Health beliefs and preferences for medical treatment: a comparison between medical and social science students
Health beliefs and preferences for medical treatment: a comparison between medical and social science students
Objective: This study looked at the relationship between beliefs in 'scientific medicine', personal health beliefs, attitudes to complementary medical practitioners and medical treatment preferences in two different groups: medical and non-medical (mainly social science) students. It extended the previous work of looking at patient groups. Design: Once the psychometric properties of the four short questionnaires (53 items in all) were established as satisfactory in terms of their factor structure, the two groups were compared. Results: By means of analysis of variance it was established that there were fewer differences between medical and non-medical students than might be expected by chance. A 'higher order' factor analysis revealed three clear factors underlying attitudes to complementary medicine: pro complementary medicine; pro orthodox medicine; and satisfaction with general practitioner. All the students appeared to have a sceptical but positive attitude to complementary medicine.
101-109
Furnham, A.
2a6a8436-ba70-4e71-9c14-e148ff554574
Yardley, L.
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Fahmy, S.
c442bf84-d1e1-4c6a-9ac8-6ffc88737bc5
Jamie, A.
a992f421-1abf-4dc4-809c-393dd23350c0
1 January 1999
Furnham, A.
2a6a8436-ba70-4e71-9c14-e148ff554574
Yardley, L.
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Fahmy, S.
c442bf84-d1e1-4c6a-9ac8-6ffc88737bc5
Jamie, A.
a992f421-1abf-4dc4-809c-393dd23350c0
Furnham, A., Yardley, L., Fahmy, S. and Jamie, A.
(1999)
Health beliefs and preferences for medical treatment: a comparison between medical and social science students.
Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 7 (2), .
(doi:10.1016/S0965-2299(99)80088-0).
Abstract
Objective: This study looked at the relationship between beliefs in 'scientific medicine', personal health beliefs, attitudes to complementary medical practitioners and medical treatment preferences in two different groups: medical and non-medical (mainly social science) students. It extended the previous work of looking at patient groups. Design: Once the psychometric properties of the four short questionnaires (53 items in all) were established as satisfactory in terms of their factor structure, the two groups were compared. Results: By means of analysis of variance it was established that there were fewer differences between medical and non-medical students than might be expected by chance. A 'higher order' factor analysis revealed three clear factors underlying attitudes to complementary medicine: pro complementary medicine; pro orthodox medicine; and satisfaction with general practitioner. All the students appeared to have a sceptical but positive attitude to complementary medicine.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 January 1999
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 509320
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509320
ISSN: 0965-2299
PURE UUID: b45256a9-ce53-4ed9-b6b2-e5fe1af45627
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Feb 2026 17:43
Last modified: 19 Feb 2026 02:35
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
A. Furnham
Author:
S. Fahmy
Author:
A. Jamie
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics