The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reading others’ social appraisals after viewing an aversive film online impacts mood but not intrusive memories

Reading others’ social appraisals after viewing an aversive film online impacts mood but not intrusive memories
Reading others’ social appraisals after viewing an aversive film online impacts mood but not intrusive memories

Exposure to aversive footage online can affect our well-being, but to what extent does reading others’ appraisals of this content modulate our affective responses? In a pre-registered online study (N = 170), we used a digital trauma film paradigm as an analogue for the naturalistic exposure to aversive visual content online. We investigated whether online social reappraisal about the film influenced acute affective responses and subsequent intrusive memories. First, we examined whether the digital trauma film paradigm induced similar affective responses as in-lab experiments (within-subjects; change in negative mood and intrusive memories of the film during seven days). Participants reported a negative mood change and experienced intrusive memories of the film, extending findings from in-lab experiments. Next, we tested a social reappraisal manipulation that provides written comments from (fictitious) previous participants (between-subjects; reading positive, negative, or no comments) modulated participants’ affective responses. As predicted, relative to controls and negative comments, reading positive comments decreased negative mood. However, reading negative comments did not increase negative mood. Contrary to predictions, the social reappraisal manipulation did not modulate the number of intrusive memories. Findings suggest the benefit of positive social reappraisal for mitigating negative mood, but not intrusive memories following aversive film content online.

Intrusive memories, Negative mood, Online study, Social reappraisal, Trauma analogue, Trauma film paradigm
0887-6185
Espinosa, Lisa
9d88a6e7-2196-47dd-ad7a-60607b0dbe5a
Singh, Laura
1d79dded-61a6-4874-a333-470e169a6100
Eimer, Tabea
1a48963a-deee-4789-a8e2-1bdf15fad4d5
Olsson, Andreas
4b80d27e-5e76-47a4-ab36-cfb7835b63e4
Holmes, Emily A.
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469
Espinosa, Lisa
9d88a6e7-2196-47dd-ad7a-60607b0dbe5a
Singh, Laura
1d79dded-61a6-4874-a333-470e169a6100
Eimer, Tabea
1a48963a-deee-4789-a8e2-1bdf15fad4d5
Olsson, Andreas
4b80d27e-5e76-47a4-ab36-cfb7835b63e4
Holmes, Emily A.
a6379ab3-b182-45f8-87c9-3e07e90fe469

Espinosa, Lisa, Singh, Laura, Eimer, Tabea, Olsson, Andreas and Holmes, Emily A. (2023) Reading others’ social appraisals after viewing an aversive film online impacts mood but not intrusive memories. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 99, [102763]. (doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102763).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Exposure to aversive footage online can affect our well-being, but to what extent does reading others’ appraisals of this content modulate our affective responses? In a pre-registered online study (N = 170), we used a digital trauma film paradigm as an analogue for the naturalistic exposure to aversive visual content online. We investigated whether online social reappraisal about the film influenced acute affective responses and subsequent intrusive memories. First, we examined whether the digital trauma film paradigm induced similar affective responses as in-lab experiments (within-subjects; change in negative mood and intrusive memories of the film during seven days). Participants reported a negative mood change and experienced intrusive memories of the film, extending findings from in-lab experiments. Next, we tested a social reappraisal manipulation that provides written comments from (fictitious) previous participants (between-subjects; reading positive, negative, or no comments) modulated participants’ affective responses. As predicted, relative to controls and negative comments, reading positive comments decreased negative mood. However, reading negative comments did not increase negative mood. Contrary to predictions, the social reappraisal manipulation did not modulate the number of intrusive memories. Findings suggest the benefit of positive social reappraisal for mitigating negative mood, but not intrusive memories following aversive film content online.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 August 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 August 2023
Published date: 30 August 2023
Additional Information: This study was founded by a Consolidator Grant (2018-00877) from the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet) and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW 2014.0237) to Andreas Olsson. EAH is on the Board of Trustees of the MQ Foundation. EAH receives funding from the Wellcome Trust (223016/Z/21/Z), Swedish Research Council (2020–00873), Rannís The Icelandic Research Fund (228741–051), OAK foundation (OCAY-18–442), The Lupina Foundation and AFA Försäkring (200342).
Keywords: Intrusive memories, Negative mood, Online study, Social reappraisal, Trauma analogue, Trauma film paradigm

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 508415
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/508415
ISSN: 0887-6185
PURE UUID: 9ba3d1f0-0763-4f21-a89a-2ea53a5fb28a
ORCID for Emily A. Holmes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-3112

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Jan 2026 17:30
Last modified: 22 Jan 2026 03:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lisa Espinosa
Author: Laura Singh
Author: Tabea Eimer
Author: Andreas Olsson
Author: Emily A. Holmes ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×