The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Modeling validation of tubing compaction for rigless well plug and abandonment

Modeling validation of tubing compaction for rigless well plug and abandonment
Modeling validation of tubing compaction for rigless well plug and abandonment
Conventional well plug and abandonment (P&A) can sever and remove the tubing to access casing or leave it in situ when it does not interfere with providing a seal over an indefinite time frame. This paper assesses the viability of pushing rather than pulling severed production tubing to gain casing access. The P&A decision to push, pull, or leave the tubing in situ depends on confirming existing seals and then placing suitable sealants, such as cement, to keep the risks of future well leakages as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP). Pushing or compacting tubing into the liquid space of a well could be used with smaller rigless units, which cannot hoist the production tubing, but can use production intervention or decommissioning logistics with coiled tubing or wireline cutting and severance. Associated pumps could then drive an inflatable piston to compact split and severed tubing into a lower liquid space to access casing for logging and P&A plugging. Rigless tools and methods have provided dramatic cost savings where casing access was not needed, and thus the present study investigates the viability of accessing casing by means of pushing or compacting tubing to extend rigless P&A use and savings. The viability of pushing and compacting North Sea sizes and grades were confirmed in real‐scale physical‐compaction simulations of production‐tubing joints pulled from offshore wells. Independent small‐scale physical simulations and numerical modeling then confirmed that the real‐scale results were predictable and repeatable to demonstrate an ability to design and provide a window or gap in a production‐tubing string for use by other P&A methods.
1064-6671
101-117
Tunget, Bruce
e0be1d1f-27f7-4de2-bea1-bcb2eef71366
Lu, Pengyuan
981cde56-fbcd-4607-8360-c09cf56e5992
Cammarano, Andrea
c0c85f55-3dfc-4b97-9b79-e2554406a12b
Karimi, Nader
620646d6-27c9-4e1e-948f-f23e4a1e773a
Paul, Manosh
e1054c74-4d6c-41b7-b384-9935b956dfd5
Tunget, Bruce
e0be1d1f-27f7-4de2-bea1-bcb2eef71366
Lu, Pengyuan
981cde56-fbcd-4607-8360-c09cf56e5992
Cammarano, Andrea
c0c85f55-3dfc-4b97-9b79-e2554406a12b
Karimi, Nader
620646d6-27c9-4e1e-948f-f23e4a1e773a
Paul, Manosh
e1054c74-4d6c-41b7-b384-9935b956dfd5

Tunget, Bruce, Lu, Pengyuan, Cammarano, Andrea, Karimi, Nader and Paul, Manosh (2021) Modeling validation of tubing compaction for rigless well plug and abandonment. SPE Drilling & Completion, 36 (01), 101-117. (doi:10.2118/201214-PA).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Conventional well plug and abandonment (P&A) can sever and remove the tubing to access casing or leave it in situ when it does not interfere with providing a seal over an indefinite time frame. This paper assesses the viability of pushing rather than pulling severed production tubing to gain casing access. The P&A decision to push, pull, or leave the tubing in situ depends on confirming existing seals and then placing suitable sealants, such as cement, to keep the risks of future well leakages as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP). Pushing or compacting tubing into the liquid space of a well could be used with smaller rigless units, which cannot hoist the production tubing, but can use production intervention or decommissioning logistics with coiled tubing or wireline cutting and severance. Associated pumps could then drive an inflatable piston to compact split and severed tubing into a lower liquid space to access casing for logging and P&A plugging. Rigless tools and methods have provided dramatic cost savings where casing access was not needed, and thus the present study investigates the viability of accessing casing by means of pushing or compacting tubing to extend rigless P&A use and savings. The viability of pushing and compacting North Sea sizes and grades were confirmed in real‐scale physical‐compaction simulations of production‐tubing joints pulled from offshore wells. Independent small‐scale physical simulations and numerical modeling then confirmed that the real‐scale results were predictable and repeatable to demonstrate an ability to design and provide a window or gap in a production‐tubing string for use by other P&A methods.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 17 March 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509139
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509139
ISSN: 1064-6671
PURE UUID: eb395535-cf27-4c26-bd76-7057308804ca
ORCID for Andrea Cammarano: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8222-8150
ORCID for Nader Karimi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-6245

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Feb 2026 17:59
Last modified: 12 Feb 2026 03:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Bruce Tunget
Author: Pengyuan Lu
Author: Andrea Cammarano ORCID iD
Author: Nader Karimi ORCID iD
Author: Manosh Paul

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×