The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

What incentives encourage local communities to collect and upload mosquito sound data by using smartphones? A case study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

What incentives encourage local communities to collect and upload mosquito sound data by using smartphones? A case study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
What incentives encourage local communities to collect and upload mosquito sound data by using smartphones? A case study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Malaria is one of the deadliest vector borne diseases effecting sub-Saharan Africa. A suite of systems are being used to monitor and manage malaria risk and disease incidence, with an increasing focus on technological interventions that allow private citizens to remotely record and upload data. However, data collected by citizen scientists must be standardised and consistent if it is to be used for scientific analysis. Studies that aim to improve data collection quality and quantity have often included incentivisation, providing citizen scientists with monetary or other benefits for their participation in data collection. We tested whether monetary incentives enhance participation and data collection in a study trialling an acoustic mosquito sensor. Working with the community in two health districts in the Democratic Republic of Congo, we measured data collection participation, completeness, and community responses. Our results showed mixed responses to the incentive, with more participants interested in the social status and monetary value of the technology used than the monetary incentive itself. The effect of incentives on data collection varied over the course of the trial, increasing participation in the start of the trial but with no effect in the latter half of the trial. Feedback from participants showed that opinions on technology, research objectives, and incentives varied between communities, and was associated with differences in data collection quantity and quality, suggesting that differences in community interest in data collection and the incentives may be more important than the incentive value itself. These results suggest that though there is an initial benefit, extrinsic motivations do not override differences in intrinsic motivations over time, and enhanced communication and dialogue with participants may improve citizen science participation and attitudes.
medRxiv
Storer, Kieran E.
08fb913e-082d-4f91-9501-685ad94d4e50
Messina, Jane P.
d7056ef3-752d-48df-8907-2161e498b47c
Herreros-Moya, Eva
802817b7-25db-4868-94c4-b06533473751
Metelo, Emery
7d5a26d7-cff7-4c80-8547-86a5d5719382
Zanga, Josué
cc9ceb55-eef2-4ded-a0f1-c5532be063ec
Mvuama, Nono M.
8d40f781-a5a8-4eef-9035-3012be4e1ff6
Muzinga, Soleil
028ca1b6-0cb2-4dc3-8f4e-ae2a74272141
Dam, Rinita
d4d3739f-ce86-4dc9-b5cf-7e23ec52396f
Sinka, Marianne
4f68b602-3d31-4054-8ac7-b49fc9715288
Kiskin, Ivan
d54ce808-0cfa-44f1-a879-fa9b6f6d2600
Everett, Josh
b732a8b9-9dbd-4d34-a1df-83c3aafb7bf1
Li, Yunpeng
9ef7dc77-8105-4717-baaa-daa3c91b92d3
Roberts, Stephen
9d6cb0cd-ca31-4057-a9d7-feb753878add
Willis, Katherine J.
7ab089d1-4fd6-40aa-90d8-b55bf5ab0edb
Storer, Kieran E.
08fb913e-082d-4f91-9501-685ad94d4e50
Messina, Jane P.
d7056ef3-752d-48df-8907-2161e498b47c
Herreros-Moya, Eva
802817b7-25db-4868-94c4-b06533473751
Metelo, Emery
7d5a26d7-cff7-4c80-8547-86a5d5719382
Zanga, Josué
cc9ceb55-eef2-4ded-a0f1-c5532be063ec
Mvuama, Nono M.
8d40f781-a5a8-4eef-9035-3012be4e1ff6
Muzinga, Soleil
028ca1b6-0cb2-4dc3-8f4e-ae2a74272141
Dam, Rinita
d4d3739f-ce86-4dc9-b5cf-7e23ec52396f
Sinka, Marianne
4f68b602-3d31-4054-8ac7-b49fc9715288
Kiskin, Ivan
d54ce808-0cfa-44f1-a879-fa9b6f6d2600
Everett, Josh
b732a8b9-9dbd-4d34-a1df-83c3aafb7bf1
Li, Yunpeng
9ef7dc77-8105-4717-baaa-daa3c91b92d3
Roberts, Stephen
9d6cb0cd-ca31-4057-a9d7-feb753878add
Willis, Katherine J.
7ab089d1-4fd6-40aa-90d8-b55bf5ab0edb

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Malaria is one of the deadliest vector borne diseases effecting sub-Saharan Africa. A suite of systems are being used to monitor and manage malaria risk and disease incidence, with an increasing focus on technological interventions that allow private citizens to remotely record and upload data. However, data collected by citizen scientists must be standardised and consistent if it is to be used for scientific analysis. Studies that aim to improve data collection quality and quantity have often included incentivisation, providing citizen scientists with monetary or other benefits for their participation in data collection. We tested whether monetary incentives enhance participation and data collection in a study trialling an acoustic mosquito sensor. Working with the community in two health districts in the Democratic Republic of Congo, we measured data collection participation, completeness, and community responses. Our results showed mixed responses to the incentive, with more participants interested in the social status and monetary value of the technology used than the monetary incentive itself. The effect of incentives on data collection varied over the course of the trial, increasing participation in the start of the trial but with no effect in the latter half of the trial. Feedback from participants showed that opinions on technology, research objectives, and incentives varied between communities, and was associated with differences in data collection quantity and quality, suggesting that differences in community interest in data collection and the incentives may be more important than the incentive value itself. These results suggest that though there is an initial benefit, extrinsic motivations do not override differences in intrinsic motivations over time, and enhanced communication and dialogue with participants may improve citizen science participation and attitudes.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 12 November 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509608
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509608
PURE UUID: b0917ed8-4ca0-497d-90e3-7741298cd614
ORCID for Rinita Dam: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4620-7088

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Feb 2026 17:44
Last modified: 28 Feb 2026 03:20

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kieran E. Storer
Author: Jane P. Messina
Author: Eva Herreros-Moya
Author: Emery Metelo
Author: Josué Zanga
Author: Nono M. Mvuama
Author: Soleil Muzinga
Author: Rinita Dam ORCID iD
Author: Marianne Sinka
Author: Ivan Kiskin
Author: Josh Everett
Author: Yunpeng Li
Author: Stephen Roberts
Author: Katherine J. Willis

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×