The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

PREVENTion and treatment of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis (IAD) through optimising care: development and feasibility cluster randomised trial of the IAD-Manual (PREVENT-IAD)

PREVENTion and treatment of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis (IAD) through optimising care: development and feasibility cluster randomised trial of the IAD-Manual (PREVENT-IAD)
PREVENTion and treatment of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis (IAD) through optimising care: development and feasibility cluster randomised trial of the IAD-Manual (PREVENT-IAD)

Background: incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) is prevalent in long-term care (LTC) facilities and homecare settings amongst adults who are incontinent of urine and/or faeces. Strategies to protect skin integrity are needed. This study aimed to co-design and test the feasibility of a training manual and care guidance (IAD-Manual) to prevent and treat IAD in LTC facilities and homecare settings.

Methods: this was a three-phase study: (1) developing the intervention, (2) designing the empirical study (a cluster RCT with an embedded process evaluation) to assess its effectiveness (not reported here) and (3) a 3-month feasibility study. The feasibility study recruited three LTC facilities and two homecare providers, randomising them (each as a cluster) to intervention or control. Process evaluation interviews with two care recipients, 11 family carers and 13 care staff implementing the IAD-Manual and their managers were conducted. Observations of 22 episodes of care assessed fidelity to the intervention. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. Summary feasibility outcome measures using means or proportions together with 95% confidence intervals were reported.

Results: five sites were recruited from 49 approached. All randomised sites were retained. Seventy-six (16% [95% CI: 13-20%]) of the 477 participants approached were randomised, of which 58 (76% [95% CI: 65-85%]) completed the study. Candidate IAD outcomes had complete or almost-complete 3-month outcome data in those participants remaining, whereas other outcome measures had contrastingly poor data completeness largely due to participant cognitive impairment. Process evaluation showed few potential participants had the capacity to consent, and gaining consultee approval was challenging. Care staff at study sites liked the IAD-Manual, describing it as 'helpful'. Twenty-eight people accessed the IAD-Manual online, and 15 care staff downloaded a certificate of completion of training. Intervention fidelity was not always observed.

Conclusions: it was feasible to develop the IAD-Manual. The RCT as designed was not feasible in its original form, with specific challenges regarding site and participant recruitment, governance and intervention fidelity.

Trial registration: this trial was prospectively registered on 07/02/2020 (intervention development) ISRCTN26169429 and 28/02/2024 (feasibility study) ISRCTN70866724.

Co-design, Feasibility cluster RCT, Incontinence-associated dermatitis, Intervention development, Long-term care (LTC), Prevention, Social care, Training manual, Treatment
2055-5784
Woodward, Sue
fcf00367-04c2-4e26-adee-c86d30f96035
Graham, Tanya
8d1f961d-d8d9-48cb-83f3-ddeb8cf1746d
Beckley-Hoelscher, Nicholas
3cc5b860-eb85-4538-be6d-52fa2e0e4c9d
Beeckman, Dimitri
1ead183b-0e82-4b3f-864b-8dfc2e58de3e
Chatterton, Christopher
af7d3ec9-bc58-4efe-a2ed-229b73913469
Fader, Mandy
c318f942-2ddb-462a-9183-8b678faf7277
Fitzpatrick, Joanne M.
b356ea3e-95de-49dc-96c0-45fbabd51d03
Harris, Ruth
1e848808-be89-4f63-a62b-41ec65b8c82f
Kottner, Jan
50d0d629-8765-445b-b21d-11dbc4e6e504
Norton, Christine
1c77c449-6a2a-4d2c-a600-197faa925fed
Sooriah, Sangeeta
c1791deb-3d77-4f33-bd22-b7938de80311
Worsley, Peter R.
44bc022c-0bea-4df9-bfb7-f3469992bfa1
Woodward, Sue
fcf00367-04c2-4e26-adee-c86d30f96035
Graham, Tanya
8d1f961d-d8d9-48cb-83f3-ddeb8cf1746d
Beckley-Hoelscher, Nicholas
3cc5b860-eb85-4538-be6d-52fa2e0e4c9d
Beeckman, Dimitri
1ead183b-0e82-4b3f-864b-8dfc2e58de3e
Chatterton, Christopher
af7d3ec9-bc58-4efe-a2ed-229b73913469
Fader, Mandy
c318f942-2ddb-462a-9183-8b678faf7277
Fitzpatrick, Joanne M.
b356ea3e-95de-49dc-96c0-45fbabd51d03
Harris, Ruth
1e848808-be89-4f63-a62b-41ec65b8c82f
Kottner, Jan
50d0d629-8765-445b-b21d-11dbc4e6e504
Norton, Christine
1c77c449-6a2a-4d2c-a600-197faa925fed
Sooriah, Sangeeta
c1791deb-3d77-4f33-bd22-b7938de80311
Worsley, Peter R.
44bc022c-0bea-4df9-bfb7-f3469992bfa1

Woodward, Sue, Graham, Tanya, Beckley-Hoelscher, Nicholas, Beeckman, Dimitri, Chatterton, Christopher, Fader, Mandy, Fitzpatrick, Joanne M., Harris, Ruth, Kottner, Jan, Norton, Christine, Sooriah, Sangeeta and Worsley, Peter R. (2025) PREVENTion and treatment of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis (IAD) through optimising care: development and feasibility cluster randomised trial of the IAD-Manual (PREVENT-IAD). Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 11 (1), [151]. (doi:10.1186/s40814-025-01729-y).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) is prevalent in long-term care (LTC) facilities and homecare settings amongst adults who are incontinent of urine and/or faeces. Strategies to protect skin integrity are needed. This study aimed to co-design and test the feasibility of a training manual and care guidance (IAD-Manual) to prevent and treat IAD in LTC facilities and homecare settings.

Methods: this was a three-phase study: (1) developing the intervention, (2) designing the empirical study (a cluster RCT with an embedded process evaluation) to assess its effectiveness (not reported here) and (3) a 3-month feasibility study. The feasibility study recruited three LTC facilities and two homecare providers, randomising them (each as a cluster) to intervention or control. Process evaluation interviews with two care recipients, 11 family carers and 13 care staff implementing the IAD-Manual and their managers were conducted. Observations of 22 episodes of care assessed fidelity to the intervention. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. Summary feasibility outcome measures using means or proportions together with 95% confidence intervals were reported.

Results: five sites were recruited from 49 approached. All randomised sites were retained. Seventy-six (16% [95% CI: 13-20%]) of the 477 participants approached were randomised, of which 58 (76% [95% CI: 65-85%]) completed the study. Candidate IAD outcomes had complete or almost-complete 3-month outcome data in those participants remaining, whereas other outcome measures had contrastingly poor data completeness largely due to participant cognitive impairment. Process evaluation showed few potential participants had the capacity to consent, and gaining consultee approval was challenging. Care staff at study sites liked the IAD-Manual, describing it as 'helpful'. Twenty-eight people accessed the IAD-Manual online, and 15 care staff downloaded a certificate of completion of training. Intervention fidelity was not always observed.

Conclusions: it was feasible to develop the IAD-Manual. The RCT as designed was not feasible in its original form, with specific challenges regarding site and participant recruitment, governance and intervention fidelity.

Trial registration: this trial was prospectively registered on 07/02/2020 (intervention development) ISRCTN26169429 and 28/02/2024 (feasibility study) ISRCTN70866724.

Text
s40814-025-01729-y - Version of Record
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 October 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 November 2025
Published date: 26 November 2025
Keywords: Co-design, Feasibility cluster RCT, Incontinence-associated dermatitis, Intervention development, Long-term care (LTC), Prevention, Social care, Training manual, Treatment

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507958
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507958
ISSN: 2055-5784
PURE UUID: 4bb0082c-5c92-4a7a-a5b5-a3def66a82bb

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jan 2026 17:44
Last modified: 08 Jan 2026 17:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sue Woodward
Author: Tanya Graham
Author: Nicholas Beckley-Hoelscher
Author: Dimitri Beeckman
Author: Christopher Chatterton
Author: Mandy Fader
Author: Joanne M. Fitzpatrick
Author: Ruth Harris
Author: Jan Kottner
Author: Christine Norton
Author: Sangeeta Sooriah
Author: Peter R. Worsley

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×