Subtracting glitches from gravitational-wave detector data during the third LIGO-Virgo observing run
Subtracting glitches from gravitational-wave detector data during the third LIGO-Virgo observing run
Data from ground-based gravitational-wave detectors contains numerous short-duration instrumental artifacts, called ‘glitches’. The high rate of these artifacts in turn results in a significant fraction of gravitational-wave signals from compact binary coalescences overlapping glitches. In LIGO-Virgo’s third observing run, ≈20% of gravitational-wave source candidates required some form of mitigation due to glitches. This was the first observing run where glitch subtraction was included as a part of LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data analysis methods for a large fraction of detected gravitational-wave events. This work describes the methods to identify glitches, the decision process for deciding if mitigation was necessary, and the two algorithms, BayesWave and gwsubtract, that were used to model and subtract glitches. Through case studies of two events, GW190424_180648 and GW200129_065458, we evaluate the effectiveness of the glitch subtraction, compare the statistical uncertainties in the relevant glitch models, and identify potential limitations in these glitch subtraction methods. We finally outline the lessons learned from this first-of-its-kind effort for future observing runs.
data analysis methods, glitch subtraction, gravitational waves, interferometer, noise subtraction
Davis, D.
9c3ea68d-4a0f-4c7a-af82-df52a48adec4
Littenberg, T.B.
dfd9ebc6-a54f-4972-9cb7-f22bf61903f7
Romero-Shaw, I.M.
824e06ce-2b6a-4949-ac70-ffd574832a5a
Millhouse, M.
5b09c616-c019-455d-8fa7-65777b9470d1
McIver, J.
89e7bb4b-79bc-4ee1-9c12-afc0ec19751f
Di Renzo, F.
68cf4bdf-65aa-4b45-ba3e-0f0d81d61315
Ashton, G.
a8cec4b1-3c98-4b28-af2a-1e37cb3b9f2a
24 November 2022
Davis, D.
9c3ea68d-4a0f-4c7a-af82-df52a48adec4
Littenberg, T.B.
dfd9ebc6-a54f-4972-9cb7-f22bf61903f7
Romero-Shaw, I.M.
824e06ce-2b6a-4949-ac70-ffd574832a5a
Millhouse, M.
5b09c616-c019-455d-8fa7-65777b9470d1
McIver, J.
89e7bb4b-79bc-4ee1-9c12-afc0ec19751f
Di Renzo, F.
68cf4bdf-65aa-4b45-ba3e-0f0d81d61315
Ashton, G.
a8cec4b1-3c98-4b28-af2a-1e37cb3b9f2a
Davis, D., Littenberg, T.B., Romero-Shaw, I.M., Millhouse, M., McIver, J., Di Renzo, F. and Ashton, G.
(2022)
Subtracting glitches from gravitational-wave detector data during the third LIGO-Virgo observing run.
Classical and Quantum Gravity, 39 (24), [245013].
(doi:10.48550/arXiv.2207.03429).
Abstract
Data from ground-based gravitational-wave detectors contains numerous short-duration instrumental artifacts, called ‘glitches’. The high rate of these artifacts in turn results in a significant fraction of gravitational-wave signals from compact binary coalescences overlapping glitches. In LIGO-Virgo’s third observing run, ≈20% of gravitational-wave source candidates required some form of mitigation due to glitches. This was the first observing run where glitch subtraction was included as a part of LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA data analysis methods for a large fraction of detected gravitational-wave events. This work describes the methods to identify glitches, the decision process for deciding if mitigation was necessary, and the two algorithms, BayesWave and gwsubtract, that were used to model and subtract glitches. Through case studies of two events, GW190424_180648 and GW200129_065458, we evaluate the effectiveness of the glitch subtraction, compare the statistical uncertainties in the relevant glitch models, and identify potential limitations in these glitch subtraction methods. We finally outline the lessons learned from this first-of-its-kind effort for future observing runs.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 11 November 2022
Published date: 24 November 2022
Additional Information:
Funding Information: the authors thank the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Detector Characterization and Parameter Estimation groups for their input and suggestions during the development of this work. We thank Sophie Hourihane and Katerina Chatziioannou for discussions about BayesWave . We also thank Ronaldas Macas for their comments during internal review of this paper. D D is supported by the NSF as a part of the LIGO Laboratory. I M R-S acknowledges support received from the Herchel Smith Postdoctoral Fellowship Fund. Funding Information: This material is based upon work supported by NSF’s LIGO Laboratory which is a major facility fully funded by the National Science Foundation. LIGO was constructed by the California Institute of Technology and Massachusetts Institute of Technology with funding from the National Science Foundation, and operates under cooperative agreement PHY-1764464. Advanced LIGO was built under award PHY-0823459. The authors are grateful for computational resources provided by the LIGO Laboratory and supported by National Science Foundation Grants PHY-0757058 and PHY-0823459. This work carries LIGO document number P2200192. Funding Information: Parts of this research are supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery (OzGrav) (Project Number CE170100004) and ARC Discovery Project DP170103625.
Keywords:
data analysis methods, glitch subtraction, gravitational waves, interferometer, noise subtraction
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 508025
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/508025
ISSN: 0264-9381
PURE UUID: 6eba9698-8210-45f7-b00c-994a454e6360
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Jan 2026 17:58
Last modified: 13 Jan 2026 03:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
D. Davis
Author:
T.B. Littenberg
Author:
I.M. Romero-Shaw
Author:
M. Millhouse
Author:
J. McIver
Author:
F. Di Renzo
Author:
G. Ashton
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics