The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Judges’ gender and sentencing in China: an empirical inquiry

Judges’ gender and sentencing in China: an empirical inquiry
Judges’ gender and sentencing in China: an empirical inquiry
Although mixed results regarding judges’ gender disparity in sentencing have been uncovered globally by comparatists, China has yet to be considered. Based on documents of adjudication decisions collected from two cities, we examined district court judges’ sentencing decisions. Multilevel-multivariate analysis reveals negligible differences between male and female judges. We conclude that the similarities in the decision to incarcerate can be explained by the harmonious “Iron Triangle” relationship among the police, the procuratorate, and the court. We also indicate that the Sentencing Guidelines and the Adjudication Committee are mechanisms that shape judicial behaviors in the same direction.
1557-0851
217 - 250
Wei, Shuai
ed6e3497-083e-4551-8899-1437137f3995
Xiong, Moulin
135b2dfc-ebf6-45e1-a99a-60e8389b955d
Wei, Shuai
ed6e3497-083e-4551-8899-1437137f3995
Xiong, Moulin
135b2dfc-ebf6-45e1-a99a-60e8389b955d

Wei, Shuai and Xiong, Moulin (2020) Judges’ gender and sentencing in China: an empirical inquiry. Feminist Criminology, 15 (2), 217 - 250. (doi:10.1177/1557085119842660).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Although mixed results regarding judges’ gender disparity in sentencing have been uncovered globally by comparatists, China has yet to be considered. Based on documents of adjudication decisions collected from two cities, we examined district court judges’ sentencing decisions. Multilevel-multivariate analysis reveals negligible differences between male and female judges. We conclude that the similarities in the decision to incarcerate can be explained by the harmonious “Iron Triangle” relationship among the police, the procuratorate, and the court. We also indicate that the Sentencing Guidelines and the Adjudication Committee are mechanisms that shape judicial behaviors in the same direction.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 17 April 2019
Published date: April 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 508747
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/508747
ISSN: 1557-0851
PURE UUID: 4fc720d7-ad85-44cb-8912-a255d2af8732
ORCID for Shuai Wei: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9627-787X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Feb 2026 17:31
Last modified: 04 Feb 2026 03:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Shuai Wei ORCID iD
Author: Moulin Xiong

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×