The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Internet-based attention bias modification for social anxiety: A Rrandomised controlled comparison of training towards negative and training towards positive cues

Internet-based attention bias modification for social anxiety: A Rrandomised controlled comparison of training towards negative and training towards positive cues
Internet-based attention bias modification for social anxiety: A Rrandomised controlled comparison of training towards negative and training towards positive cues
Biases in attention processes are thought to play a crucial role in the aetiology and maintenance of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). The goal of the present study was to examine the efficacy of a programme intended to train attention towards positive cues and a programme intended to train attention towards negative cues. In a randomised, controlled, double-blind design, the impact of these two training conditions on both selective attention and social anxiety were compared to that of a control training condition. A modified dot probe task was used, and delivered via the internet. A total of 129 individuals, diagnosed with SAD, were randomly assigned to one of these three conditions and took part in a 14-day programme with daily training/control sessions. Participants in all three groups did not on average display an attentional bias prior to the training. Critically, results on change in attention bias implied that significantly differential change in selective attention to threat was not detected in the three conditions. However, symptoms of social anxiety reduced significantly from pre- to follow-up-assessment in all three conditions (dwithin  = 0.63–1.24), with the procedure intended to train attention towards threat cues producing, relative to the control condition, a significantly greater reduction of social fears. There were no significant differences in social anxiety outcome between the training condition intended to induce attentional bias towards positive cues and the control condition. To our knowledge, this is the first RCT where a condition intended to induce attention bias to negative cues yielded greater emotional benefits than a control condition. Intriguingly, changes in symptoms are unlikely to be by the mechanism of change in attention processes since there was no change detected in bias per se. Implications of this finding for future research on attention bias modification in social anxiety are discussed.
1932-6203
Boettcher, J.
0d0605c0-a511-4721-becd-80a8d1e8deb5
Leek, L.
6a0c4dfd-1547-49a6-b95a-d35fcb87fe0f
Matson, L.
1ffd0c78-3fd9-4759-a421-62443ac1f847
Holmes, E.A.
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469
Browning, M.
5e31922b-2a63-45e4-82f4-ea64d4efb720
MacLeod, C.
13efff1d-97c5-424f-828a-66a9687ff6a2
Andersson, G.
fa7db26e-e25c-430a-9589-fc5276723327
Carlbring, P.
d0089081-02ca-4224-86f6-326fa0fc16eb
Boettcher, J.
0d0605c0-a511-4721-becd-80a8d1e8deb5
Leek, L.
6a0c4dfd-1547-49a6-b95a-d35fcb87fe0f
Matson, L.
1ffd0c78-3fd9-4759-a421-62443ac1f847
Holmes, E.A.
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469
Browning, M.
5e31922b-2a63-45e4-82f4-ea64d4efb720
MacLeod, C.
13efff1d-97c5-424f-828a-66a9687ff6a2
Andersson, G.
fa7db26e-e25c-430a-9589-fc5276723327
Carlbring, P.
d0089081-02ca-4224-86f6-326fa0fc16eb

Boettcher, J., Leek, L., Matson, L., Holmes, E.A., Browning, M., MacLeod, C., Andersson, G. and Carlbring, P. (2013) Internet-based attention bias modification for social anxiety: A Rrandomised controlled comparison of training towards negative and training towards positive cues. PLoS ONE, 8 (9). (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071760).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Biases in attention processes are thought to play a crucial role in the aetiology and maintenance of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). The goal of the present study was to examine the efficacy of a programme intended to train attention towards positive cues and a programme intended to train attention towards negative cues. In a randomised, controlled, double-blind design, the impact of these two training conditions on both selective attention and social anxiety were compared to that of a control training condition. A modified dot probe task was used, and delivered via the internet. A total of 129 individuals, diagnosed with SAD, were randomly assigned to one of these three conditions and took part in a 14-day programme with daily training/control sessions. Participants in all three groups did not on average display an attentional bias prior to the training. Critically, results on change in attention bias implied that significantly differential change in selective attention to threat was not detected in the three conditions. However, symptoms of social anxiety reduced significantly from pre- to follow-up-assessment in all three conditions (dwithin  = 0.63–1.24), with the procedure intended to train attention towards threat cues producing, relative to the control condition, a significantly greater reduction of social fears. There were no significant differences in social anxiety outcome between the training condition intended to induce attentional bias towards positive cues and the control condition. To our knowledge, this is the first RCT where a condition intended to induce attention bias to negative cues yielded greater emotional benefits than a control condition. Intriguingly, changes in symptoms are unlikely to be by the mechanism of change in attention processes since there was no change detected in bias per se. Implications of this finding for future research on attention bias modification in social anxiety are discussed.

Text
file (3) - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (531kB)

More information

Published date: 30 September 2013

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507911
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507911
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 7a844b31-ff9d-4f41-83f6-a345c1427b2a
ORCID for E.A. Holmes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-3112

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jan 2026 17:51
Last modified: 08 Jan 2026 03:28

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J. Boettcher
Author: L. Leek
Author: L. Matson
Author: E.A. Holmes ORCID iD
Author: M. Browning
Author: C. MacLeod
Author: G. Andersson
Author: P. Carlbring

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×