The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Digitalizing a brief intervention to reduce intrusive memories of psychological trauma for health care staff working during COVID-19: exploratory pilot study with nurses

Digitalizing a brief intervention to reduce intrusive memories of psychological trauma for health care staff working during COVID-19: exploratory pilot study with nurses
Digitalizing a brief intervention to reduce intrusive memories of psychological trauma for health care staff working during COVID-19: exploratory pilot study with nurses
Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the worldwide need for simple remotely delivered (digital) scalable interventions that can also be used preventatively to protect the mental health of health care staff exposed to psychologically traumatic events during their COVID-19–related work. We have developed a brief behavioral intervention that aims to reduce the number of intrusive memories of traumatic events but has only been delivered face-to-face so far. After digitalizing the intervention materials, the intervention was delivered digitally to target users (health care staff) for the first time. The adaption for staff’s working context in a hospital setting used a co-design approach.

Objective:
The aims of this mixed method exploratory pilot study with health care staff who experienced working in the pandemic were to pilot the intervention that we have digitalized (for remote delivery and with remote support) and adapted for this target population (health care staff working clinically during a pandemic) to explore its ability to reduce the number of intrusive memories of traumatic events and improve related symptoms (eg, posttraumatic stress) and participant’s perception of their functioning, and to explore the feasibility and acceptability of both the digitalized intervention and digitalized data collection.

Methods:
We worked closely with target users with lived experience of working clinically during the COVID-19 pandemic in a hospital context (registered nurses who experienced intrusive memories from traumatic events at work; N=3). We used a mixed method design and exploratory quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Results:
After completing the digitalized intervention once with remote researcher support (approximately 25 minutes) and a brief follow-up check-in, participants learned to use the intervention independently. All 3 participants reported zero intrusive memories during week 5 (primary outcome: 100% digital data capture). Prior to study inclusion, two or more intrusions in the week were reported preintervention (assessed retrospectively). There was a general pattern of symptom reduction and improvement in perceived functioning (eg, concentration) at follow-up. The digitalized intervention and data collection were perceived as feasible and rated as acceptable (eg, all 3 participants would recommend it to a colleague). Participants were positive toward the digital intervention as a useful tool that could readily be incorporated into work life and repeated in the face of ongoing or repeated trauma exposure.

Conclusions:
The intervention when delivered remotely and adapted for this population during the pandemic was well received by participants. Since it could be tailored around work and daily life and used preventatively, the intervention may hold promise for health care staff pending future evaluations of efficacy. Limitations include the small sample size, lack of daily intrusion frequency data in the week before the intervention, and lack of a control condition. Following this co-design process in adapting and improving intervention delivery and evaluation, the next step is to investigate the efficacy of the digitalized intervention in a randomized controlled trial.
Singh, Laura
1d79dded-61a6-4874-a333-470e169a6100
Kanstrup, Marie
5ca5fe0c-402a-425c-bf8e-40d3b79b900d
Depa, Katherine
4d6f7612-f1ad-4cd8-9817-aafe8d5671b3
Falk, Ann-Charlotte
82554d7d-4650-4a09-9704-e9f62826575c
Lindström, Veronica
89d910f2-9032-4976-9561-db52cfb934d4
Dahl, Oili
487b2b5e-48f5-45e7-9bd1-7dd3d0391845
Göransson, Katarina E
c90d9ca5-23a5-4b0e-85c3-f55548491000
Rudman, Ann
6d086f6b-b951-4fa4-a232-aea35fcea0eb
Holmes, Emily A
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469
Singh, Laura
1d79dded-61a6-4874-a333-470e169a6100
Kanstrup, Marie
5ca5fe0c-402a-425c-bf8e-40d3b79b900d
Depa, Katherine
4d6f7612-f1ad-4cd8-9817-aafe8d5671b3
Falk, Ann-Charlotte
82554d7d-4650-4a09-9704-e9f62826575c
Lindström, Veronica
89d910f2-9032-4976-9561-db52cfb934d4
Dahl, Oili
487b2b5e-48f5-45e7-9bd1-7dd3d0391845
Göransson, Katarina E
c90d9ca5-23a5-4b0e-85c3-f55548491000
Rudman, Ann
6d086f6b-b951-4fa4-a232-aea35fcea0eb
Holmes, Emily A
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469

Singh, Laura, Kanstrup, Marie, Depa, Katherine, Falk, Ann-Charlotte, Lindström, Veronica, Dahl, Oili, Göransson, Katarina E, Rudman, Ann and Holmes, Emily A (2021) Digitalizing a brief intervention to reduce intrusive memories of psychological trauma for health care staff working during COVID-19: exploratory pilot study with nurses. JMIR Formative Research, 5 (5), [e27473]. (doi:10.2196/27473).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the worldwide need for simple remotely delivered (digital) scalable interventions that can also be used preventatively to protect the mental health of health care staff exposed to psychologically traumatic events during their COVID-19–related work. We have developed a brief behavioral intervention that aims to reduce the number of intrusive memories of traumatic events but has only been delivered face-to-face so far. After digitalizing the intervention materials, the intervention was delivered digitally to target users (health care staff) for the first time. The adaption for staff’s working context in a hospital setting used a co-design approach.

Objective:
The aims of this mixed method exploratory pilot study with health care staff who experienced working in the pandemic were to pilot the intervention that we have digitalized (for remote delivery and with remote support) and adapted for this target population (health care staff working clinically during a pandemic) to explore its ability to reduce the number of intrusive memories of traumatic events and improve related symptoms (eg, posttraumatic stress) and participant’s perception of their functioning, and to explore the feasibility and acceptability of both the digitalized intervention and digitalized data collection.

Methods:
We worked closely with target users with lived experience of working clinically during the COVID-19 pandemic in a hospital context (registered nurses who experienced intrusive memories from traumatic events at work; N=3). We used a mixed method design and exploratory quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Results:
After completing the digitalized intervention once with remote researcher support (approximately 25 minutes) and a brief follow-up check-in, participants learned to use the intervention independently. All 3 participants reported zero intrusive memories during week 5 (primary outcome: 100% digital data capture). Prior to study inclusion, two or more intrusions in the week were reported preintervention (assessed retrospectively). There was a general pattern of symptom reduction and improvement in perceived functioning (eg, concentration) at follow-up. The digitalized intervention and data collection were perceived as feasible and rated as acceptable (eg, all 3 participants would recommend it to a colleague). Participants were positive toward the digital intervention as a useful tool that could readily be incorporated into work life and repeated in the face of ongoing or repeated trauma exposure.

Conclusions:
The intervention when delivered remotely and adapted for this population during the pandemic was well received by participants. Since it could be tailored around work and daily life and used preventatively, the intervention may hold promise for health care staff pending future evaluations of efficacy. Limitations include the small sample size, lack of daily intrusion frequency data in the week before the intervention, and lack of a control condition. Following this co-design process in adapting and improving intervention delivery and evaluation, the next step is to investigate the efficacy of the digitalized intervention in a randomized controlled trial.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 26 May 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507981
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507981
PURE UUID: 3e9444d4-40f0-4988-98a9-3d82f782635f
ORCID for Emily A Holmes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-3112

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jan 2026 17:55
Last modified: 10 Jan 2026 05:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Laura Singh
Author: Marie Kanstrup
Author: Katherine Depa
Author: Ann-Charlotte Falk
Author: Veronica Lindström
Author: Oili Dahl
Author: Katarina E Göransson
Author: Ann Rudman
Author: Emily A Holmes ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×