A randomized controlled trial of exercise therapy for dizziness and vertigo in primary care
A randomized controlled trial of exercise therapy for dizziness and vertigo in primary care
Background. 'Vestibular rehabilitation' (VR) is an increasingly popular treatment option for patients with persistent dizziness. Previous clinical trials have only evaluated the effects of specialist therapy programmes in small, selective, or uncontrolled patient samples. Aim. To determine the benefits of VR compared with standard medical care, using a brief intervention for dizzy patients in primary care. Method. Adults consulting their general practitioner (GP) with dizziness or vertigo were randomly assigned to treatment or control groups. Patients in both groups received the same evaluation at baseline, six-week follow-up, and six-month follow-up, comprising examination of nystagmus, postural control, and movement-provoked dizziness, and a questionnaire assessment of subjective status, symptoms, handicap, anxiety, and depression. At baseline and six weeks later, the treatment group also received an individualized 30-minute therapy session, in which they were taught head, eye, and body exercises designed to promote vestibular compensation and enhance skill and confidence in balance. Results. The treatment group (n = 67) improved on all measures, whereas the control group (n = 76) showed no improvement, resulting in a significant difference between the two groups on physical indices of balance and subjective indices of symptoms and distress. Odds ratios for improvement in treated patients relative to untreated patients were 3.1:1 at six weeks (95% CI = 1.4-6.8) and 3.8:1 at six months (95% CI = 1.6-8.7). Conclusion. VR is a simple, inexpensive, and beneficial treatment, and may be an appropriate first stage of management for many dizzy patients in primary care.
Dizziness, Randomized controlled trial, Vertigo, Vestibular rehabilitation
1136-1140
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Beech, Sandra
9fee60fd-8648-415f-9600-fe63526a252e
Zander, Luke
8928e5d6-9247-44f0-948e-c3a662d10716
Evans, Tyrrell
669f9c5b-2431-432b-b960-1845c8ea3140
Weinman, John
d84c2633-696c-4731-b372-92a8d552276c
1 January 1998
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Beech, Sandra
9fee60fd-8648-415f-9600-fe63526a252e
Zander, Luke
8928e5d6-9247-44f0-948e-c3a662d10716
Evans, Tyrrell
669f9c5b-2431-432b-b960-1845c8ea3140
Weinman, John
d84c2633-696c-4731-b372-92a8d552276c
Yardley, Lucy, Beech, Sandra, Zander, Luke, Evans, Tyrrell and Weinman, John
(1998)
A randomized controlled trial of exercise therapy for dizziness and vertigo in primary care.
British Journal of General Practice, 48 (429), .
Abstract
Background. 'Vestibular rehabilitation' (VR) is an increasingly popular treatment option for patients with persistent dizziness. Previous clinical trials have only evaluated the effects of specialist therapy programmes in small, selective, or uncontrolled patient samples. Aim. To determine the benefits of VR compared with standard medical care, using a brief intervention for dizzy patients in primary care. Method. Adults consulting their general practitioner (GP) with dizziness or vertigo were randomly assigned to treatment or control groups. Patients in both groups received the same evaluation at baseline, six-week follow-up, and six-month follow-up, comprising examination of nystagmus, postural control, and movement-provoked dizziness, and a questionnaire assessment of subjective status, symptoms, handicap, anxiety, and depression. At baseline and six weeks later, the treatment group also received an individualized 30-minute therapy session, in which they were taught head, eye, and body exercises designed to promote vestibular compensation and enhance skill and confidence in balance. Results. The treatment group (n = 67) improved on all measures, whereas the control group (n = 76) showed no improvement, resulting in a significant difference between the two groups on physical indices of balance and subjective indices of symptoms and distress. Odds ratios for improvement in treated patients relative to untreated patients were 3.1:1 at six weeks (95% CI = 1.4-6.8) and 3.8:1 at six months (95% CI = 1.6-8.7). Conclusion. VR is a simple, inexpensive, and beneficial treatment, and may be an appropriate first stage of management for many dizzy patients in primary care.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 January 1998
Keywords:
Dizziness, Randomized controlled trial, Vertigo, Vestibular rehabilitation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 509313
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509313
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: 628d5deb-6e08-44b8-b033-61997c41e421
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Feb 2026 17:41
Last modified: 19 Feb 2026 02:35
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Sandra Beech
Author:
Luke Zander
Author:
Tyrrell Evans
Author:
John Weinman
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics