement scheme. It draws on both primary and secondary sources, including legislation, case law, regulatory documents and academic articles, aiming to provide a nuanced understanding of the extent to which the mandatory reimbursement scheme addresses the challenges posed by evolving APP fraud tactics in consumer protection.

Findings: this study finds that mandatory reimbursement reinforces the gatekeeping role of payment service providers (PSPs). While it helps mitigate the immediate financial losses experienced by victims, it may inadvertently discourage consumers from taking precautions to protect themselves against APP fraud, thereby limiting its effectiveness in overall fraud prevention. The study suggests considering an alternative approach that proportionally distributes responsibility. In addition, the study examines the scheme as an insurance mechanism, suggesting that if PSPs shift increased costs to consumers as an indirect premium charge, reimbursement may not significantly impact PSPs’ behavior. However, the lack of transparency in these charges raises fairness concerns for consumers. Nonetheless, insights from fraud management in the insurance sector offer valuable guidance for PSPs in refining anti-fraud strategies, particularly through artificial intelligence-driven technologies.

Originality/value: the value of this study lies in its forward-thinking approach, offering critical insights into the new scheme as a form of redress for APP victims.
APP fraud, Consumer protection, Financial regulation, Fraud prevention, Gatekeeper liability
1358-1988
642-653
Yang, Chen
ded66e13-6ea9-4705-8fa0-4d42d54cc07d
Yang, Chen
ded66e13-6ea9-4705-8fa0-4d42d54cc07d

Yang, Chen (2025) Protecting financial consumers from authorized push payment fraud: is reimbursement an optimal solution? Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 33 (4), 642-653. (doi:10.1108/JFRC-11-2024-0225).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: this paper aims to explore the potential implications of the UK’s new mandatory reimbursement scheme as a protective measure for financial consumers against the increasing threat of authorized push payment (APP) fraud.

Design/methodology/approach: this study adopts a literature-based methodology to evaluate the UK’s new reimbursement scheme. It draws on both primary and secondary sources, including legislation, case law, regulatory documents and academic articles, aiming to provide a nuanced understanding of the extent to which the mandatory reimbursement scheme addresses the challenges posed by evolving APP fraud tactics in consumer protection.

Findings: this study finds that mandatory reimbursement reinforces the gatekeeping role of payment service providers (PSPs). While it helps mitigate the immediate financial losses experienced by victims, it may inadvertently discourage consumers from taking precautions to protect themselves against APP fraud, thereby limiting its effectiveness in overall fraud prevention. The study suggests considering an alternative approach that proportionally distributes responsibility. In addition, the study examines the scheme as an insurance mechanism, suggesting that if PSPs shift increased costs to consumers as an indirect premium charge, reimbursement may not significantly impact PSPs’ behavior. However, the lack of transparency in these charges raises fairness concerns for consumers. Nonetheless, insights from fraud management in the insurance sector offer valuable guidance for PSPs in refining anti-fraud strategies, particularly through artificial intelligence-driven technologies.

Originality/value: the value of this study lies in its forward-thinking approach, offering critical insights into the new scheme as a form of redress for APP victims.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 18 March 2025
Published date: 15 April 2025
Keywords: APP fraud, Consumer protection, Financial regulation, Fraud prevention, Gatekeeper liability

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507754
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507754
ISSN: 1358-1988
PURE UUID: 1ebb6cb3-3674-4374-a2ea-94cbf6398f05
ORCID for Chen Yang: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0002-5037-293X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jan 2026 11:06
Last modified: 07 Jan 2026 03:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Chen Yang ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×