The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Ultrasonic tool to cut human bone: cutting speed and forces necessary for potential remote robotic arms

Ultrasonic tool to cut human bone: cutting speed and forces necessary for potential remote robotic arms
Ultrasonic tool to cut human bone: cutting speed and forces necessary for potential remote robotic arms

Procedural-related musculoskeletal pain is common among orthopaedic surgeons, often caused by the repetitive use of high-force bone-cutting tools. Ultrasonic cutting devices, which can operate with lower force, may help reduce this physical burden. In this study, three practising orthopaedic surgeons each performed two cuts on three fresh cortical bone samples, harvested from excised femoral necks from three patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. The study was conducted using an ultrasonic cutting device in a controlled yet clinically reflective environment. A novel setup captured real-time data on surgeon-related parameters, including vertical cutting force and vertical and horizontal cutting speed. Consistent with previous research, we confirmed that ultrasonic devices enable low force cutting (average 1.91 N). However, our findings revealed significant variability in how each surgeon interacted with the device - including how much force each surgeon applied, and how the device was manoeuvred which can influence device performance, thermal effects, and overall clinical outcomes. Given the critical importance of surgeon-related factors, our results highlight the need to understand how each surgeon interacts with these devices differently. This insight can inform training and device optimisation strategies; help translate bench testing results into effective clinical use and ultimately improve surgical performance and patient outcomes. Additionally, our findings support the potential benefits of integrating ultrasonic devices with robotic platforms to maintain consistent cutting parameters. Future research should investigate optimal cutting parameters, evaluate different blade profiles, assess result generalisability and compare outcomes before and after training or system enhancements.

0954-4119
Yang, Irene
f5da149e-cd9e-48f4-bad4-27483fedb7a4
Buchanan, Russell
51a00cc5-9637-4ce2-9326-24a6473aa941
Al-Namnam, Nisreen
96e63146-a197-420a-b7db-ede4488333c7
Li, Xuan
de28eeac-cc76-4297-9897-3110b74971b0
Lucas, Margaret
8f1502b9-ffaa-4cb6-b78c-a1b58e1d31b2
Simpson, A. Hamish R.W.
c10e719c-7226-4b2d-b8b2-d4ae0dbd0926
Yang, Irene
f5da149e-cd9e-48f4-bad4-27483fedb7a4
Buchanan, Russell
51a00cc5-9637-4ce2-9326-24a6473aa941
Al-Namnam, Nisreen
96e63146-a197-420a-b7db-ede4488333c7
Li, Xuan
de28eeac-cc76-4297-9897-3110b74971b0
Lucas, Margaret
8f1502b9-ffaa-4cb6-b78c-a1b58e1d31b2
Simpson, A. Hamish R.W.
c10e719c-7226-4b2d-b8b2-d4ae0dbd0926

Yang, Irene, Buchanan, Russell, Al-Namnam, Nisreen, Li, Xuan, Lucas, Margaret and Simpson, A. Hamish R.W. (2025) Ultrasonic tool to cut human bone: cutting speed and forces necessary for potential remote robotic arms. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine. (doi:10.1177/09544119251399865).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Procedural-related musculoskeletal pain is common among orthopaedic surgeons, often caused by the repetitive use of high-force bone-cutting tools. Ultrasonic cutting devices, which can operate with lower force, may help reduce this physical burden. In this study, three practising orthopaedic surgeons each performed two cuts on three fresh cortical bone samples, harvested from excised femoral necks from three patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. The study was conducted using an ultrasonic cutting device in a controlled yet clinically reflective environment. A novel setup captured real-time data on surgeon-related parameters, including vertical cutting force and vertical and horizontal cutting speed. Consistent with previous research, we confirmed that ultrasonic devices enable low force cutting (average 1.91 N). However, our findings revealed significant variability in how each surgeon interacted with the device - including how much force each surgeon applied, and how the device was manoeuvred which can influence device performance, thermal effects, and overall clinical outcomes. Given the critical importance of surgeon-related factors, our results highlight the need to understand how each surgeon interacts with these devices differently. This insight can inform training and device optimisation strategies; help translate bench testing results into effective clinical use and ultimately improve surgical performance and patient outcomes. Additionally, our findings support the potential benefits of integrating ultrasonic devices with robotic platforms to maintain consistent cutting parameters. Future research should investigate optimal cutting parameters, evaluate different blade profiles, assess result generalisability and compare outcomes before and after training or system enhancements.

Text
yang-et-al-2025-ultrasonic-tool-to-cut-human-bone-cutting-speed-and-forces-necessary-for-potential-remote-robotic-arms - Version of Record
Download (3MB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 25 December 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507955
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507955
ISSN: 0954-4119
PURE UUID: ca82bd16-0de7-4e4a-9cb6-0ecad6bd68ad

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jan 2026 17:38
Last modified: 08 Jan 2026 17:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Irene Yang
Author: Russell Buchanan
Author: Nisreen Al-Namnam
Author: Xuan Li
Author: Margaret Lucas
Author: A. Hamish R.W. Simpson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×