Reassessing coastal state rights and jurisdiction under UNCLOS: legal implications of unmanned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operations
Reassessing coastal state rights and jurisdiction under UNCLOS: legal implications of unmanned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operations
This thesis examines the legality of unmanned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Although UNCLOS constitutes the fundamental legal framework of the law of the sea, it was negotiated without consideration of rapid technological advances, particularly the advent of unmanned systems. The increasing integration of unmanned maritime vehicles (UMVs) into ISR operations raises novel legal and practical questions. The absence of human operators on board, combined with enhanced capabilities of UMVs, has the potential to reshape both the conduct of ISR operations and State responses, thereby exacerbating existing interpretative ambiguities within UNCLOS. The research is guided by the overarching question: to what extent can the strategic use of UMVs influence the interpretation and application of UNCLOS provisions regulating ISR operations? This inquiry is examined across two spatial contexts. Chapters 2 and 3 address the territorial sea. Chapter 2 outlines the principles governing ISR operations, notably the regime of innocent passage, and highlights discrepancies between established principles and emerging practice involving UMVs. Chapter 3 examines frequently advanced arguments concerning unmanned ISR activities, assessing their plausibility and impact on the interpretations of UNCLOS. Chapters 4 and 5 turn to the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Chapter 4 analyses unmanned ISR operations within the functional balance of Articles 56 and 58 of UNCLOS. Chapter 5 considers broader claims based on parallel navigational rights and the principle of peaceful use.
By combining doctrinal analysis with comparative insights from analogous regimes and jurisprudence, this study fills a scholarly gap in law of the sea literature, which has largely assumed manned operations. It further engages with pressing issues posed by unmanned ISR operations in light of technological realities. Ultimately, the thesis advances the progressive development of international law by providing an academic framework for interpreting UNCLOS in light of UMVs and offers doctrinal and practical guidance to anticipate and mitigate disputes.
UNCLOS, Unmanned maritime vehicles, ISR operations
University of Southampton
Lee, Hwon
27a9709a-29ea-411b-9249-3d6d08e8ef1e
Lee, Hwon
27a9709a-29ea-411b-9249-3d6d08e8ef1e
Ntovas, Alexandros X.M.
c770a980-34f6-4f24-8e08-eb3dae2e2bea
Serdy, Andrew
0b9326c4-8a5a-468f-9ca8-7368ccb07663
Lee, Hwon
(2026)
Reassessing coastal state rights and jurisdiction under UNCLOS: legal implications of unmanned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operations.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 189pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
This thesis examines the legality of unmanned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Although UNCLOS constitutes the fundamental legal framework of the law of the sea, it was negotiated without consideration of rapid technological advances, particularly the advent of unmanned systems. The increasing integration of unmanned maritime vehicles (UMVs) into ISR operations raises novel legal and practical questions. The absence of human operators on board, combined with enhanced capabilities of UMVs, has the potential to reshape both the conduct of ISR operations and State responses, thereby exacerbating existing interpretative ambiguities within UNCLOS. The research is guided by the overarching question: to what extent can the strategic use of UMVs influence the interpretation and application of UNCLOS provisions regulating ISR operations? This inquiry is examined across two spatial contexts. Chapters 2 and 3 address the territorial sea. Chapter 2 outlines the principles governing ISR operations, notably the regime of innocent passage, and highlights discrepancies between established principles and emerging practice involving UMVs. Chapter 3 examines frequently advanced arguments concerning unmanned ISR activities, assessing their plausibility and impact on the interpretations of UNCLOS. Chapters 4 and 5 turn to the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Chapter 4 analyses unmanned ISR operations within the functional balance of Articles 56 and 58 of UNCLOS. Chapter 5 considers broader claims based on parallel navigational rights and the principle of peaceful use.
By combining doctrinal analysis with comparative insights from analogous regimes and jurisprudence, this study fills a scholarly gap in law of the sea literature, which has largely assumed manned operations. It further engages with pressing issues posed by unmanned ISR operations in light of technological realities. Ultimately, the thesis advances the progressive development of international law by providing an academic framework for interpreting UNCLOS in light of UMVs and offers doctrinal and practical guidance to anticipate and mitigate disputes.
Text
Final thesis submission
- Version of Record
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Ms-Hwon-Lee
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Submitted date: 10 February 2026
Keywords:
UNCLOS, Unmanned maritime vehicles, ISR operations
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 509145
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509145
PURE UUID: 2119ee12-c5b2-4de9-b774-4bbaf30b5088
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Feb 2026 18:01
Last modified: 12 Feb 2026 03:10
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Hwon Lee
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics