The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Establishing Appropriate Test Protocols for Biomimetic Facet Joint Implants as a Basis for Test Rig Development

Establishing Appropriate Test Protocols for Biomimetic Facet Joint Implants as a Basis for Test Rig Development
Establishing Appropriate Test Protocols for Biomimetic Facet Joint Implants as a Basis for Test Rig Development
Chronic low back pain affects a significant proportion of the global population, costs health services large amounts of money, and often treatment is ineffective in the long term. For some patients, this pain originates from nerve compression as a result of de¬generative changes associated with facet joint osteoarthritis (FJOA). Non-surgical treat¬ments for FJOA are commonly not effective in the long term and surgical treatments like total joint replacement are very invasive, increasing the likelihood of complications and prohibiting future joint treatment options. Particularly for the young, there exists a therapeutic gap. Minimally invasive intra-facet implants, which sit within the facet joints, are a promising solution, offering the long term relief of a mechanical solution with reduced complication rates, but the limited number of existing solutions of this kind are not widely in clinical use. The lack of a standard way of testing these novel devices impedes their development. Current testing platforms focus on assessing the integrity of an implant under mechanical loading and lack the fidelity to assess the performance and efficacy of novel intra-facet implants. Completely synthetic lumbar spine sections are emerging, but their focus is on simulating the gross mechanics of the spine (i.e. range of motion and stiffness) and do not simulate the complex tribological environment of the joint which is significant because unfavourable transient tribological states may be a key initiator and driver of osteoarthritis. For rigorous testing of intra-facet implants, a testing platform which appropriately simulates the gross biomechanics of the spine as well as the tribological environment of the facet joints is paramount. This is particularly true for future generations of minimally invasive implants.

This research focusses on the development of tests which recreate the low-friction movement that exits in the joints, before being scaled up to an appropriate geometrical model. The friction coefficient of a biomedical tribological system is one of the critical properties determining its performance, with high static friction having previously been related to articular cartilage damage ex vivo. To this end, a test method for measuring the friction coefficient between two reciprocating lubricated polymer sheets was devised in this study. A silicone lubricant of viscosity 350cP, was placed between the surfaces and start-stop dwell time experiments were run with dwell periods of 15, 40, 70, 140, and 310 seconds under a 0.5 MPa contact pressure, 2.7 mm/s relative sliding speed, and lubricant temperature of 28°C. Steady-state friction coefficients of 0.03 or less were achieved, along with predictable stiction friction profiles. The biggest barrier to further progress in the development of a synthetic joint is the lack of a method for measuring the friction coefficient between artificial cartilage surfaces in situ. The author proposes some incremental experiments as a way to gain further insight until such a method is devised.
University of Southampton
Gatehouse, Paul Michael Wallace
1e923c11-85c6-4f38-9b7e-6abcc1a30d4e
Gatehouse, Paul Michael Wallace
1e923c11-85c6-4f38-9b7e-6abcc1a30d4e
Browne, Martin
6578cc37-7bd6-43b9-ae5c-77ccb7726397
Taylor, Andrew
dd713dc1-7bd3-40a0-b645-83397c61dcf5
Burson-Thomas, Charles
2bacf260-3637-4943-9816-3d8f18c24eb7

Gatehouse, Paul Michael Wallace (2026) Establishing Appropriate Test Protocols for Biomimetic Facet Joint Implants as a Basis for Test Rig Development. University of Southampton, Masters Thesis, 134pp.

Record type: Thesis (Masters)

Abstract

Chronic low back pain affects a significant proportion of the global population, costs health services large amounts of money, and often treatment is ineffective in the long term. For some patients, this pain originates from nerve compression as a result of de¬generative changes associated with facet joint osteoarthritis (FJOA). Non-surgical treat¬ments for FJOA are commonly not effective in the long term and surgical treatments like total joint replacement are very invasive, increasing the likelihood of complications and prohibiting future joint treatment options. Particularly for the young, there exists a therapeutic gap. Minimally invasive intra-facet implants, which sit within the facet joints, are a promising solution, offering the long term relief of a mechanical solution with reduced complication rates, but the limited number of existing solutions of this kind are not widely in clinical use. The lack of a standard way of testing these novel devices impedes their development. Current testing platforms focus on assessing the integrity of an implant under mechanical loading and lack the fidelity to assess the performance and efficacy of novel intra-facet implants. Completely synthetic lumbar spine sections are emerging, but their focus is on simulating the gross mechanics of the spine (i.e. range of motion and stiffness) and do not simulate the complex tribological environment of the joint which is significant because unfavourable transient tribological states may be a key initiator and driver of osteoarthritis. For rigorous testing of intra-facet implants, a testing platform which appropriately simulates the gross biomechanics of the spine as well as the tribological environment of the facet joints is paramount. This is particularly true for future generations of minimally invasive implants.

This research focusses on the development of tests which recreate the low-friction movement that exits in the joints, before being scaled up to an appropriate geometrical model. The friction coefficient of a biomedical tribological system is one of the critical properties determining its performance, with high static friction having previously been related to articular cartilage damage ex vivo. To this end, a test method for measuring the friction coefficient between two reciprocating lubricated polymer sheets was devised in this study. A silicone lubricant of viscosity 350cP, was placed between the surfaces and start-stop dwell time experiments were run with dwell periods of 15, 40, 70, 140, and 310 seconds under a 0.5 MPa contact pressure, 2.7 mm/s relative sliding speed, and lubricant temperature of 28°C. Steady-state friction coefficients of 0.03 or less were achieved, along with predictable stiction friction profiles. The biggest barrier to further progress in the development of a synthetic joint is the lack of a method for measuring the friction coefficient between artificial cartilage surfaces in situ. The author proposes some incremental experiments as a way to gain further insight until such a method is devised.

Text
PG_MPhil Thesis_Corrected_FINAL_A3_STANDARD - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only until 13 February 2029.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mr-Paul-Gatehouse
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: February 2026

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509474
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509474
PURE UUID: a84f2b01-359f-4895-bc11-dbb2bca311d8
ORCID for Paul Michael Wallace Gatehouse: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0009-0191-5556
ORCID for Martin Browne: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5184-050X
ORCID for Charles Burson-Thomas: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9308-4669

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Feb 2026 17:37
Last modified: 06 Mar 2026 03:27

Export record

Contributors

Author: Paul Michael Wallace Gatehouse ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Martin Browne ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Andrew Taylor
Thesis advisor: Charles Burson-Thomas ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×