Save bees, plant trees, shoot refugees: the ascendent terror of far-right ecologism and ecofascism
Save bees, plant trees, shoot refugees: the ascendent terror of far-right ecologism and ecofascism
My own work sits at the nexus of the climate and ecological crises and antiblackness. There is ample scientific literature examining how these crises catalyse environmental discourse across political ideologies. While environmentalism has been traditionally associated with progressive movements, far-right actors are increasingly adopting green rhetoric. This shift gives rise to ecofascism, an ideological fusion of environmental concerns with authoritarianism, racism, antisemitism, and nationalism. In this paper, I synthesise narratives across the conceptual terrain, contrasting the narrow framing of ecofascism with Balša Lubarda’s (2020) preferred term far-right ecologism (FRE) to highlight political risks. As Macklin (2022) shows, far-right actors now engage with climate change in violent, racist, and apocalyptic ways. Ecofascism is not an anomaly but part of a historical continuity of racialised, reactionary politics. While mainstream right-wing politics may still deny climate change, the extreme right promotes a blood-and-soil environmentalism rooted in Nazi ideology. The crux I argue, is that ecofascism is now part of a historical continuity of reactionary politics responding opportunistically to the ecological crisis.
Lomotey, Michael
ddecca4b-d332-45f7-ab1b-d256a7572978
2 July 2025
Lomotey, Michael
ddecca4b-d332-45f7-ab1b-d256a7572978
Lomotey, Michael
(2025)
Save bees, plant trees, shoot refugees: the ascendent terror of far-right ecologism and ecofascism.
Doing Ethnography in Political Contexts or Doing Politics via Ethnography?, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
02 - 03 Jul 2025.
4 pp
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
My own work sits at the nexus of the climate and ecological crises and antiblackness. There is ample scientific literature examining how these crises catalyse environmental discourse across political ideologies. While environmentalism has been traditionally associated with progressive movements, far-right actors are increasingly adopting green rhetoric. This shift gives rise to ecofascism, an ideological fusion of environmental concerns with authoritarianism, racism, antisemitism, and nationalism. In this paper, I synthesise narratives across the conceptual terrain, contrasting the narrow framing of ecofascism with Balša Lubarda’s (2020) preferred term far-right ecologism (FRE) to highlight political risks. As Macklin (2022) shows, far-right actors now engage with climate change in violent, racist, and apocalyptic ways. Ecofascism is not an anomaly but part of a historical continuity of racialised, reactionary politics. While mainstream right-wing politics may still deny climate change, the extreme right promotes a blood-and-soil environmentalism rooted in Nazi ideology. The crux I argue, is that ecofascism is now part of a historical continuity of reactionary politics responding opportunistically to the ecological crisis.
Text
Save bees plant trees shoot refugees - Michael Lomotey paper
- Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 2 July 2025
Venue - Dates:
Doing Ethnography in Political Contexts or Doing Politics via Ethnography?, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, 2025-07-02 - 2025-07-03
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 509517
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509517
PURE UUID: b567f751-0f8e-415b-ada9-9aa381d688ba
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Feb 2026 17:56
Last modified: 25 Feb 2026 03:05
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Michael Lomotey
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics