The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Supporting parent treatment decision-making in relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma: co-design of a web-based intervention

Supporting parent treatment decision-making in relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma: co-design of a web-based intervention
Supporting parent treatment decision-making in relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma: co-design of a web-based intervention
Background: parents of children diagnosed with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma become involved in making treatment decisions for their child due to an absence of no standard treatment protocol with no clear treatment endpoints. Relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma is a poor-prognosis childhood cancer with varying treatment options available depending on their child’s response to treatment. As a result, parents in partnership with their child’s medical team make repeated treatment decisions over time. Research has shown how this decision-making is influenced by uncertainty of their child’s response to treatments and overall outcome, and parents’ emotional and cognitive adjustments. Having time to research and gather information has also shown to enable and inform parent involvement and responsibility within decision-making. An intervention to support parents can help them navigate these complex decisions aiding their cognitive, emotional, and practical needs to enable and inform their decision-making.

Methods: intervention development followed the Medical Research Council Framework for developing complex intervention co-designed with a parent stakeholder group. A review of the literature and analysis of parent interviews informed the intervention. A one-off clinical advisory group was formed to review draft content. Intervention user testing was completed using cognitive think-aloud interviews.

Results: a web-based intervention was developed to support and facilitate parent treatment decision-making in relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma. Co-design was iterative with a combination of ten face-to-face and virtual workshops to discuss and develop the website content, design, and layout. User testing was completed with seven parents and findings informed changes which included reformatting web pages, reducing text paragraphs for easier reading, creating additional webpages for ease of navigation of information and providing parent quotes for authenticity. Recommendations for intervention development using co-design are provided based on our experiences of using this approach.

Conclusions: this is a disease specific intervention developed to support and facilitate parent treatment decision-making in a specific poor-prognosis childhood cancer. Co-design was essential to ensure the intervention met the needs of this parent population. Further work following the MRC framework will test and evaluate its impact and effectiveness in clinical practice.
1472-6947
Pearson, Helen
1a9dfc7a-f1fa-4152-a618-55a946e655db
Darlington, Anne-Sophie
472fcfc9-160b-4344-8113-8dd8760ff962
Gibson, Faith
b537d483-3f20-4f15-a9b8-880758746728
Myall, Michelle
0604ba0f-75c2-4783-9afe-aa54bf81513f
Pearson, Helen
1a9dfc7a-f1fa-4152-a618-55a946e655db
Darlington, Anne-Sophie
472fcfc9-160b-4344-8113-8dd8760ff962
Gibson, Faith
b537d483-3f20-4f15-a9b8-880758746728
Myall, Michelle
0604ba0f-75c2-4783-9afe-aa54bf81513f

Pearson, Helen, Darlington, Anne-Sophie, Gibson, Faith and Myall, Michelle (2026) Supporting parent treatment decision-making in relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma: co-design of a web-based intervention. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 26, [12]. (doi:10.1186/s12911-025-03313-z).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: parents of children diagnosed with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma become involved in making treatment decisions for their child due to an absence of no standard treatment protocol with no clear treatment endpoints. Relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma is a poor-prognosis childhood cancer with varying treatment options available depending on their child’s response to treatment. As a result, parents in partnership with their child’s medical team make repeated treatment decisions over time. Research has shown how this decision-making is influenced by uncertainty of their child’s response to treatments and overall outcome, and parents’ emotional and cognitive adjustments. Having time to research and gather information has also shown to enable and inform parent involvement and responsibility within decision-making. An intervention to support parents can help them navigate these complex decisions aiding their cognitive, emotional, and practical needs to enable and inform their decision-making.

Methods: intervention development followed the Medical Research Council Framework for developing complex intervention co-designed with a parent stakeholder group. A review of the literature and analysis of parent interviews informed the intervention. A one-off clinical advisory group was formed to review draft content. Intervention user testing was completed using cognitive think-aloud interviews.

Results: a web-based intervention was developed to support and facilitate parent treatment decision-making in relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma. Co-design was iterative with a combination of ten face-to-face and virtual workshops to discuss and develop the website content, design, and layout. User testing was completed with seven parents and findings informed changes which included reformatting web pages, reducing text paragraphs for easier reading, creating additional webpages for ease of navigation of information and providing parent quotes for authenticity. Recommendations for intervention development using co-design are provided based on our experiences of using this approach.

Conclusions: this is a disease specific intervention developed to support and facilitate parent treatment decision-making in a specific poor-prognosis childhood cancer. Co-design was essential to ensure the intervention met the needs of this parent population. Further work following the MRC framework will test and evaluate its impact and effectiveness in clinical practice.

Text
s12911-025-03313-z - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 3 December 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 December 2025
Published date: 12 January 2026

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 508165
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/508165
ISSN: 1472-6947
PURE UUID: d07a88f1-6133-4153-9377-3dc360697f24
ORCID for Helen Pearson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7388-3981
ORCID for Anne-Sophie Darlington: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4387-7278
ORCID for Michelle Myall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8733-7412

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Jan 2026 17:32
Last modified: 17 Jan 2026 02:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Helen Pearson ORCID iD
Author: Faith Gibson
Author: Michelle Myall ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×