Effectiveness of the knock-to-nudge approach for establishing contact with the respondents: evidence from the National Readership Survey in the UK
Effectiveness of the knock-to-nudge approach for establishing contact with the respondents: evidence from the National Readership Survey in the UK
The knock-to-nudge (KtN) approach was introduced in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic as an innovative method to enhance response rates in self-administered high-quality, probability-based surveys. This protocol includes face-to-face interviewers visiting sampled households to encourage participants to take part in a non-face-to-face survey at a later date. Initially implemented as a response to the COVID-19 restrictions, KtN proved successful in boosting response rates, and several UK agencies continued its use post-pandemic. However, the literature has not yet systematically evaluated how KtN affects sample representativeness,data quality, and substantive survey variables. We examine these aspects using data from the National Readership Survey (PAMCo), a mixed-mode survey that employs a two-stage recruitment process. The initial stage involves mail contact (invitation plus two reminders),with participants responding online or via a paper questionnaire. Non-responding households then receive personal visits, where interviewers first offer computer assisted-personal interviews (CAPI). Online and paper alternatives are offered to respondents only if they refuse the CAPI option. This final recruitment phase is referred to here as KtN. Our findings demonstrate that the KtN recruitment phase is associated with: (1) a significant increase in response rates, (2) improved sample composition, (3) higher item non-response, and (4) a greater proportion of respondents who do not read newspapers and magazines. These results suggest that KtN can be an effective tool for enhancing participation and representativeness in self-administered surveys. However, its viability as a universal solution for mixed-mode surveys depends on whether these methodological benefits outweigh the potential compromises in data quality and the additional implementation costs. As this approach is still very new, further research is needed to explore its effectiveness in other contexts.
Maslovskaya, Olga
9c979052-e9d7-4400-a657-38f1f9cd74d0
Domarchi, Cristian
12770dd9-ec99-4d57-acfc-4ca745b63f07
Smith, Peter W.F.
961a01a3-bf4c-43ca-9599-5be4fd5d3940
2 December 2025
Maslovskaya, Olga
9c979052-e9d7-4400-a657-38f1f9cd74d0
Domarchi, Cristian
12770dd9-ec99-4d57-acfc-4ca745b63f07
Smith, Peter W.F.
961a01a3-bf4c-43ca-9599-5be4fd5d3940
Maslovskaya, Olga, Domarchi, Cristian and Smith, Peter W.F.
(2025)
Effectiveness of the knock-to-nudge approach for establishing contact with the respondents: evidence from the National Readership Survey in the UK
(Survey Futures Working Papers, 10)
University of Essex
35pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
The knock-to-nudge (KtN) approach was introduced in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic as an innovative method to enhance response rates in self-administered high-quality, probability-based surveys. This protocol includes face-to-face interviewers visiting sampled households to encourage participants to take part in a non-face-to-face survey at a later date. Initially implemented as a response to the COVID-19 restrictions, KtN proved successful in boosting response rates, and several UK agencies continued its use post-pandemic. However, the literature has not yet systematically evaluated how KtN affects sample representativeness,data quality, and substantive survey variables. We examine these aspects using data from the National Readership Survey (PAMCo), a mixed-mode survey that employs a two-stage recruitment process. The initial stage involves mail contact (invitation plus two reminders),with participants responding online or via a paper questionnaire. Non-responding households then receive personal visits, where interviewers first offer computer assisted-personal interviews (CAPI). Online and paper alternatives are offered to respondents only if they refuse the CAPI option. This final recruitment phase is referred to here as KtN. Our findings demonstrate that the KtN recruitment phase is associated with: (1) a significant increase in response rates, (2) improved sample composition, (3) higher item non-response, and (4) a greater proportion of respondents who do not read newspapers and magazines. These results suggest that KtN can be an effective tool for enhancing participation and representativeness in self-administered surveys. However, its viability as a universal solution for mixed-mode surveys depends on whether these methodological benefits outweigh the potential compromises in data quality and the additional implementation costs. As this approach is still very new, further research is needed to explore its effectiveness in other contexts.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2 December 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 507976
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507976
PURE UUID: 466196c9-0201-4418-a7b0-911c1c895b23
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Jan 2026 17:55
Last modified: 09 Jan 2026 03:05
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Cristian Domarchi
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics