The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Cross-cultural validation of the falls efficacy scale international (FES-I) in older people: results from Germany, the Netherlands and the UK were satisfactory

Cross-cultural validation of the falls efficacy scale international (FES-I) in older people: results from Germany, the Netherlands and the UK were satisfactory
Cross-cultural validation of the falls efficacy scale international (FES-I) in older people: results from Germany, the Netherlands and the UK were satisfactory

PURPOSE: To carry out a cross-cultural validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), a 16-item modified version of the Falls Efficacy Scale that was developed to assess both easy and more complex physical and social activities, in a range of languages and different cultural contexts.

METHOD: Data were collected in Germany (n = 94), The Netherlands (n = 193), and the UK (n = 178) in samples of older people living in the community. Four-week FES-I re-test data were collected in Germany and The Netherlands. Descriptive statistics and reliability estimates were computed as well as FES-I sum scores according to age, sex, falls history and fear of falling.

RESULTS: Mean inter-item correlations were all above 0.38 and internal reliability estimates were all 0.90 or above. The intra-class correlation coefficients in the German and the Dutch sample were 0.79 and 0.82, respectively. As expected, FES-I scores were associated with age, sex, falls history and fear of falling. In addition, the FES-I discriminated between sub-groups somewhat better than the original ten-item FES scale.

CONCLUSIONS: The FES-I has been shown to have acceptable reliability and construct validity in different samples in different countries and may be used in cross-cultural rehabilitation research and clinical trials.

Accidental Falls, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Fear, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results, Sex Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, United Kingdom
0963-8288
155-62
Kempen, Gertrudis I J M
ef20ea15-99b0-4f82-9a5f-b72c62c7cb6a
Todd, Chris J
8722a6fd-9ca0-419b-8855-5a7ac9e3e44a
Van Haastregt, Jolanda C M
d01b2ec4-7500-4eec-9d5d-06f9dd47dd29
Zijlstra, G A Rixt
03b8b43d-94fa-4321-9779-e632ab6b56d1
Beyer, Nina
77bc85db-9291-49d3-87f7-154d7bee5310
Freiberger, Ellen
7f2c03b4-76fa-4c40-a65e-ea9ea3ae8652
Hauer, Klaus A
edfc4f28-e3d3-4a11-9ae8-6285fcb57ca1
Piot-Ziegler, Chantal
6057aded-82f7-46ce-be22-b0d2e7568aaa
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Kempen, Gertrudis I J M
ef20ea15-99b0-4f82-9a5f-b72c62c7cb6a
Todd, Chris J
8722a6fd-9ca0-419b-8855-5a7ac9e3e44a
Van Haastregt, Jolanda C M
d01b2ec4-7500-4eec-9d5d-06f9dd47dd29
Zijlstra, G A Rixt
03b8b43d-94fa-4321-9779-e632ab6b56d1
Beyer, Nina
77bc85db-9291-49d3-87f7-154d7bee5310
Freiberger, Ellen
7f2c03b4-76fa-4c40-a65e-ea9ea3ae8652
Hauer, Klaus A
edfc4f28-e3d3-4a11-9ae8-6285fcb57ca1
Piot-Ziegler, Chantal
6057aded-82f7-46ce-be22-b0d2e7568aaa
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e

Kempen, Gertrudis I J M, Todd, Chris J, Van Haastregt, Jolanda C M, Zijlstra, G A Rixt, Beyer, Nina, Freiberger, Ellen, Hauer, Klaus A, Piot-Ziegler, Chantal and Yardley, Lucy (2007) Cross-cultural validation of the falls efficacy scale international (FES-I) in older people: results from Germany, the Netherlands and the UK were satisfactory. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29 (2), 155-62. (doi:10.1080/09638280600747637).

Record type: Article

Abstract

PURPOSE: To carry out a cross-cultural validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), a 16-item modified version of the Falls Efficacy Scale that was developed to assess both easy and more complex physical and social activities, in a range of languages and different cultural contexts.

METHOD: Data were collected in Germany (n = 94), The Netherlands (n = 193), and the UK (n = 178) in samples of older people living in the community. Four-week FES-I re-test data were collected in Germany and The Netherlands. Descriptive statistics and reliability estimates were computed as well as FES-I sum scores according to age, sex, falls history and fear of falling.

RESULTS: Mean inter-item correlations were all above 0.38 and internal reliability estimates were all 0.90 or above. The intra-class correlation coefficients in the German and the Dutch sample were 0.79 and 0.82, respectively. As expected, FES-I scores were associated with age, sex, falls history and fear of falling. In addition, the FES-I discriminated between sub-groups somewhat better than the original ten-item FES scale.

CONCLUSIONS: The FES-I has been shown to have acceptable reliability and construct validity in different samples in different countries and may be used in cross-cultural rehabilitation research and clinical trials.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 30 January 2007
Keywords: Accidental Falls, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Fear, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results, Sex Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, United Kingdom

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509654
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509654
ISSN: 0963-8288
PURE UUID: 20a6f168-ad97-4da5-8a1c-c451716f337e
ORCID for Lucy Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Feb 2026 17:52
Last modified: 28 Feb 2026 02:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gertrudis I J M Kempen
Author: Chris J Todd
Author: Jolanda C M Van Haastregt
Author: G A Rixt Zijlstra
Author: Nina Beyer
Author: Ellen Freiberger
Author: Klaus A Hauer
Author: Chantal Piot-Ziegler
Author: Lucy Yardley ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×