The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparing gravitational waveform models for binary black hole mergers through a hypermodels approach

Comparing gravitational waveform models for binary black hole mergers through a hypermodels approach
Comparing gravitational waveform models for binary black hole mergers through a hypermodels approach
The inference of source parameters from gravitational-wave signals relies on theoretical models that describe the emitted waveform. Different model assumptions on which the computation of these models is based could lead to biases in the analysis of gravitational-wave data. In this work, we sample directly on four state-of-the-art binary black hole waveform models from different families, in order to investigate these systematic biases from the 13 heaviest gravitational-wave sources with moderate to high signal-to-noise ratios in the third Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC- 3). All models include spin-precession as well as higher-order modes. Using the "hypermodels" technique, we treat the waveform models as one of the sampled parameters, therefore directly getting the odds ratio of one waveform model over another from a single parameter estimation run. From the joint odds ratio over all 13 sources, we find the model NRSur7dq4 to be favoured over SEOBNRv4PHM, with an odds ratio of 29.43; IMRPhenomXPHM and IMRPhenomTPHM have an odds ratio, respectively, of 4.70 and 5.09 over SEOBNRv4PHM. However, this result is mainly determined by three events that show a strong preference for some of the models and that are all affected by possible data quality issues. If we do not consider these potentially problematic events, the odds ratio do not exhibit a significant preference for any of the models. Although further work studying a larger set of signals will be needed for robust quantitative results, the presented method highlights one possible avenue for future waveform model development.
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
1550-7998
Puecher, Anna
4d72776c-b895-41ea-8f1b-1980eb18dbb1
Samajdar, Anuradha
73999454-025e-4cd5-9e70-50f0ac5b3895
Ashton, Gregory
a8cec4b1-3c98-4b28-af2a-1e37cb3b9f2a
Van Den Broeck, Chris
5abd8e97-efd3-4786-8c0f-2587d6195607
Dietrich, Tim
08a88c32-5baa-475f-bb18-f50f48fbe8f6
Puecher, Anna
4d72776c-b895-41ea-8f1b-1980eb18dbb1
Samajdar, Anuradha
73999454-025e-4cd5-9e70-50f0ac5b3895
Ashton, Gregory
a8cec4b1-3c98-4b28-af2a-1e37cb3b9f2a
Van Den Broeck, Chris
5abd8e97-efd3-4786-8c0f-2587d6195607
Dietrich, Tim
08a88c32-5baa-475f-bb18-f50f48fbe8f6

Puecher, Anna, Samajdar, Anuradha, Ashton, Gregory, Van Den Broeck, Chris and Dietrich, Tim (2024) Comparing gravitational waveform models for binary black hole mergers through a hypermodels approach. Physical Review D, 109 (2), [023019]. (doi:10.48550/arXiv.2310.03555).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The inference of source parameters from gravitational-wave signals relies on theoretical models that describe the emitted waveform. Different model assumptions on which the computation of these models is based could lead to biases in the analysis of gravitational-wave data. In this work, we sample directly on four state-of-the-art binary black hole waveform models from different families, in order to investigate these systematic biases from the 13 heaviest gravitational-wave sources with moderate to high signal-to-noise ratios in the third Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC- 3). All models include spin-precession as well as higher-order modes. Using the "hypermodels" technique, we treat the waveform models as one of the sampled parameters, therefore directly getting the odds ratio of one waveform model over another from a single parameter estimation run. From the joint odds ratio over all 13 sources, we find the model NRSur7dq4 to be favoured over SEOBNRv4PHM, with an odds ratio of 29.43; IMRPhenomXPHM and IMRPhenomTPHM have an odds ratio, respectively, of 4.70 and 5.09 over SEOBNRv4PHM. However, this result is mainly determined by three events that show a strong preference for some of the models and that are all affected by possible data quality issues. If we do not consider these potentially problematic events, the odds ratio do not exhibit a significant preference for any of the models. Although further work studying a larger set of signals will be needed for robust quantitative results, the presented method highlights one possible avenue for future waveform model development.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 8 December 2023
Published date: 11 January 2024
Keywords: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 508291
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/508291
ISSN: 1550-7998
PURE UUID: d6854cbc-1e8c-4912-acc7-a590d5665e18
ORCID for Gregory Ashton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-2231

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jan 2026 17:32
Last modified: 20 Jan 2026 03:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Anna Puecher
Author: Anuradha Samajdar
Author: Gregory Ashton ORCID iD
Author: Chris Van Den Broeck
Author: Tim Dietrich

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×