The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Rethinking legal approaches to electronic bills of lading: from functional equivalence to a substantive approach

Rethinking legal approaches to electronic bills of lading: from functional equivalence to a substantive approach
Rethinking legal approaches to electronic bills of lading: from functional equivalence to a substantive approach
The transition from paper-based to electronic bills of lading represents a significant advancement in global trade, promising enhanced efficiency and security. However, this transition also raises complex regulatory challenges. Among the regulatory approaches, functional equivalence has become the cornerstone for legitimizing electronic bills of lading. Scholarship and practice have largely embraced this principle without subjecting it to sustained critical scrutiny, although a few scholars have questioned its limitations in the legal context. In other words, although functional equivalence has been widely accepted, its limitations in the legal context remain underexplored. This research aims to critically evaluate functional equivalence and explore potential alternative approaches to better address the emerging challenges posed by new technologies.
This research will first examine the theoretical underpinnings and historical foundations of functional equivalence. It will trace how this concept entered the field of law and became a regulatory approach for electronic records, including electronic bills of lading. The study will then evaluate how the principle was articulated in UNCITRAL's exploration of e-commerce and assess its adequacy in regulating electronic bills of lading, thereby laying the groundwork for a critical examination of its limitations.
Beyond evaluating functional equivalence, this thesis also draws on the regulatory explorations of other international organisations. The proposed substantive approach on controlled electronic records highlights issues of control, proprietary rights, and custody, offering a distinct perspective. Building on these insights, this thesis proposes a substantive approach as an alternative framework for regulating electronic bills of lading. This approach aims to move beyond functional equivalence by directly addressing the substantive legal requirements of electronic bills of lading.
University of Southampton
Xu, Tengjiao
94e88c31-536d-427c-897b-8d692b5b79a1
Xu, Tengjiao
94e88c31-536d-427c-897b-8d692b5b79a1
Hjalmarsson, Johanna
73a98539-9a14-4e63-bb53-5a7c365ad6e4

Xu, Tengjiao (2026) Rethinking legal approaches to electronic bills of lading: from functional equivalence to a substantive approach. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 250pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The transition from paper-based to electronic bills of lading represents a significant advancement in global trade, promising enhanced efficiency and security. However, this transition also raises complex regulatory challenges. Among the regulatory approaches, functional equivalence has become the cornerstone for legitimizing electronic bills of lading. Scholarship and practice have largely embraced this principle without subjecting it to sustained critical scrutiny, although a few scholars have questioned its limitations in the legal context. In other words, although functional equivalence has been widely accepted, its limitations in the legal context remain underexplored. This research aims to critically evaluate functional equivalence and explore potential alternative approaches to better address the emerging challenges posed by new technologies.
This research will first examine the theoretical underpinnings and historical foundations of functional equivalence. It will trace how this concept entered the field of law and became a regulatory approach for electronic records, including electronic bills of lading. The study will then evaluate how the principle was articulated in UNCITRAL's exploration of e-commerce and assess its adequacy in regulating electronic bills of lading, thereby laying the groundwork for a critical examination of its limitations.
Beyond evaluating functional equivalence, this thesis also draws on the regulatory explorations of other international organisations. The proposed substantive approach on controlled electronic records highlights issues of control, proprietary rights, and custody, offering a distinct perspective. Building on these insights, this thesis proposes a substantive approach as an alternative framework for regulating electronic bills of lading. This approach aims to move beyond functional equivalence by directly addressing the substantive legal requirements of electronic bills of lading.

Text
Thesis_Xu Tengjiao_Jan 6 - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (2MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Miss-Tengjiao-Xu
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: 6 January 2026

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 508289
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/508289
PURE UUID: 63716d42-4751-41df-af61-a295205eda0a
ORCID for Johanna Hjalmarsson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7362-811X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jan 2026 17:31
Last modified: 17 Jan 2026 02:41

Export record

Contributors

Author: Tengjiao Xu
Thesis advisor: Johanna Hjalmarsson ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×