The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

What stops UK audiologists using remote care tools to care for adults with cochlear implants?

What stops UK audiologists using remote care tools to care for adults with cochlear implants?
What stops UK audiologists using remote care tools to care for adults with cochlear implants?
Objectives: to identify barriers that audiologists face in adopting telemedicine in adult cochlear implant care, and to determine what is needed to overcome these barriers.

Methods: prospective mixed-methods anonymous online survey of cochlear implant audiologists working with adults in the United Kingdom. The questions covered their perception of effectiveness and value of remote care, their technical skills and training, their perception of patient readiness, workplace support and integration, reimbursement, regulatory and privacy concerns, and remote care technical issues.

Results: thirty-one complete responses were received in August - September 2024. Eighty-seven percent (27) had used remote care tools in their care of adults with cochlear implants. Twenty-nine percent (9) had never used remote care tools or used them rarely; no respondents used them daily. All respondents felt there were benefits to remote care tools – mostly to both clinicians and patients. Thirteen percent (4) felt the benefit was to patients only (not clinicians), and most felt that patients wanted to use them. Training and workplace support were sufficient, and reimbursement and data privacy were not barriers. Sixty-eight percent of respondents reported frequent technical issues with remote care tools. Respondents were split equally when asked if remote care is less effective than in-person care, but 81% felt that the gold standard of clinical care is in-person care. Barriers to remote care could be overcome by improvements and enhancements to the cochlear implant manufacturers’ tools, and easier and fuller integration into patient pathways and systems.

Conclusion: the main barriers to audiologists using remote care were frequent technical problems and the perception that the gold standard of clinical care was in-person care. The technical barriers can mostly be overcome by improvements in the cochlear implant manufacturers’ tools, although hospital managers can ensure better technical support, and easier integration into clinic pathways and systems. When telemedicine offers a seamless, accessible, person-centred care experience, perceptions about the gold standard of care may change.
1467-0100
Cullington, Helen
a8b72e6d-2788-406d-aefe-d7f34ee6e10e
Sardar Sheriff, Sajitha
84152b5f-68f2-41a1-af17-9d7e9310b3e7
Cullington, Helen
a8b72e6d-2788-406d-aefe-d7f34ee6e10e
Sardar Sheriff, Sajitha
84152b5f-68f2-41a1-af17-9d7e9310b3e7

Cullington, Helen and Sardar Sheriff, Sajitha (2025) What stops UK audiologists using remote care tools to care for adults with cochlear implants? Cochlear Implants International. (doi:10.1080/14670100.2025.2605820). (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: to identify barriers that audiologists face in adopting telemedicine in adult cochlear implant care, and to determine what is needed to overcome these barriers.

Methods: prospective mixed-methods anonymous online survey of cochlear implant audiologists working with adults in the United Kingdom. The questions covered their perception of effectiveness and value of remote care, their technical skills and training, their perception of patient readiness, workplace support and integration, reimbursement, regulatory and privacy concerns, and remote care technical issues.

Results: thirty-one complete responses were received in August - September 2024. Eighty-seven percent (27) had used remote care tools in their care of adults with cochlear implants. Twenty-nine percent (9) had never used remote care tools or used them rarely; no respondents used them daily. All respondents felt there were benefits to remote care tools – mostly to both clinicians and patients. Thirteen percent (4) felt the benefit was to patients only (not clinicians), and most felt that patients wanted to use them. Training and workplace support were sufficient, and reimbursement and data privacy were not barriers. Sixty-eight percent of respondents reported frequent technical issues with remote care tools. Respondents were split equally when asked if remote care is less effective than in-person care, but 81% felt that the gold standard of clinical care is in-person care. Barriers to remote care could be overcome by improvements and enhancements to the cochlear implant manufacturers’ tools, and easier and fuller integration into patient pathways and systems.

Conclusion: the main barriers to audiologists using remote care were frequent technical problems and the perception that the gold standard of clinical care was in-person care. The technical barriers can mostly be overcome by improvements in the cochlear implant manufacturers’ tools, although hospital managers can ensure better technical support, and easier integration into clinic pathways and systems. When telemedicine offers a seamless, accessible, person-centred care experience, perceptions about the gold standard of care may change.

Text
manuscript with author details revised - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 14 December 2026.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 December 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 508983
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/508983
ISSN: 1467-0100
PURE UUID: a1ec4b73-459a-4ba2-ac6e-80532122a714
ORCID for Helen Cullington: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5093-2020

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Feb 2026 17:51
Last modified: 10 Feb 2026 02:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sajitha Sardar Sheriff

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×