The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Digitalizing a brief intervention to reduce intrusive memories of psychological trauma: qualitative interview study

Digitalizing a brief intervention to reduce intrusive memories of psychological trauma: qualitative interview study
Digitalizing a brief intervention to reduce intrusive memories of psychological trauma: qualitative interview study
Background: the COVID-19 pandemic has escalated the global need for remotely delivered and scalable interventions after psychological trauma. A brief intervention involving a computer game as an imagery-competing task has shown promising results for reducing the number of intrusive memories of trauma—one of the core clinical symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. To date, the intervention has only been delivered face-to-face. To be tested and implemented on a wider scale, digital adaptation for remote delivery is crucial. An important first step is to develop digitalized intervention materials in a systematic way based on feedback from clinicians, researchers, and students in preparation for pilot testing with target users.

Objective: the first aim of this study is to obtain and analyze qualitative feedback on digital intervention materials, namely two animated videos and two quizzes that explain the target clinical symptoms and provide intervention instructions. The second aim is to refine the digitalized materials based on this feedback.

Methods: we conducted semistructured interviews with 12 participants who had delivered or had knowledge of the intervention when delivered face-to-face. We obtained in-depth feedback on the perceived feasibility of using the digitalized materials and suggestions for improvements. Interviews were assessed using qualitative content analysis, and suggested improvements were evaluated for implementation using a systematic method of prioritization.

Results: a total of three overarching themes were identified from the data. First, participants were highly positive about the potential benefits of using these digital materials for remote delivery, reporting that the videos effectively conveyed key concepts of the symptom and its treatment. Second, some modifications to the materials were suggested for improving clarity. On the basis of this feedback, we made nine specific changes. Finally, participants raised some key challenges for remote delivery, mainly in overcoming the lack of real-time communication during the intervention.

Conclusions: clinicians, researchers, and clinical psychology students were overall confident in the use of digitalized materials to remotely deliver a brief intervention to reduce intrusive memories of trauma. Guided by participant feedback, we identified and implemented changes to refine the intervention materials. This study lays the groundwork for the next step: pilot testing remote delivery of the full intervention to trauma survivors.
2368-7959
Gamble, Beau
47f6602e-1f83-423d-99d8-55903c080ac8
Depa, Katherine
4d6f7612-f1ad-4cd8-9817-aafe8d5671b3
Holmes, Emily A
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469
Kanstrup, Marie
5ca5fe0c-402a-425c-bf8e-40d3b79b900d
Gamble, Beau
47f6602e-1f83-423d-99d8-55903c080ac8
Depa, Katherine
4d6f7612-f1ad-4cd8-9817-aafe8d5671b3
Holmes, Emily A
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469
Kanstrup, Marie
5ca5fe0c-402a-425c-bf8e-40d3b79b900d

Gamble, Beau, Depa, Katherine, Holmes, Emily A and Kanstrup, Marie (2021) Digitalizing a brief intervention to reduce intrusive memories of psychological trauma: qualitative interview study. JMIR Mental Health, 8 (2). (doi:10.2196/23712).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the COVID-19 pandemic has escalated the global need for remotely delivered and scalable interventions after psychological trauma. A brief intervention involving a computer game as an imagery-competing task has shown promising results for reducing the number of intrusive memories of trauma—one of the core clinical symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. To date, the intervention has only been delivered face-to-face. To be tested and implemented on a wider scale, digital adaptation for remote delivery is crucial. An important first step is to develop digitalized intervention materials in a systematic way based on feedback from clinicians, researchers, and students in preparation for pilot testing with target users.

Objective: the first aim of this study is to obtain and analyze qualitative feedback on digital intervention materials, namely two animated videos and two quizzes that explain the target clinical symptoms and provide intervention instructions. The second aim is to refine the digitalized materials based on this feedback.

Methods: we conducted semistructured interviews with 12 participants who had delivered or had knowledge of the intervention when delivered face-to-face. We obtained in-depth feedback on the perceived feasibility of using the digitalized materials and suggestions for improvements. Interviews were assessed using qualitative content analysis, and suggested improvements were evaluated for implementation using a systematic method of prioritization.

Results: a total of three overarching themes were identified from the data. First, participants were highly positive about the potential benefits of using these digital materials for remote delivery, reporting that the videos effectively conveyed key concepts of the symptom and its treatment. Second, some modifications to the materials were suggested for improving clarity. On the basis of this feedback, we made nine specific changes. Finally, participants raised some key challenges for remote delivery, mainly in overcoming the lack of real-time communication during the intervention.

Conclusions: clinicians, researchers, and clinical psychology students were overall confident in the use of digitalized materials to remotely deliver a brief intervention to reduce intrusive memories of trauma. Guided by participant feedback, we identified and implemented changes to refine the intervention materials. This study lays the groundwork for the next step: pilot testing remote delivery of the full intervention to trauma survivors.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 22 February 2021
Published date: 22 February 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507815
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507815
ISSN: 2368-7959
PURE UUID: f71a5b7e-cac1-4cc8-bcca-dc27ed1b478c
ORCID for Emily A Holmes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-3112

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jan 2026 17:54
Last modified: 08 Jan 2026 03:28

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Beau Gamble
Author: Katherine Depa
Author: Emily A Holmes ORCID iD
Author: Marie Kanstrup

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×