The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

When we should worry more: using cognitive bias modification to drive adaptive health behaviour

When we should worry more: using cognitive bias modification to drive adaptive health behaviour
When we should worry more: using cognitive bias modification to drive adaptive health behaviour
A lack of behavioural engagement in health promotion or disease prevention is a problem across many health domains. In these cases where people face a genuine danger, a reduced focus on threat and low levels of anxiety or worry are maladaptive in terms of promoting protection or prevention behaviour. Therefore, it is possible that increasing the processing of threat will increase worry and thereby enhance engagement in adaptive behaviour. Laboratory studies have shown that cognitive bias modification (CBM) can increase or decrease anxiety and worry when increased versus decreased processing of threat is encouraged. In the current study, CBM for interpretation (CBM-I) is used to target engagement in sun protection behaviour. The goal was to investigate whether inducing a negative rather than a positive interpretation bias for physical threat information can enhance worry elicited when viewing a health campaign video (warning against melanoma skin cancer), and consequently lead to more adaptive behaviour (sun protection). Participants were successfully trained to either adopt a positive or negative interpretation bias using physical threat scenarios. However, contrary to expectations results showed that participants in the positive training condition reported higher levels of worry elicited by the melanoma video than participants in the negative training condition. Video elicited worry was, however, positively correlated with a measure of engagement in sun protection behaviour, suggesting that higher levels of worry do promote adaptive behaviour. These findings imply that more research is needed to determine under which conditions increased versus decreased processing of threat can drive adaptive worry. Various potential explanations for the current findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.
1932-6203
Notebaert, Lies
9c95b7f8-7ebc-4294-84a5-8968706ed2dd
Chrystal, Jessica
65b6fb7e-5136-4cf6-bebf-4d177e011db3
Clarke, Patrick J.F.
99ed2064-fca7-4caa-beef-f6a11017b875
Holmes, Emily A.
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469
MacLeod, Colin
13efff1d-97c5-424f-828a-66a9687ff6a2
Notebaert, Lies
9c95b7f8-7ebc-4294-84a5-8968706ed2dd
Chrystal, Jessica
65b6fb7e-5136-4cf6-bebf-4d177e011db3
Clarke, Patrick J.F.
99ed2064-fca7-4caa-beef-f6a11017b875
Holmes, Emily A.
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469
MacLeod, Colin
13efff1d-97c5-424f-828a-66a9687ff6a2

Notebaert, Lies, Chrystal, Jessica, Clarke, Patrick J.F., Holmes, Emily A. and MacLeod, Colin (2014) When we should worry more: using cognitive bias modification to drive adaptive health behaviour. PLoS ONE, 9 (1), [e85092]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085092).

Record type: Article

Abstract

A lack of behavioural engagement in health promotion or disease prevention is a problem across many health domains. In these cases where people face a genuine danger, a reduced focus on threat and low levels of anxiety or worry are maladaptive in terms of promoting protection or prevention behaviour. Therefore, it is possible that increasing the processing of threat will increase worry and thereby enhance engagement in adaptive behaviour. Laboratory studies have shown that cognitive bias modification (CBM) can increase or decrease anxiety and worry when increased versus decreased processing of threat is encouraged. In the current study, CBM for interpretation (CBM-I) is used to target engagement in sun protection behaviour. The goal was to investigate whether inducing a negative rather than a positive interpretation bias for physical threat information can enhance worry elicited when viewing a health campaign video (warning against melanoma skin cancer), and consequently lead to more adaptive behaviour (sun protection). Participants were successfully trained to either adopt a positive or negative interpretation bias using physical threat scenarios. However, contrary to expectations results showed that participants in the positive training condition reported higher levels of worry elicited by the melanoma video than participants in the negative training condition. Video elicited worry was, however, positively correlated with a measure of engagement in sun protection behaviour, suggesting that higher levels of worry do promote adaptive behaviour. These findings imply that more research is needed to determine under which conditions increased versus decreased processing of threat can drive adaptive worry. Various potential explanations for the current findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Text
file (15) - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 November 2013
Published date: 8 January 2014

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 508028
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/508028
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: ec523878-43dd-4156-b1a5-d976298ed3e9
ORCID for Emily A. Holmes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-3112

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Jan 2026 17:30
Last modified: 17 Jan 2026 03:45

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lies Notebaert
Author: Jessica Chrystal
Author: Patrick J.F. Clarke
Author: Emily A. Holmes ORCID iD
Author: Colin MacLeod

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×