The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A new scoring system derived from base excess and platelet count at presentation predicts mortality in paediatric meningococcal sepsis

A new scoring system derived from base excess and platelet count at presentation predicts mortality in paediatric meningococcal sepsis
A new scoring system derived from base excess and platelet count at presentation predicts mortality in paediatric meningococcal sepsis

Introduction: the aim of this study was to derive a novel prognostic score for mortality in paediatric meningococcal sepsis (MS) based on readily available laboratory markers.

Methods: a multicentre retrospective cohort study for the consortium set and a single centre retrospective study for replication set. The consortium set were 1,073 children (age 1 week to 17.9 years) referred over a 15-year period (1996 to 2011), who had an admission diagnosis of MS, referred to paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in six different European centres. The consortium set was split into a development set and validation set to derive the score. The replication set were 134 children with MS (age 2 weeks to 16 years) referred over a 4-year period (2007 to 2011) to PICUs via the Children's Acute Transport Service (CATS), London.

Results: a total of 85/1,073 (7.9%) children in the consortium set died. A total of 16/134 (11.9%) children in the replication set died. Children dying in the consortium set had significantly lower base excess, C-reactive protein (CRP), platelet and white cell count, more deranged coagulation and higher lactate than survivors. Paediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score, Glasgow meningococcal septicaemia prognosis score (GMSPS) and Rotterdam score were also higher. Using the consortium set, a new scoring system using base excess and platelet count at presentation, termed the BEP score, was mathematically developed and validated. BEP predicted mortality with high sensitivity and specificity scores (area under the curve (AUC) in the validation set = 0.86 and in the replication set = 0.96). In the validation set, BEP score performance (AUC = 0.86, confidence interval (CI): 0.80 to 0.91) was better than GMSPS (AUC = 0.77, CI: 0.68, 0.85), similar to Rotterdam (AUC = 0.87, CI: 0.81 to 0.93) and not as good as PRISM (AUC = 0.93, CI: 0.85 to 0.97).

Conclusions: the BEP score, relying on only two variables that are quickly and objectively measurable and readily available at presentation, is highly sensitive and specific in predicting death from MS in childhood.

1364-8535
Couto-Alves, Alexessander
87b9179e-abde-4ca5-abfc-4b7c5ac8b03b
Wright, Victoria J.
f55e8d8a-82ea-4487-a13f-a857792f9262
Perumal, Karnan
e2504ec4-990a-4349-b3db-cf241a34e452
Binder, Alexander
af08439b-a2f7-453a-a802-c24053648b40
Carrol, Enitan D.
f643dc8c-745c-4919-be79-971266c9d483
Emonts, Marieke
5a700b04-6f36-4fbe-bd2c-5d046704f018
de Groot, Ronald
d9b71914-7f52-4971-8a8b-69458d99bdf1
Hazelzet, Jan
4074a0d6-2090-44a0-9dd6-5d3516d311a8
Kuijpers, Taco
e96daf65-9de2-4f01-b498-4530f3a14b8c
Nadel, Simon
f1c915fe-d1bc-4c6e-801f-6b6f2afdbe31
Zenz, Werner
be42c131-ad28-42f8-bc7e-ac3fbe14b5b3
Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan
e37f4786-cce0-4505-a714-381b46e54744
Levin, Michael
6d5972ec-9c46-4603-b7e0-c811137f69ed
Coin, Lachlan
ff460121-4ac3-40f0-8f72-546ac0485023
Inwald, David P.
c8fca43c-ff9f-43c7-9d4c-dfb8afd946f0
Couto-Alves, Alexessander
87b9179e-abde-4ca5-abfc-4b7c5ac8b03b
Wright, Victoria J.
f55e8d8a-82ea-4487-a13f-a857792f9262
Perumal, Karnan
e2504ec4-990a-4349-b3db-cf241a34e452
Binder, Alexander
af08439b-a2f7-453a-a802-c24053648b40
Carrol, Enitan D.
f643dc8c-745c-4919-be79-971266c9d483
Emonts, Marieke
5a700b04-6f36-4fbe-bd2c-5d046704f018
de Groot, Ronald
d9b71914-7f52-4971-8a8b-69458d99bdf1
Hazelzet, Jan
4074a0d6-2090-44a0-9dd6-5d3516d311a8
Kuijpers, Taco
e96daf65-9de2-4f01-b498-4530f3a14b8c
Nadel, Simon
f1c915fe-d1bc-4c6e-801f-6b6f2afdbe31
Zenz, Werner
be42c131-ad28-42f8-bc7e-ac3fbe14b5b3
Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan
e37f4786-cce0-4505-a714-381b46e54744
Levin, Michael
6d5972ec-9c46-4603-b7e0-c811137f69ed
Coin, Lachlan
ff460121-4ac3-40f0-8f72-546ac0485023
Inwald, David P.
c8fca43c-ff9f-43c7-9d4c-dfb8afd946f0

Couto-Alves, Alexessander, Wright, Victoria J., Perumal, Karnan, Binder, Alexander, Carrol, Enitan D., Emonts, Marieke, de Groot, Ronald, Hazelzet, Jan, Kuijpers, Taco, Nadel, Simon, Zenz, Werner, Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan, Levin, Michael, Coin, Lachlan and Inwald, David P. (2013) A new scoring system derived from base excess and platelet count at presentation predicts mortality in paediatric meningococcal sepsis. Critical Care, 17 (2), [R68]. (doi:10.1186/cc12609).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: the aim of this study was to derive a novel prognostic score for mortality in paediatric meningococcal sepsis (MS) based on readily available laboratory markers.

Methods: a multicentre retrospective cohort study for the consortium set and a single centre retrospective study for replication set. The consortium set were 1,073 children (age 1 week to 17.9 years) referred over a 15-year period (1996 to 2011), who had an admission diagnosis of MS, referred to paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in six different European centres. The consortium set was split into a development set and validation set to derive the score. The replication set were 134 children with MS (age 2 weeks to 16 years) referred over a 4-year period (2007 to 2011) to PICUs via the Children's Acute Transport Service (CATS), London.

Results: a total of 85/1,073 (7.9%) children in the consortium set died. A total of 16/134 (11.9%) children in the replication set died. Children dying in the consortium set had significantly lower base excess, C-reactive protein (CRP), platelet and white cell count, more deranged coagulation and higher lactate than survivors. Paediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score, Glasgow meningococcal septicaemia prognosis score (GMSPS) and Rotterdam score were also higher. Using the consortium set, a new scoring system using base excess and platelet count at presentation, termed the BEP score, was mathematically developed and validated. BEP predicted mortality with high sensitivity and specificity scores (area under the curve (AUC) in the validation set = 0.86 and in the replication set = 0.96). In the validation set, BEP score performance (AUC = 0.86, confidence interval (CI): 0.80 to 0.91) was better than GMSPS (AUC = 0.77, CI: 0.68, 0.85), similar to Rotterdam (AUC = 0.87, CI: 0.81 to 0.93) and not as good as PRISM (AUC = 0.93, CI: 0.85 to 0.97).

Conclusions: the BEP score, relying on only two variables that are quickly and objectively measurable and readily available at presentation, is highly sensitive and specific in predicting death from MS in childhood.

Text
cc12609 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (724kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 3 April 2013
Published date: 11 April 2013

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509397
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509397
ISSN: 1364-8535
PURE UUID: 5de5a2bc-6697-4749-b7c5-f33f07854659
ORCID for Alexessander Couto-Alves: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8519-7356

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Feb 2026 17:35
Last modified: 21 Feb 2026 03:20

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alexessander Couto-Alves ORCID iD
Author: Victoria J. Wright
Author: Karnan Perumal
Author: Alexander Binder
Author: Enitan D. Carrol
Author: Marieke Emonts
Author: Ronald de Groot
Author: Jan Hazelzet
Author: Taco Kuijpers
Author: Simon Nadel
Author: Werner Zenz
Author: Padmanabhan Ramnarayan
Author: Michael Levin
Author: Lachlan Coin
Author: David P. Inwald

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×