The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparative study of common over-the-counter wound care products against early and mature biofilms of antibiotic-resistant wound pathogens

Comparative study of common over-the-counter wound care products against early and mature biofilms of antibiotic-resistant wound pathogens
Comparative study of common over-the-counter wound care products against early and mature biofilms of antibiotic-resistant wound pathogens

Background: the global rise of antimicrobial resistance requires innovative and affordable wound care solutions. Moreover, managing wounds infected with priority pathogens remains a challenge. Despite the widespread availability of over-the-counter (OTC) antiseptics in wound care, comparative studies on their efficacy against biofilms or multidrug-resistant pathogens are limited. 

Objectives: this study compares the ability of different OTC antiseptics to disrupt biofilms of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 

Methods: the antimicrobial activity of seven antiseptics (polyhexanide, octenidine, chloroxylenol, chlorhexidine, ethanol, cetrimide, phenol) against early-stage (3-hour) and mature (24-hour) biofilms was determined by measuring reductions in colony-forming units (cfu)/biofilm while varying treatment exposure time.

Results: all OTC products significantly reduced early-stage biofilms of both pathogens below detectable limits within 5 minutes (P < 0.0001, n = 3, LOD = 100 cfu/biofilm). In mature biofilms, significant differences emerged. Polyhexanide, octenidine and cetrimide yielded modest reductions in cfu count/biofilm (0.55–0.64-log) after 5 minutes, while chloroxylenol and phenol achieved ∼2.5-log reductions; notably, chlorhexidine reduced cfu/mature biofilms below detectable limits within 5 minutes. Extended exposure (60 minutes) enhanced the efficacy of phenol and ethanol, with chloroxylenol and octenidine reducing cfu/biofilm below detectable limits. Conclusion OTC antiseptics are effective in eliminating early-stage biofilms; however, mature biofilms require either prolonged exposure, which may increase their toxicity and delay wound healing, or the use of potent formulations. Chlorhexidine gluconate, chloroxylenol and phenol offer an optimal balance between antibiofilm potency and tissue safety, offering promise for acute and chronic wound management particularly in low-resource settings.

Soliman, Mohamed A.N.
18095976-6f3c-4d64-b430-3551a73a9f14
Garg, Shivanghi
b8d05c46-f174-47c8-a59a-d8f5fbf2ebc3
Harkova, Lyuboslava G.
9a8a31cf-1ced-4f40-b38a-df94e23bd767
McCarthy, Ronan R.
0b2cf2e0-b0ff-4c92-aa04-92d91182d1f2
Soliman, Mohamed A.N.
18095976-6f3c-4d64-b430-3551a73a9f14
Garg, Shivanghi
b8d05c46-f174-47c8-a59a-d8f5fbf2ebc3
Harkova, Lyuboslava G.
9a8a31cf-1ced-4f40-b38a-df94e23bd767
McCarthy, Ronan R.
0b2cf2e0-b0ff-4c92-aa04-92d91182d1f2

Soliman, Mohamed A.N., Garg, Shivanghi, Harkova, Lyuboslava G. and McCarthy, Ronan R. (2025) Comparative study of common over-the-counter wound care products against early and mature biofilms of antibiotic-resistant wound pathogens. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance, 7 (6), [dlaf233]. (doi:10.1093/jacamr/dlaf233).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the global rise of antimicrobial resistance requires innovative and affordable wound care solutions. Moreover, managing wounds infected with priority pathogens remains a challenge. Despite the widespread availability of over-the-counter (OTC) antiseptics in wound care, comparative studies on their efficacy against biofilms or multidrug-resistant pathogens are limited. 

Objectives: this study compares the ability of different OTC antiseptics to disrupt biofilms of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 

Methods: the antimicrobial activity of seven antiseptics (polyhexanide, octenidine, chloroxylenol, chlorhexidine, ethanol, cetrimide, phenol) against early-stage (3-hour) and mature (24-hour) biofilms was determined by measuring reductions in colony-forming units (cfu)/biofilm while varying treatment exposure time.

Results: all OTC products significantly reduced early-stage biofilms of both pathogens below detectable limits within 5 minutes (P < 0.0001, n = 3, LOD = 100 cfu/biofilm). In mature biofilms, significant differences emerged. Polyhexanide, octenidine and cetrimide yielded modest reductions in cfu count/biofilm (0.55–0.64-log) after 5 minutes, while chloroxylenol and phenol achieved ∼2.5-log reductions; notably, chlorhexidine reduced cfu/mature biofilms below detectable limits within 5 minutes. Extended exposure (60 minutes) enhanced the efficacy of phenol and ethanol, with chloroxylenol and octenidine reducing cfu/biofilm below detectable limits. Conclusion OTC antiseptics are effective in eliminating early-stage biofilms; however, mature biofilms require either prolonged exposure, which may increase their toxicity and delay wound healing, or the use of potent formulations. Chlorhexidine gluconate, chloroxylenol and phenol offer an optimal balance between antibiofilm potency and tissue safety, offering promise for acute and chronic wound management particularly in low-resource settings.

Text
dlaf233 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (682kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 November 2025
Published date: 16 December 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509263
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509263
PURE UUID: 71b192ac-2b29-47a1-9098-ddb26e09b530
ORCID for Mohamed A.N. Soliman: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6392-6631
ORCID for Lyuboslava G. Harkova: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0006-9442-6169
ORCID for Ronan R. McCarthy: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7480-6352

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Feb 2026 17:55
Last modified: 21 Feb 2026 03:27

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mohamed A.N. Soliman ORCID iD
Author: Shivanghi Garg
Author: Lyuboslava G. Harkova ORCID iD
Author: Ronan R. McCarthy ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×