Where do they go? A review of the wastewater treatment process and its impact on the fate of microplastics
Where do they go? A review of the wastewater treatment process and its impact on the fate of microplastics
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are facilities designed to sanitise wastewater (WW) from different sources. A WW treatment process combines physical, chemical and biological reactions divided into 3 or 4 stages, according to the effluent standards of each site. WWTPs are intended to remove certain pollutants from the water stream, but not microplastics (MPs), plastic particles ranging from 5 mm to 1 µm. WWTPs work as source and destination for MPs. This review provides an insight into the stages included in WW treatment processes according to different technologies employed, alongside a critical evaluation of their influence on MPs. Relevant information and knowledge gaps have been identified. The removal of MPs depends on a variety of factors than just the type of incoming water or WWTP location. The most significant removal of MPs from WW occurs during the preliminary and primary stages. MPs removal efficiency fluctuates depending on the systems operating during the secondary and tertiary phases. As the comparison of information between studies is complicated due to the units and terms used to report and label the collected WW, we recommend that (1) kg/day units are applied if mass balance is of interest, and number of particles per L/day, considering the flow rate data from the sampling dates or annual average flow; (2) to further explain the selection criteria to classify MPs based on their size; and (3) to reach a consensus to name and identify the sampling points, such as the raw WW and effluent from the next stages.
Wastewater treatment plant, Microplastics, Sludge, Effluent, Wastewater Treatment Plant
84-98
Landeros Gonzalez, Guadalupe Vianey
3940790a-f3d6-4b78-a6f9-2dba60c4bc23
Landeros, Lupita
85e579f0-3420-4130-bfce-511be756f92d
Dominguez Cortinas, Gabriela
f1d228b2-3d12-4ee9-b417-8b53cf71cbff
Hudson, Malcolm
1ae18506-6f2a-48af-8c72-83ab28679f55
Shaw, Peter
935dfebf-9fb6-483c-86da-a21dba8c1989
Williams, Ian D.
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22
30 March 2025
Landeros Gonzalez, Guadalupe Vianey
3940790a-f3d6-4b78-a6f9-2dba60c4bc23
Landeros, Lupita
85e579f0-3420-4130-bfce-511be756f92d
Dominguez Cortinas, Gabriela
f1d228b2-3d12-4ee9-b417-8b53cf71cbff
Hudson, Malcolm
1ae18506-6f2a-48af-8c72-83ab28679f55
Shaw, Peter
935dfebf-9fb6-483c-86da-a21dba8c1989
Williams, Ian D.
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22
Landeros Gonzalez, Guadalupe Vianey, Landeros, Lupita, Dominguez Cortinas, Gabriela, Hudson, Malcolm, Shaw, Peter and Williams, Ian D.
(2025)
Where do they go? A review of the wastewater treatment process and its impact on the fate of microplastics.
Detritus, 30, .
(doi:10.31025/2611-4135/2025.19466).
Abstract
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are facilities designed to sanitise wastewater (WW) from different sources. A WW treatment process combines physical, chemical and biological reactions divided into 3 or 4 stages, according to the effluent standards of each site. WWTPs are intended to remove certain pollutants from the water stream, but not microplastics (MPs), plastic particles ranging from 5 mm to 1 µm. WWTPs work as source and destination for MPs. This review provides an insight into the stages included in WW treatment processes according to different technologies employed, alongside a critical evaluation of their influence on MPs. Relevant information and knowledge gaps have been identified. The removal of MPs depends on a variety of factors than just the type of incoming water or WWTP location. The most significant removal of MPs from WW occurs during the preliminary and primary stages. MPs removal efficiency fluctuates depending on the systems operating during the secondary and tertiary phases. As the comparison of information between studies is complicated due to the units and terms used to report and label the collected WW, we recommend that (1) kg/day units are applied if mass balance is of interest, and number of particles per L/day, considering the flow rate data from the sampling dates or annual average flow; (2) to further explain the selection criteria to classify MPs based on their size; and (3) to reach a consensus to name and identify the sampling points, such as the raw WW and effluent from the next stages.
Text
DETRITUS 30-2025_pages 84-98_DJ-24-074
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Accepted/In press manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 24 January 2025
Published date: 30 March 2025
Keywords:
Wastewater treatment plant, Microplastics, Sludge, Effluent, Wastewater Treatment Plant
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 509031
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509031
ISSN: 2611-4135
PURE UUID: eb5e5d9d-9f6a-4b90-87ff-4b8e472046f9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 Feb 2026 17:42
Last modified: 11 Feb 2026 02:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Guadalupe Vianey Landeros Gonzalez
Author:
Lupita Landeros
Author:
Gabriela Dominguez Cortinas
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics