The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Examining the factors that influence selection choices within interactive search

Examining the factors that influence selection choices within interactive search
Examining the factors that influence selection choices within interactive search
Historically, human search behaviours have been studied through experimentation using static two-dimensional displays. In these experiments, searchers are tasked with finding target object(s) within visual scenes or amongst stationary distractor objects. However, the vast quantity of theoretical models and research findings fashioned from this approach have one crucial limitation; they overlook the role of physical interactions. The central purpose of this thesis was to address this missing link by conducting search experiments that were interactive in nature. Specifically, these experiments focused upon the factors that drive cognitive decisions regarding which objects or areas to interact with, and how exhaustively to search these before termination. The first set of experiments, presented within Chapter 2, investigated the role of the low prevalence effect within interactive search; a robust effect within visual search by which rare targets are often missed by the searcher. Results revealed standard low prevalence effects upon response accuracy. However, in contrast to visual search, this was not a result of reductions in search exhaustiveness. The second set of experiments, presented within Chapter 3, examined the role of effort on interaction choices. The results confirmed effort to be an extremely strong driver of attentional selection but also highlighted that searchers were often unwilling to terminate a search before having checked and revealed all possible visual information within the display. The final set of experiments, presented In Chapter 4, investigated the important confound of time within interactive search. In the prior experiments, it was unclear whether selection biases were a result of the increased time taken to interact with high effort objects. The findings confirmed that whilst effort was the primary cause, time should not be overlooked within interactive search. Furthermore, results again confirmed that participants were unwilling to leave visual information unchecked within trials. Overall, this thesis and the combined results highlight that the behaviours conducted during visual search are not a good approximation of those conducted during interactive search. Primarily, interactive search tasks are conducted more exhaustively than their visual search counterparts and interaction choices are heavily influenced by the effort and time required to interact with objects.
University of Southampton
Dewis, Haden Samuel David
8bfc20ea-9a60-48f6-bb25-00c4d4252a84
Dewis, Haden Samuel David
8bfc20ea-9a60-48f6-bb25-00c4d4252a84
Godwin, Hayward
df22dc0c-01d1-440a-a369-a763801851e5
Metcalf, Cheryl
09a47264-8bd5-43bd-a93e-177992c22c72
Warner, Martin
f4dce73d-fb87-4f71-a3f0-078123aa040c

Dewis, Haden Samuel David (2026) Examining the factors that influence selection choices within interactive search. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 187pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Historically, human search behaviours have been studied through experimentation using static two-dimensional displays. In these experiments, searchers are tasked with finding target object(s) within visual scenes or amongst stationary distractor objects. However, the vast quantity of theoretical models and research findings fashioned from this approach have one crucial limitation; they overlook the role of physical interactions. The central purpose of this thesis was to address this missing link by conducting search experiments that were interactive in nature. Specifically, these experiments focused upon the factors that drive cognitive decisions regarding which objects or areas to interact with, and how exhaustively to search these before termination. The first set of experiments, presented within Chapter 2, investigated the role of the low prevalence effect within interactive search; a robust effect within visual search by which rare targets are often missed by the searcher. Results revealed standard low prevalence effects upon response accuracy. However, in contrast to visual search, this was not a result of reductions in search exhaustiveness. The second set of experiments, presented within Chapter 3, examined the role of effort on interaction choices. The results confirmed effort to be an extremely strong driver of attentional selection but also highlighted that searchers were often unwilling to terminate a search before having checked and revealed all possible visual information within the display. The final set of experiments, presented In Chapter 4, investigated the important confound of time within interactive search. In the prior experiments, it was unclear whether selection biases were a result of the increased time taken to interact with high effort objects. The findings confirmed that whilst effort was the primary cause, time should not be overlooked within interactive search. Furthermore, results again confirmed that participants were unwilling to leave visual information unchecked within trials. Overall, this thesis and the combined results highlight that the behaviours conducted during visual search are not a good approximation of those conducted during interactive search. Primarily, interactive search tasks are conducted more exhaustively than their visual search counterparts and interaction choices are heavily influenced by the effort and time required to interact with objects.

Text
Haden Dewis PhD Thesis Final 2026 (PDF A) - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (4MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mr-Haden-Dewis
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Submitted date: October 2025
Published date: 2026

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509479
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509479
PURE UUID: 5acbd73f-c5d7-45a1-9b87-7c7f1d9dc5ff
ORCID for Hayward Godwin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0005-1232-500X
ORCID for Cheryl Metcalf: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7404-6066
ORCID for Martin Warner: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-0561

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Feb 2026 17:42
Last modified: 06 Mar 2026 02:53

Export record

Contributors

Author: Haden Samuel David Dewis
Thesis advisor: Hayward Godwin ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Cheryl Metcalf ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Martin Warner ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×