The quest for natural communication: technology, language and deafness
The quest for natural communication: technology, language and deafness
This paper examines the 'natural/artificial' dichotomy in the context of health-related technology, illustrated here by the issue of communication with deaf people. Since representation and technology form an intrinsic part of human 'nature' and human lives, the distinction between the 'natural' and the 'artificial' is problematic if intended as a reference to specific characteristics of human bodies, capabilities or activities (e.g. the use of prostheses or sign language for communication). Instead, this dichotomy serves as a linguistic device employed in order to justify preferred ('natural/ normal/healthy') forms of life. The diverse ways in which the concept 'natural' has been linked with spoken and sign language and the use of auditory aids can hence be shown to be equivocal and contradictory; for example, promotion of spoken language as more 'natural' than sign language is associated paradoxically with the implantation in deaf children of electronic aural prostheses.
Cochlear implant, Deafness, Discourse, Medical technology, Sign language
37-55
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
1 July 1997
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Abstract
This paper examines the 'natural/artificial' dichotomy in the context of health-related technology, illustrated here by the issue of communication with deaf people. Since representation and technology form an intrinsic part of human 'nature' and human lives, the distinction between the 'natural' and the 'artificial' is problematic if intended as a reference to specific characteristics of human bodies, capabilities or activities (e.g. the use of prostheses or sign language for communication). Instead, this dichotomy serves as a linguistic device employed in order to justify preferred ('natural/ normal/healthy') forms of life. The diverse ways in which the concept 'natural' has been linked with spoken and sign language and the use of auditory aids can hence be shown to be equivocal and contradictory; for example, promotion of spoken language as more 'natural' than sign language is associated paradoxically with the implantation in deaf children of electronic aural prostheses.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 July 1997
Keywords:
Cochlear implant, Deafness, Discourse, Medical technology, Sign language
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 509365
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509365
ISSN: 1363-4593
PURE UUID: 30b4f250-503a-4d6a-846a-8d991aaa1def
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Feb 2026 17:50
Last modified: 21 Feb 2026 02:38
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics
