The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How do primary care consultation dynamics affect the timeliness of cancer diagnosis in people with one or more long-term conditions? A qualitative study

How do primary care consultation dynamics affect the timeliness of cancer diagnosis in people with one or more long-term conditions? A qualitative study
How do primary care consultation dynamics affect the timeliness of cancer diagnosis in people with one or more long-term conditions? A qualitative study

Objectives To explore how pre-existing conditions affect the diagnostic process for potential cancer in primary care patients. Design Qualitative interview study using thematic analysis underpinned by a critical realist approach. Setting Primary care practices recruited through four Clinical Research Networks and UK health charities across England. Participants Interviews were conducted with 75 patients with one or more pre-existing conditions (anxiety/depression, diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Parkinson’s disease or multiple long-term conditions (four or more)) and 28 primary care professionals (general practitioners and nurses). Results The study identified legitimacy as a central theme influencing patient trajectories in the health system while trying to receive a diagnosis for symptoms with which they presented to primary care. Patients engaged in self-triage to determine whether symptoms were ‘legitimate’ enough to seek care. Subsequent triaging steps (by receptionists, nurses and online systems) acted as gatekeepers, with decisions influenced by effectiveness of describing the symptom and subjective impressions. During consultations, clinicians relied on a mix of symptom narrative clarity, medical history and objective ‘metrics’ (eg, blood results, family history) to determine legitimacy for further investigations. Pre-existing conditions could either lower the threshold for referrals or obscure potential cancer symptoms. The stigma associated with mental health diagnoses often undermined perceived legitimacy and contributed to delays. Conclusions Legitimacy is continuously negotiated throughout the diagnostic pathway. It is shaped by social, moral and biomedical judgements. To promote early cancer diagnosis for patients with pre-existing conditions, clinicians must make legitimacy assessments explicit, reduce stigma especially around mental health and standardise triage processes.

Chronic Disease, Decision Making, Early Detection of Cancer, Primary Care, QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
2044-6055
Valasaki, Maria
8cbf2d4e-3ecc-475d-a2f9-b5a8f9644a03
Carter, Mary
9452e74f-51df-4204-82cb-9cee8e74f7a8
Winder, Rachel
a186785d-78f1-4c0d-9295-f7fb4a4ce2df
Shephard, Elizabeth
fe77e2bc-ba7c-4f7f-9d2f-29b49f7eb006
Valderas, Jose M
486297b3-c041-4a3d-bc4f-3848a8d8e7e3
Merriel, Samuel William David
62128a29-0b12-48ea-b7f6-ca1af5c8b5f7
Farmer, Leon
80aa6454-0e56-4dc4-a906-f452445235b9
Summers, Beccy
e34bb612-379b-4d7e-bf4d-accac194bffe
Dean, Sarah Gerard
7b877961-d5e2-417f-a60a-5dd4b3979ac4
Morgan-Trimmer, Sarah
54b8eda7-d5da-4287-815c-3e0bd00f5364
Valasaki, Maria
8cbf2d4e-3ecc-475d-a2f9-b5a8f9644a03
Carter, Mary
9452e74f-51df-4204-82cb-9cee8e74f7a8
Winder, Rachel
a186785d-78f1-4c0d-9295-f7fb4a4ce2df
Shephard, Elizabeth
fe77e2bc-ba7c-4f7f-9d2f-29b49f7eb006
Valderas, Jose M
486297b3-c041-4a3d-bc4f-3848a8d8e7e3
Merriel, Samuel William David
62128a29-0b12-48ea-b7f6-ca1af5c8b5f7
Farmer, Leon
80aa6454-0e56-4dc4-a906-f452445235b9
Summers, Beccy
e34bb612-379b-4d7e-bf4d-accac194bffe
Dean, Sarah Gerard
7b877961-d5e2-417f-a60a-5dd4b3979ac4
Morgan-Trimmer, Sarah
54b8eda7-d5da-4287-815c-3e0bd00f5364

Valasaki, Maria, Carter, Mary, Winder, Rachel, Shephard, Elizabeth, Valderas, Jose M, Merriel, Samuel William David, Farmer, Leon, Summers, Beccy, Dean, Sarah Gerard and Morgan-Trimmer, Sarah (2025) How do primary care consultation dynamics affect the timeliness of cancer diagnosis in people with one or more long-term conditions? A qualitative study. BMJ Open, 15 (9), [e103288]. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103288).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives To explore how pre-existing conditions affect the diagnostic process for potential cancer in primary care patients. Design Qualitative interview study using thematic analysis underpinned by a critical realist approach. Setting Primary care practices recruited through four Clinical Research Networks and UK health charities across England. Participants Interviews were conducted with 75 patients with one or more pre-existing conditions (anxiety/depression, diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Parkinson’s disease or multiple long-term conditions (four or more)) and 28 primary care professionals (general practitioners and nurses). Results The study identified legitimacy as a central theme influencing patient trajectories in the health system while trying to receive a diagnosis for symptoms with which they presented to primary care. Patients engaged in self-triage to determine whether symptoms were ‘legitimate’ enough to seek care. Subsequent triaging steps (by receptionists, nurses and online systems) acted as gatekeepers, with decisions influenced by effectiveness of describing the symptom and subjective impressions. During consultations, clinicians relied on a mix of symptom narrative clarity, medical history and objective ‘metrics’ (eg, blood results, family history) to determine legitimacy for further investigations. Pre-existing conditions could either lower the threshold for referrals or obscure potential cancer symptoms. The stigma associated with mental health diagnoses often undermined perceived legitimacy and contributed to delays. Conclusions Legitimacy is continuously negotiated throughout the diagnostic pathway. It is shaped by social, moral and biomedical judgements. To promote early cancer diagnosis for patients with pre-existing conditions, clinicians must make legitimacy assessments explicit, reduce stigma especially around mental health and standardise triage processes.

Text
e103288.full - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (418kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 September 2025
Published date: 28 September 2025
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group.
Keywords: Chronic Disease, Decision Making, Early Detection of Cancer, Primary Care, QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509567
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509567
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: c0985915-9037-4472-8401-120e51388e83
ORCID for Sarah Morgan-Trimmer: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5226-9595

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Feb 2026 17:52
Last modified: 07 Mar 2026 04:26

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Maria Valasaki
Author: Mary Carter
Author: Rachel Winder
Author: Elizabeth Shephard
Author: Jose M Valderas
Author: Samuel William David Merriel
Author: Leon Farmer
Author: Beccy Summers
Author: Sarah Gerard Dean
Author: Sarah Morgan-Trimmer ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×