Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in a UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a two-factor model
Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in a UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a two-factor model
Background: the underrepresentation of women in academic medicine at senior level and in leadership positions is well documented. Biomedical Research Centres (BRC), partnerships between leading National Health Service (NHS) organisations and universities, conduct world class translational research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) in the UK. Since 2011 BRCs are required to demonstrate significant progress in gender equity (GE) to be eligible to apply for funding. However, the evidence base for monitoring GE specifically in BRC settings is underdeveloped. This is the first survey tool designed to rank and identify new GE markers specific to the NIHR BRCs.
Methods: an online survey distributed to senior leadership, clinical and non-clinical researchers, trainees, administrative and other professionals affiliated to the NIHR Oxford BRC (N = 683). Participants ranked 13 markers of GE on a five point Likert scale by importance. Data were summarised using frequencies and descriptive statistics. Interrelationships between markers and underlying latent dimensions (factors) were determined by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
Results: the response rate was 36% (243 respondents). Respondents were more frequently female (55%, n = 133), aged 41–50 years (33%, n = 81), investigators (33%, n = 81) affiliated to the BRC for 2–7 years (39.5%, n = 96). Overall participants ranked ‘BRC senior leadership roles’ and ‘organisational policies on gender equity’, to be the most important markers of GE. 58% (n = 141) and 57% (n = 139) respectively. Female participants ranked ‘organisational policies’ (64.7%, n = 86/133) and ‘recruitment and retention’ (60.9%, n = 81/133) most highly, whereas male participants ranked ‘leadership development’ (52.1%, n = 50/96) and ‘BRC senior leadership roles’ (50%, n = 48/96) as most important. Factor analyses identified two distinct latent dimensions: “organisational markers” and “individual markers” of GE in BRCs.
Conclusions: a two-factor model of markers of achievement for GE with “organisational” and “individual” dimensions was identified. Implementation and sustainability of gender equity requires commitment at senior leadership and organisational policy level.
Henderson, Lorna R.
63498574-d67a-491b-86d6-aada82e2a0b0
Shah, Syed Ghulam Sarwar
d8494624-aacf-44b7-8581-154b7004290c
Ovseiko, Pavel V.
0d3ff74e-2e70-4651-b795-4a9e7d5a2d2f
Dam, Rinita
d4d3739f-ce86-4dc9-b5cf-7e23ec52396f
Buchan, Alastair M.
43231f9f-6d05-4d4c-b55c-0827082a0e86
McShane, Helen
7ab127eb-ad30-4704-a459-00b3b17c7bad
Kiparoglou, Vasiliki
e75b0833-3edd-482d-80f7-c1b12cca6a54
Sudzina, Frantisek
938cb95d-a9cc-4f4d-954c-b05afa57813a
14 October 2020
Henderson, Lorna R.
63498574-d67a-491b-86d6-aada82e2a0b0
Sudzina, Frantisek
938cb95d-a9cc-4f4d-954c-b05afa57813a
Shah, Syed Ghulam Sarwar
d8494624-aacf-44b7-8581-154b7004290c
Ovseiko, Pavel V.
0d3ff74e-2e70-4651-b795-4a9e7d5a2d2f
Dam, Rinita
d4d3739f-ce86-4dc9-b5cf-7e23ec52396f
Buchan, Alastair M.
43231f9f-6d05-4d4c-b55c-0827082a0e86
McShane, Helen
7ab127eb-ad30-4704-a459-00b3b17c7bad
Kiparoglou, Vasiliki
e75b0833-3edd-482d-80f7-c1b12cca6a54
Henderson, Lorna R., Shah, Syed Ghulam Sarwar, Ovseiko, Pavel V., Dam, Rinita, Buchan, Alastair M., McShane, Helen and Kiparoglou, Vasiliki
,
Sudzina, Frantisek
(ed.)
(2020)
Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in a UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a two-factor model.
PLoS ONE, 15 (10), [e0239589].
(doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239589).
Abstract
Background: the underrepresentation of women in academic medicine at senior level and in leadership positions is well documented. Biomedical Research Centres (BRC), partnerships between leading National Health Service (NHS) organisations and universities, conduct world class translational research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) in the UK. Since 2011 BRCs are required to demonstrate significant progress in gender equity (GE) to be eligible to apply for funding. However, the evidence base for monitoring GE specifically in BRC settings is underdeveloped. This is the first survey tool designed to rank and identify new GE markers specific to the NIHR BRCs.
Methods: an online survey distributed to senior leadership, clinical and non-clinical researchers, trainees, administrative and other professionals affiliated to the NIHR Oxford BRC (N = 683). Participants ranked 13 markers of GE on a five point Likert scale by importance. Data were summarised using frequencies and descriptive statistics. Interrelationships between markers and underlying latent dimensions (factors) were determined by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
Results: the response rate was 36% (243 respondents). Respondents were more frequently female (55%, n = 133), aged 41–50 years (33%, n = 81), investigators (33%, n = 81) affiliated to the BRC for 2–7 years (39.5%, n = 96). Overall participants ranked ‘BRC senior leadership roles’ and ‘organisational policies on gender equity’, to be the most important markers of GE. 58% (n = 141) and 57% (n = 139) respectively. Female participants ranked ‘organisational policies’ (64.7%, n = 86/133) and ‘recruitment and retention’ (60.9%, n = 81/133) most highly, whereas male participants ranked ‘leadership development’ (52.1%, n = 50/96) and ‘BRC senior leadership roles’ (50%, n = 48/96) as most important. Factor analyses identified two distinct latent dimensions: “organisational markers” and “individual markers” of GE in BRCs.
Conclusions: a two-factor model of markers of achievement for GE with “organisational” and “individual” dimensions was identified. Implementation and sustainability of gender equity requires commitment at senior leadership and organisational policy level.
Text
file (18)
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 September 2020
Published date: 14 October 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 509522
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509522
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: e8d218d1-9e22-4105-9fcb-9ba60b09b3a9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Feb 2026 17:31
Last modified: 26 Feb 2026 03:16
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Lorna R. Henderson
Editor:
Frantisek Sudzina
Author:
Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah
Author:
Pavel V. Ovseiko
Author:
Rinita Dam
Author:
Alastair M. Buchan
Author:
Helen McShane
Author:
Vasiliki Kiparoglou
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics