The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Imagery Rescripting: The impact of conceptual and perceptual changes on aversive autobiographical memories

Imagery Rescripting: The impact of conceptual and perceptual changes on aversive autobiographical memories
Imagery Rescripting: The impact of conceptual and perceptual changes on aversive autobiographical memories
Background
Imagery rescripting (ImRs) is a process by which aversive autobiographical memories are rendered less unpleasant or emotional. ImRs is thought only to be effective if a change in the meaning-relevant (semantic) content of the mental image is produced, according to a cognitive hypothesis of ImRs. We propose an additional hypothesis: that ImRs can also be effective by the manipulation of perceptual features of the memory, without explicitly targeting meaning-relevant content.

Methods
In two experiments using a within-subjects design (both N = 48, community samples), both Conceptual-ImRs—focusing on changing meaning-relevant content—and Perceptual-ImRs—focusing on changing perceptual features—were compared to Recall-only of aversive autobiographical image-based memories. An active control condition, Recall + Attentional Breathing (Recall+AB) was added in the first experiment. In the second experiment, a Positive-ImRs condition was added—changing the aversive image into a positive image that was unrelated to the aversive autobiographical memory. Effects on the aversive memory’s unpleasantness, vividness and emotionality were investigated.

Results
In Experiment 1, compared to Recall-only, both Conceptual-ImRs and Perceptual-ImRs led to greater decreases in unpleasantness, and Perceptual-ImRs led to greater decreases in emotionality of memories. In Experiment 2, the effects on unpleasantness were not replicated, and both Conceptual-ImRs and Perceptual-ImRs led to greater decreases in emotionality, compared to Recall-only, as did Positive-ImRs. There were no effects on vividness, and the ImRs conditions did not differ significantly from Recall+AB.

Conclusions
Results suggest that, in addition to traditional forms of ImRs, targeting the meaning-relevant content of an image during ImRs, relatively simple techniques focusing on perceptual aspects or positive imagery might also yield benefits. Findings require replication and extension to clinical samples.
1932-6203
Slofstra, C.
ad699b7e-1b74-48da-9854-a51116eca3b5
Nauta, M.H.
06e7e963-941a-4493-b607-3975f67cdfad
Holmes, E.A.
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469
Bockting, C.L.H.
aa15aaa8-a3ab-4143-b91c-9ff557858d1a
Slofstra, C.
ad699b7e-1b74-48da-9854-a51116eca3b5
Nauta, M.H.
06e7e963-941a-4493-b607-3975f67cdfad
Holmes, E.A.
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469
Bockting, C.L.H.
aa15aaa8-a3ab-4143-b91c-9ff557858d1a

Slofstra, C., Nauta, M.H., Holmes, E.A. and Bockting, C.L.H. (2016) Imagery Rescripting: The impact of conceptual and perceptual changes on aversive autobiographical memories. PLoS ONE. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160235).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Imagery rescripting (ImRs) is a process by which aversive autobiographical memories are rendered less unpleasant or emotional. ImRs is thought only to be effective if a change in the meaning-relevant (semantic) content of the mental image is produced, according to a cognitive hypothesis of ImRs. We propose an additional hypothesis: that ImRs can also be effective by the manipulation of perceptual features of the memory, without explicitly targeting meaning-relevant content.

Methods
In two experiments using a within-subjects design (both N = 48, community samples), both Conceptual-ImRs—focusing on changing meaning-relevant content—and Perceptual-ImRs—focusing on changing perceptual features—were compared to Recall-only of aversive autobiographical image-based memories. An active control condition, Recall + Attentional Breathing (Recall+AB) was added in the first experiment. In the second experiment, a Positive-ImRs condition was added—changing the aversive image into a positive image that was unrelated to the aversive autobiographical memory. Effects on the aversive memory’s unpleasantness, vividness and emotionality were investigated.

Results
In Experiment 1, compared to Recall-only, both Conceptual-ImRs and Perceptual-ImRs led to greater decreases in unpleasantness, and Perceptual-ImRs led to greater decreases in emotionality of memories. In Experiment 2, the effects on unpleasantness were not replicated, and both Conceptual-ImRs and Perceptual-ImRs led to greater decreases in emotionality, compared to Recall-only, as did Positive-ImRs. There were no effects on vividness, and the ImRs conditions did not differ significantly from Recall+AB.

Conclusions
Results suggest that, in addition to traditional forms of ImRs, targeting the meaning-relevant content of an image during ImRs, relatively simple techniques focusing on perceptual aspects or positive imagery might also yield benefits. Findings require replication and extension to clinical samples.

Text
file (2) - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (288kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 July 2016
Published date: 3 August 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507915
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507915
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 2712a228-4ae0-439b-b46c-69ad5bfc5c4f
ORCID for E.A. Holmes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-3112

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jan 2026 17:54
Last modified: 08 Jan 2026 03:28

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: C. Slofstra
Author: M.H. Nauta
Author: E.A. Holmes ORCID iD
Author: C.L.H. Bockting

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×