The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An integrative approach to implementing biodiversity net gain at the regional level

An integrative approach to implementing biodiversity net gain at the regional level
An integrative approach to implementing biodiversity net gain at the regional level
Biodiversity offsetting has emerged as an increasingly popular policy tool aiming to ensure that housing development associated with urban expansion can benefit nature. Offsets compensate for biodiversity losses from development by creating, restoring, or enhancing habitats, aiming to achieve either no net loss or a net gain in biodiversity. The effectiveness of this approach depends not only on the quantity and condition of the offsets but also on their spatial placement, which can be either on the development site or elsewhere. We present a spatially explicit modelling framework designed to explore how offset location affects biodiversity outcomes and ecosystem service co-benefits at the regional scale - the scale at which infrastructure planning decisions are generally made - using an English region (Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire) undergoing significant housing growth as a case study. Findings reveal that closest proximity-driven offsetting underperforms in terms of biodiversity outcomes (species richness) and opportunity costs of agriculture. In contrast, regional prioritisation aligned with strategically planned conservation networks (i.e., regional Nature Recovery Networks), delivers the greatest increase in species richness (12%) and lower opportunity costs. In separate scenarios, restricting offsets to administrative planning boundaries yielded even lower opportunity costs and higher values for co-benefits (carbon sequestration and flood damage avoided costs), although this restriction resulted in a smaller percentage increase in species richness. These results demonstrate the value of strategic planning in guiding biodiversity offsetting implementation and highlight the potential for Nature Recovery Networks or similar conservation networks to enhance biodiversity outcomes at the regional scale.
biodiversity net gain, biodiversity offsetting, Nature recovery networks
SocArXiv
Collins, Rebecca M.
2ecdff66-29af-40e5-94aa-4750e6f3fe1b
Mancini, Mattia C.
30e0e392-2fc7-4e46-8043-d365d21c8a92
Bateman, Ian
d011d2cb-b2c0-413c-9106-03111d1a96a8
Bull, Joseph W.
ecf513e2-9c38-4e9b-b073-6376e5ad188b
Duffus, Natalie E.
5a625139-baec-45b4-8190-ea844a944e3a
Groom, Ben
fccd9637-30f6-414d-821f-fa20c46fb000
Milner-Gulland, E.J.
5d18012c-ae32-4064-8c1d-5f78fb3e08bf
Smith, Robert J.
6fd938df-fd55-4742-b24f-4b81266a9c4a
Ermgassen, Sophus O.S.E.
26c70d14-d400-4e87-9804-ea809a166aeb
Eigenbrod, Felix
43efc6ae-b129-45a2-8a34-e489b5f05827
Collins, Rebecca M.
2ecdff66-29af-40e5-94aa-4750e6f3fe1b
Mancini, Mattia C.
30e0e392-2fc7-4e46-8043-d365d21c8a92
Bateman, Ian
d011d2cb-b2c0-413c-9106-03111d1a96a8
Bull, Joseph W.
ecf513e2-9c38-4e9b-b073-6376e5ad188b
Duffus, Natalie E.
5a625139-baec-45b4-8190-ea844a944e3a
Groom, Ben
fccd9637-30f6-414d-821f-fa20c46fb000
Milner-Gulland, E.J.
5d18012c-ae32-4064-8c1d-5f78fb3e08bf
Smith, Robert J.
6fd938df-fd55-4742-b24f-4b81266a9c4a
Ermgassen, Sophus O.S.E.
26c70d14-d400-4e87-9804-ea809a166aeb
Eigenbrod, Felix
43efc6ae-b129-45a2-8a34-e489b5f05827

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Biodiversity offsetting has emerged as an increasingly popular policy tool aiming to ensure that housing development associated with urban expansion can benefit nature. Offsets compensate for biodiversity losses from development by creating, restoring, or enhancing habitats, aiming to achieve either no net loss or a net gain in biodiversity. The effectiveness of this approach depends not only on the quantity and condition of the offsets but also on their spatial placement, which can be either on the development site or elsewhere. We present a spatially explicit modelling framework designed to explore how offset location affects biodiversity outcomes and ecosystem service co-benefits at the regional scale - the scale at which infrastructure planning decisions are generally made - using an English region (Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire) undergoing significant housing growth as a case study. Findings reveal that closest proximity-driven offsetting underperforms in terms of biodiversity outcomes (species richness) and opportunity costs of agriculture. In contrast, regional prioritisation aligned with strategically planned conservation networks (i.e., regional Nature Recovery Networks), delivers the greatest increase in species richness (12%) and lower opportunity costs. In separate scenarios, restricting offsets to administrative planning boundaries yielded even lower opportunity costs and higher values for co-benefits (carbon sequestration and flood damage avoided costs), although this restriction resulted in a smaller percentage increase in species richness. These results demonstrate the value of strategic planning in guiding biodiversity offsetting implementation and highlight the potential for Nature Recovery Networks or similar conservation networks to enhance biodiversity outcomes at the regional scale.

Text
251031_Regional_anaylsis_paper - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (3MB)

More information

Published date: 31 October 2025
Keywords: biodiversity net gain, biodiversity offsetting, Nature recovery networks

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 508679
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/508679
PURE UUID: be6a3052-daeb-423a-87c4-258f6f99ccac
ORCID for Rebecca M. Collins: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1681-0860
ORCID for Felix Eigenbrod: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8982-824X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jan 2026 17:46
Last modified: 31 Jan 2026 07:58

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rebecca M. Collins ORCID iD
Author: Mattia C. Mancini
Author: Ian Bateman
Author: Joseph W. Bull
Author: Natalie E. Duffus
Author: Ben Groom
Author: E.J. Milner-Gulland
Author: Robert J. Smith
Author: Sophus O.S.E. Ermgassen
Author: Felix Eigenbrod ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×