The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Cognitive flexibility moderates the efficacy of a visuospatial intervention following exposure to analog trauma

Cognitive flexibility moderates the efficacy of a visuospatial intervention following exposure to analog trauma
Cognitive flexibility moderates the efficacy of a visuospatial intervention following exposure to analog trauma
Objective: intrusive memories are the hallmark feature of Post-Traumatic-Stress-Disorder (PTSD). Recent studies have found that a visuospatial intervention after viewing traumatic films reduces intrusive memories in healthy individuals. However, many individuals still exhibit high levels of symptoms following such an intervention, warranting continued investigation into specific characteristics moderating intervention effect. One such candidate is cognitive flexibility, defined as the ability to update behavior in accordance with contextual demands. The present study aimed at examining the interactive effect of cognitive flexibility and a visuospatial intervention on intrusive memories, predicting that higher flexibility would be linked to stronger intervention effects.

Method: sixty participants (Mage = 29.07, SD = 4.23) completed a performance-based paradigm evaluating cognitive flexibility, watched traumatic films, and were allocated to either an intervention or control group. Intrusions were assessed by means of laboratory and ambulatory assessment, and the Impact of Events Scale – Revised (IES-R).

Results: participants in the intervention group experienced fewer laboratory intrusions than the control group. However, this effect was moderated by cognitive flexibility: Whereas individuals with below-average cognitive flexibility did not benefit from the intervention, it was significantly beneficial for individuals with average and above-average cognitive flexibility. No group differences emerged in the number of ambulatory intrusions or IES-R scores. However, cognitive flexibility was negatively correlated with IES-R scores across both groups.

Conclusions: these results highlight the significant role of cognitive flexibility in intrusion development, both in general and as a moderator of a visuospatial interventions. Future studies should investigate effects’ generalizability to clinical samples.
PsyArXiv Preprints
Hemi, Alla
efe3932e-cc2a-40ba-9163-7e1f61690965
Sopp, Roxanne
1b8c15f3-e533-4a2e-93d0-b8b781f91e62
Perel, Ariel
5f788749-11c7-4867-8a37-9231b244d1d9
Holmes, Emily A.
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469
Levy-Gigi, Einat
5b205ab8-0757-44fa-8f70-7eec2d6ae2a8
Hemi, Alla
efe3932e-cc2a-40ba-9163-7e1f61690965
Sopp, Roxanne
1b8c15f3-e533-4a2e-93d0-b8b781f91e62
Perel, Ariel
5f788749-11c7-4867-8a37-9231b244d1d9
Holmes, Emily A.
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469
Levy-Gigi, Einat
5b205ab8-0757-44fa-8f70-7eec2d6ae2a8

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Objective: intrusive memories are the hallmark feature of Post-Traumatic-Stress-Disorder (PTSD). Recent studies have found that a visuospatial intervention after viewing traumatic films reduces intrusive memories in healthy individuals. However, many individuals still exhibit high levels of symptoms following such an intervention, warranting continued investigation into specific characteristics moderating intervention effect. One such candidate is cognitive flexibility, defined as the ability to update behavior in accordance with contextual demands. The present study aimed at examining the interactive effect of cognitive flexibility and a visuospatial intervention on intrusive memories, predicting that higher flexibility would be linked to stronger intervention effects.

Method: sixty participants (Mage = 29.07, SD = 4.23) completed a performance-based paradigm evaluating cognitive flexibility, watched traumatic films, and were allocated to either an intervention or control group. Intrusions were assessed by means of laboratory and ambulatory assessment, and the Impact of Events Scale – Revised (IES-R).

Results: participants in the intervention group experienced fewer laboratory intrusions than the control group. However, this effect was moderated by cognitive flexibility: Whereas individuals with below-average cognitive flexibility did not benefit from the intervention, it was significantly beneficial for individuals with average and above-average cognitive flexibility. No group differences emerged in the number of ambulatory intrusions or IES-R scores. However, cognitive flexibility was negatively correlated with IES-R scores across both groups.

Conclusions: these results highlight the significant role of cognitive flexibility in intrusion development, both in general and as a moderator of a visuospatial interventions. Future studies should investigate effects’ generalizability to clinical samples.

Text
Pre-Print - Cognitive Flexibility Moderates the Efficacy of a Visuospatial Intervention Following Exposure to Analog Trauma - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (406kB)

More information

Published date: 24 November 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507989
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507989
PURE UUID: 61405f29-1820-4b7d-ad9e-a888eba1bc97
ORCID for Emily A. Holmes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-3112

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Jan 2026 17:36
Last modified: 10 Jan 2026 05:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alla Hemi
Author: Roxanne Sopp
Author: Ariel Perel
Author: Emily A. Holmes ORCID iD
Author: Einat Levy-Gigi

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×